This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html

From: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:35:15 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html
References: <CAH6eHdRKT1uxhertPTGuUDHSaE4YgWdvjynHKvtmmfhbSWj-7A@mail.gmail.com> <4F32D4F4.7080805@redhat.com> <CAH6eHdTHre6th8KRWokKPqWqGEOMA5RMBv+o48Zj-w5-PzNE5w@mail.gmail.com> <4F32EDF5.5030001@redhat.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1202090015290.6572@gerinyyl.fvgr>

On 02/08/2012 06:19 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

This news item on the main page is quite long if you compare it with the others and probably fills most of that column on page 1; could you cut this signficantly and instead link to the gcc-4.7/changes.html and have some of the good general background there?

Checked in the shortened version and <code> changes. How thats? seems better :-)

Andrew

References:
- New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html
  - From: Andrew MacLeod
- Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html
  - From: Andrew MacLeod
- Re: [PATCH] Re: New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]