This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6

From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: Peter Garbett <petegarbett1958 at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:28:13 +0100
Subject: Re: backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6
Authentication-results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ubizjak@gmail.com designates 10.236.46.232 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ubizjak@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=ubizjak@gmail.com
References: <CAFU7YBTmv9sgNu-Kfe9VmoCDW+s0cwiE5nFeR1Y6rDH6r4RUGQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc2BwQGeeK2DGknS7mnmRRPsgjOpxfZ+T+hiacnU7XpUzA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Richard Guenther
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Well, at least with my cross it does.
>>
>> this change, or something like it:
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=09a77c2ea0b41fdff8820cbcbe41b35762db5c45
>>
>> introduces a reference to TS_TYPED into the 4.6 branch for
>> fold-const.c, and it isnt defined,
>> or at least neither I nor my compiler can find it.
>>
>>
>> Any helpful hints on how to proceed?
>
> That backport looks bogus and should be reverted.

Oops. it looks I didn't test this with --enable-checking=fold.
However, reverting this will again trigger PR51118 - using TREE_TYPE
on wrong expression. Is there equivalent to TS_TYPED on 4.6- ?

Uros.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6
  - From: Peter Garbett
- Re: backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]