This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 22:45:07 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html
References: <CAH6eHdRKT1uxhertPTGuUDHSaE4YgWdvjynHKvtmmfhbSWj-7A@mail.gmail.com> <4F32D4F4.7080805@redhat.com> <CAH6eHdTHre6th8KRWokKPqWqGEOMA5RMBv+o48Zj-w5-PzNE5w@mail.gmail.com> <4F32EDF5.5030001@redhat.com>

On 8 February 2012 21:49, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> That's what I get for following the same pattern as those TM jokers.

Heh :)

> OK, hows this look? ?I added a link in the news as well.

Looks great to me.

References:
- New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html
  - From: Andrew MacLeod
- Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html
  - From: Andrew MacLeod

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]