This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: empty slices: defined?

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:55:40 -0500
Subject: Re: empty slices: defined?
References: <200511022218.jA2MIcKL024580@greed.delorie.com><m3hdao70pd.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><200511071950.jA7JonrZ017922@greed.delorie.com><m3r79s4095.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><200511072146.jA7Lk05b020854@greed.delorie.com><m3fyq83y6a.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><200511072225.jA7MPQJM021606@greed.delorie.com> <m3k6fkge2i.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>

> | 	(_Closure(_Array<_Tp>(_M_data), __gs._M_index->_M_index));	<<<<<<<
> 
> If __gs._M_index is null, what would be computing here?

Essentially, we're passing &(__gs._M_index->_M_index).  GCC computes
this address, but doesn't dereference it.  It's a reference parameter.

References:
- empty slices: defined?
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: empty slices: defined?
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: empty slices: defined?
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: empty slices: defined?
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: empty slices: defined?
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: empty slices: defined?
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: empty slices: defined?
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: empty slices: defined?
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]