This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012, Geert Bosch wrote:
> However, the glibc math library comes very close, and we can
> surely fix any remaining issues there may be. So, if we can
> use that as base, or as "fallback" library, we suddenly
> achieve some minimal accuracy guarantees across a wide
> range of platforms. If we can get this library with
> GPL+exception, we can even generate optimized variants
> and use a static library with LTO byte code allowing for
> inlining etc.
LGPL+exception - the soft-fp license - is what I've suggested before as
what would definitely be safe for any LGPL glibc code moving to be more
permissively licensed for use as a library distributed with GCC. (I think
the GPL+exception used for libgcc etc. would also be safe - but it's more
obviously safe for all uses to add an exception to the license currently
in use.)
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
- References:
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- From: James Courtier-Dutton
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend
- Re: weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend