This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 02/09/2012 03:56 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, 9 Feb 2012, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/09/2012 03:28 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>>> So - do you have an idea what routines we can start off with to get
>>>> a full C99 set of routines for float, double and long double? ?The last
>>>> time I was exploring the idea again I was looking at the BSD libm.
>>>
>>> I'd start with INRIA's crlibm.
>>
>> Not complete. ?Too slow.
>
> Not complete, fair enough. ?But it's the fastest accurate one,
> isn't it?
Maybe. Nothing would prevent us from composing from multiple sources
of course. crlibm also only provides double precision routines.
Richard.
> Andrew.
- References:
- weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- From: Konstantin Vladimirov
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- From: James Courtier-Dutton
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend