This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
On 02/15/2012 09:30 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>> But to be absolutely clear, glibc's libm doesn't have a problem
>> > meeting C99, AFAIK.
> That's not quite correct. It is completely broken in directed
> rounding modes (up to crashes).
Eh? C99 doesn't require directed rounding modes. I'll grant you,
if they are provided they shouldn't crash. :-)
Andrew.
- References:
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend