This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
November 30, 2005
20:07 | Re: Optimzed vs. readable code | Gabriel Dos Reis |
20:00 | Re: Optimzed vs. readable code | Gabriel Dos Reis |
19:09 | Re: FW: Special functions in TR1 | Theodore Papadopoulo |
18:30 | Re: Optimzed vs. readable code | caj |
17:33 | Re: Optimzed vs. readable code | Pierre THIERRY |
17:31 | Re: Optimzed vs. readable code | Joe Buck |
17:28 | Re: FW: Special functions in TR1 | Paolo Carlini |
17:23 | FW: Special functions in TR1 | Smith-Rowland, Edward M (Contr |
17:18 | Re: Optimzed vs. readable code | Jonathan Wakely |
17:14 | Re: Optimzed vs. readable code | Pierre THIERRY |
16:55 | Re: Optimzed vs. readable code | caj |
November 29, 2005
November 28, 2005
23:16 | Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? | Peter Dimov |
22:49 | Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? | Gabriel Dos Reis |
22:28 | Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? | Howard Hinnant |
21:57 | Re: matching function for out_waiting in gcc 3.4.2 | Jonathan Wakely |
18:00 | Re: [patch] : Tiny change to _NullClass in <tr1/tuple> | Andrew Pinski |
17:55 | [patch] : Tiny change to _NullClass in <tr1/tuple> | chris jefferson |
00:32 | Re: It's v7-> mainline merge time! | Paolo Carlini |
November 27, 2005
17:22 | Re: It's v7-> mainline merge time! | Gabriel Dos Reis |
12:59 | Re: It's v7-> mainline merge time! | chris jefferson |
12:23 | Re: It's v7-> mainline merge time! | Paolo Carlini |
10:18 | Re: It's v7-> mainline merge time! | Paolo Carlini |
04:30 | Re: It's v7-> mainline merge time! | Gabriel Dos Reis |
November 26, 2005
21:24 | It's v7-> mainline merge time! | Paolo Carlini |
19:21 | Re: Deque... (Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425) | Paolo Carlini |
17:48 | Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? | Jonathan Wakely |
14:22 | Re: Deque... (Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425) | Howard Hinnant |
09:51 | Re: Deque... (Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425) | Paolo Carlini |
04:09 | Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? | Gabriel Dos Reis |
02:19 | Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? | Howard Hinnant |
November 25, 2005
23:36 | Re: Deque... (Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425) | Paolo Carlini |
23:29 | Re: Deque... (Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425) | Paolo Carlini |
22:26 | Re: Deque... (Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425) | Howard Hinnant |
19:00 | Deque... (Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425) | Paolo Carlini |
November 24, 2005
November 23, 2005
19:26 | Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? | Howard Hinnant |
12:11 | Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? | Paolo Carlini |
11:53 | Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? | chris jefferson |
November 22, 2005
01:08 | [v3] libstdc++/23591 | Benjamin Kosnik |
01:03 | Re: [Patch, RFA] libstdc++/24975: aliasing rules violations in set/multiset | Paolo Carlini |
00:40 | Re: [Patch, RFA] libstdc++/24975: aliasing rules violations in set/multiset | Gabriel Dos Reis |
00:15 | [Patch, RFA] libstdc++/24975: aliasing rules violations in set/multiset | Paolo Carlini |
00:13 | [v3] makefile tweaks for CXXFLAGS, etc | Benjamin Kosnik |
November 18, 2005
14:36 | Re: Current __exchange_and_add on ia64 | Paolo Carlini |
09:39 | Re: Current __exchange_and_add on ia64 (was: Memory barriers..) | Alexander Terekhov |
01:17 | Current __exchange_and_add on ia64 (was: Memory barriers..) | Paolo Carlini |
November 17, 2005
23:32 | Re: eprintf for darwin, as committed | Benjamin Kosnik |
20:09 | eprintf for darwin, as committed | Geoffrey Keating |
November 16, 2005
16:23 | Re: eprintf, darwin, etc. | Benjamin Kosnik |
15:48 | Re: lazy facet instantiation | Paolo Carlini |
15:37 | Re: lazy facet instantiation | Howard Hinnant |
11:27 | Re: lazy facet instantiation | Paolo Carlini |
02:58 | Re: lazy facet instantiation | Howard Hinnant |
01:32 | Re: lazy facet instantiation | Martin Sebor |
00:45 | Re: new link errors with latest stdc++ | Kurt Kohler |
00:10 | Re: new link errors with latest stdc++ | Paolo Carlini |
00:00 | Re: new link errors with latest stdc++ | Paolo Carlini |
November 15, 2005
23:50 | new link errors with latest stdc++ | Kurt Kohler |
21:53 | Re: lazy facet instantiation | Howard Hinnant |
21:03 | Re: lazy facet instantiation | Paolo Carlini |
20:49 | Re: lazy facet instantiation | Martin Sebor |
20:44 | Re: lazy facet instantiation | Howard Hinnant |
20:40 | Re: lazy facet instantiation | Paolo Carlini |
20:19 | Re: lazy facet instantiation | Howard Hinnant |
20:16 | Re: lazy facet instantiation | Howard Hinnant |
19:53 | Re: lazy facet instantiation | Paolo Carlini |
19:45 | Re: lazy facet instantiation | Paolo Carlini |
19:02 | lazy facet instantiation | Howard Hinnant |
06:06 | eprintf, darwin, etc. | Geoffrey Keating |
04:52 | libstdc++ configury fix for darwin exports | Geoffrey Keating |
November 14, 2005
19:35 | Re: [Patch, v7] DR 431 for sso/rc-strings | Paolo Carlini |
19:16 | Re: [Patch, v7] DR 431 for sso/rc-strings | Benjamin Kosnik |
12:10 | Re: [Patch, v7] DR 431 for sso/rc-strings | Paolo Carlini |
11:17 | [Patch, v7] DR 431 for sso/rc-strings | Paolo Carlini |
November 11, 2005
22:02 | Re: LSB 3.0 compliance of libstdc++.so.6 independent of allocator? | Mats Wichmann |
18:54 | Re: LSB 3.0 compliance of libstdc++.so.6 independent of allocator? | Benjamin Kosnik |
15:10 | Re: sso tradeoffs | Howard Hinnant |
14:35 | Re: sso tradeoffs | Paolo Carlini |
14:23 | Re: sso tradeoffs | Peter Dimov |
14:19 | Re: sso tradeoffs | Howard Hinnant |
11:21 | [RFH] libstdc++ compatibility configured with different allocators | Matthias Klose |
11:07 | LSB 3.0 compliance of libstdc++.so.6 independent of allocator? | Matthias Klose |
01:44 | Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock | Paolo Carlini |
01:17 | Re: sso tradeoffs | Paolo Carlini |
November 10, 2005
23:01 | Re: sso tradeoffs | Gabriel Dos Reis |
22:37 | Re: sso tradeoffs | Howard Hinnant |
22:25 | Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock | Peter Dimov |
14:15 | Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vs numeric_limits<integer>::traps | Andrew Pinski |
08:20 | Re: Q. about GDR's addition of complex-accessor overloads. | Gabriel Dos Reis |
07:35 | Q. about GDR's addition of complex-accessor overloads. | Jan van Dijk |
03:03 | Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vs numeric_limits<integer>::traps | Gabriel Dos Reis |
01:24 | Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vsnumeric_limits<integer>::traps | Benjamin Kosnik |
01:21 | Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vs numeric_limits<integer>::traps | Paolo Carlini |
00:59 | Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vs numeric_limits<integer>::traps | Gabriel Dos Reis |
00:50 | Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vs numeric_limits<integer>::traps | Gabriel Dos Reis |
00:40 | Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vsnumeric_limits<integer>::traps | Benjamin Kosnik |
November 09, 2005
23:30 | Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vsnumeric_limits<integer>::traps | Benjamin Kosnik |
19:32 | Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock | Paolo Carlini |
16:13 | Re: Getting file descriptors from ifstream | Paolo Carlini |
16:06 | Re: Getting file descriptors from ifstream | Theodore Papadopoulo |
13:55 | Re: Getting file descriptors from ifstream | Paolo Carlini |
13:51 | Getting file descriptors from ifstream | massimiliano cialdi |
13:48 | Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock | Paolo Carlini |
12:16 | Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock | Paolo Carlini |
11:54 | Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock | Alexander Terekhov |
November 08, 2005
November 07, 2005
November 06, 2005
November 04, 2005
19:54 | Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vs numeric_limits<integer>::traps | Paolo Carlini |
17:38 | Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 | Benjamin Kosnik |
17:03 | Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 | Howard Hinnant |
15:47 | Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 | Paolo Carlini |
15:34 | Re: GCC Bugzilla Bug 24025 | Paolo Carlini |
15:26 | Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 | Paolo Carlini |
15:22 | Re: GCC Bugzilla Bug 24025 | Howard Hinnant |
15:20 | Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 | Howard Hinnant |
11:01 | Re: GCC Bugzilla Bug 24025 | Paolo Carlini |
10:35 | Re: GCC Bugzilla Bug 24025 | Paolo Carlini |
10:26 | Re: GCC Bugzilla Bug 24025 | Paolo Carlini |
10:05 | Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 | Paolo Carlini |
09:38 | Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 | Paolo Carlini |
01:27 | GCC Bugzilla Bug 24025 | Howard Hinnant |
November 03, 2005
18:40 | [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vs numeric_limits<integer>::traps | Paolo Carlini |
14:47 | Re: sso tradeoffs | Howard Hinnant |
13:11 | [v3] Further tweak sso_string::_M_swap | Paolo Carlini |
11:15 | Re: empty slices: defined? | Paolo Carlini |
11:14 | Re: empty slices: defined? | Gabriel Dos Reis |
11:03 | Re: sso tradeoffs | Paolo Carlini |
09:50 | Re: sso tradeoffs | Paolo Carlini |
November 02, 2005
22:18 | empty slices: defined? | DJ Delorie |
18:55 | Re: sso tradeoffs | Howard Hinnant |
18:48 | Re: sso tradeoffs | Paolo Carlini |
18:35 | Re: sso tradeoffs | Paolo Carlini |
18:17 | sso tradeoffs | Howard Hinnant |
15:34 | Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 | Paolo Carlini |
15:18 | Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 | Paolo Carlini |
15:00 | Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 | chris jefferson |
14:57 | Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 | Paolo Carlini |
14:24 | [Patch, v7] libstdc++/24617 (was: Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425) | Paolo Carlini |
13:44 | Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 | Paolo Carlini |
13:22 | Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 | chris jefferson |
November 01, 2005
20:17 | Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 | Paolo Carlini |
18:03 | Re: Silently passing wrong input for good one | Paolo Carlini |
16:39 | Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 | Howard Hinnant |
16:31 | Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 | Paolo Carlini |
16:13 | Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 | Howard Hinnant |
13:53 | [Patch] libstdc++/23425 | Paolo Carlini |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]