libstdc++ archive
author index for November, 2005

This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Alexander Terekhov

2005-11-09 11:54 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock
2005-11-18 09:39 Re: Current __exchange_and_add on ia64 (was: Memory barriers..)

anandi.thirunavukkarasu

2005-11-29 09:57 matching function for ipfx in gcc 3.4.2

Andrew Pinski

2005-11-07 15:48 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 16:03 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-10 14:15 Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vs numeric_limits<integer>::traps
2005-11-28 18:00 Re: [patch] : Tiny change to _NullClass in <tr1/tuple>

Benjamin Kosnik

2005-11-04 17:38 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425
2005-11-07 17:11 Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vsnumeric_limits<integer>::traps
2005-11-07 22:40 Re: segv when thread exits after throw/catch of C++ exception
2005-11-09 23:30 Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vsnumeric_limits<integer>::traps
2005-11-10 00:40 Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vsnumeric_limits<integer>::traps
2005-11-10 01:24 Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vsnumeric_limits<integer>::traps
2005-11-11 18:54 Re: LSB 3.0 compliance of libstdc++.so.6 independent of allocator?
2005-11-14 19:16 Re: [Patch, v7] DR 431 for sso/rc-strings
2005-11-16 16:23 Re: eprintf, darwin, etc.
2005-11-17 23:32 Re: eprintf for darwin, as committed
2005-11-22 00:13 [v3] makefile tweaks for CXXFLAGS, etc
2005-11-22 01:08 [v3] libstdc++/23591
2005-11-29 17:21 RFC libstdc++-v3 -> libstdc++ rename
2005-11-29 17:33 Re: matching function for ipfx in gcc 3.4.2
2005-11-29 17:44 Re: It's v7-> mainline merge time!
2005-11-29 17:48 Re: RFC libstdc++-v3 -> libstdc++ rename
2005-11-29 18:03 Re: vector::operator[]

bert hubert

2005-11-06 00:40 exchange_and_add inlined in g++ 4.0.2
2005-11-06 01:15 Re: exchange_and_add inlined in g++ 4.0.2
2005-11-07 10:56 Re: exchange_and_add inlined in g++ 4.0.2
2005-11-07 12:45 Re: exchange_and_add inlined in g++ 4.0.2

Bo Persson

2005-11-24 17:12 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?

caj

2005-11-30 16:55 Re: Optimzed vs. readable code
2005-11-30 18:30 Re: Optimzed vs. readable code

chris jefferson

2005-11-02 13:22 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425
2005-11-02 15:00 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425
2005-11-23 11:53 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-24 12:09 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-27 12:59 Re: It's v7-> mainline merge time!
2005-11-28 17:55 [patch] : Tiny change to _NullClass in <tr1/tuple>
2005-11-29 17:14 Re: vector::operator[]

Daniel Jacobowitz

2005-11-07 15:27 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 15:45 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3

DJ Delorie

2005-11-02 22:18 empty slices: defined?
2005-11-07 19:51 Re: empty slices: defined?
2005-11-07 21:46 Re: empty slices: defined?
2005-11-07 22:25 Re: empty slices: defined?
2005-11-08 00:55 Re: empty slices: defined?
2005-11-08 01:33 Re: empty slices: defined?
2005-11-08 02:39 Re: empty slices: defined?
2005-11-08 20:53 const valarray question
2005-11-08 21:34 Re: const valarray question

Ed Connell

2005-11-07 18:57 segv when thread exits after throw/catch of C++ exception

Florian Weimer

2005-11-06 20:32 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-06 20:34 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-06 21:07 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3

Gabriel Dos Reis

2005-11-03 11:14 Re: empty slices: defined?
2005-11-07 14:39 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 17:23 Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vs numeric_limits<integer>::traps
2005-11-07 18:50 Re: empty slices: defined?
2005-11-07 21:28 Re: empty slices: defined?
2005-11-07 22:13 Re: empty slices: defined?
2005-11-07 23:37 Re: empty slices: defined?
2005-11-08 00:49 Re: empty slices: defined?
2005-11-08 02:25 Re: empty slices: defined?
2005-11-08 21:26 Re: const valarray question
2005-11-10 00:50 Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vs numeric_limits<integer>::traps
2005-11-10 00:59 Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vs numeric_limits<integer>::traps
2005-11-10 03:03 Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vs numeric_limits<integer>::traps
2005-11-10 08:20 Re: Q. about GDR's addition of complex-accessor overloads.
2005-11-10 23:01 Re: sso tradeoffs
2005-11-22 00:40 Re: [Patch, RFA] libstdc++/24975: aliasing rules violations in set/multiset
2005-11-24 09:34 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-24 12:28 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-24 18:32 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-24 19:52 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-24 19:57 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-24 19:57 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-26 04:09 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-27 04:30 Re: It's v7-> mainline merge time!
2005-11-27 17:22 Re: It's v7-> mainline merge time!
2005-11-28 22:49 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 00:00 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 02:30 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 04:05 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 14:49 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 15:08 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 17:40 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 17:42 Re: RFC libstdc++-v3 -> libstdc++ rename
2005-11-29 17:43 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 19:13 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 19:17 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 19:21 Re: Optimzed vs. readable code
2005-11-29 19:47 Re: vector::operator[]
2005-11-29 20:15 Re: vector::operator[]
2005-11-30 20:00 Re: Optimzed vs. readable code
2005-11-30 20:07 Re: Optimzed vs. readable code

Geoffrey Keating

2005-11-15 04:52 libstdc++ configury fix for darwin exports
2005-11-15 06:06 eprintf, darwin, etc.
2005-11-17 20:09 eprintf for darwin, as committed
2005-11-24 22:54 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?

Howard Hinnant

2005-11-01 16:13 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425
2005-11-01 16:39 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425
2005-11-02 18:17 sso tradeoffs
2005-11-02 18:55 Re: sso tradeoffs
2005-11-03 14:47 Re: sso tradeoffs
2005-11-04 01:27 GCC Bugzilla Bug 24025
2005-11-04 15:20 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425
2005-11-04 15:22 Re: GCC Bugzilla Bug 24025
2005-11-04 17:03 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425
2005-11-06 17:59 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-08 20:08 Re: ext/vstring.h swap vs unequal allocators
2005-11-10 22:37 Re: sso tradeoffs
2005-11-11 14:19 Re: sso tradeoffs
2005-11-11 15:10 Re: sso tradeoffs
2005-11-15 19:02 lazy facet instantiation
2005-11-15 20:16 Re: lazy facet instantiation
2005-11-15 20:19 Re: lazy facet instantiation
2005-11-15 20:44 Re: lazy facet instantiation
2005-11-15 21:53 Re: lazy facet instantiation
2005-11-16 02:58 Re: lazy facet instantiation
2005-11-16 15:37 Re: lazy facet instantiation
2005-11-23 19:26 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-24 04:00 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-24 16:52 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425
2005-11-24 17:41 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-24 18:26 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-24 18:39 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-24 18:56 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-25 22:26 Re: Deque... (Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425)
2005-11-26 02:19 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-26 14:22 Re: Deque... (Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425)
2005-11-28 22:28 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 03:11 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 03:44 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 03:57 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 17:07 vector::operator[]
2005-11-29 18:00 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 18:45 Re: Optimzed vs. readable code

Ian Lance Taylor

2005-11-06 20:10 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3

Jan van Dijk

2005-11-10 07:35 Q. about GDR's addition of complex-accessor overloads.

Joe Buck

2005-11-29 17:45 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 17:47 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-30 17:31 Re: Optimzed vs. readable code

Jonathan Wakely

2005-11-26 17:48 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-28 21:57 Re: matching function for out_waiting in gcc 3.4.2
2005-11-29 00:25 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 14:23 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 14:26 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 16:55 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 17:44 Re: RFC libstdc++-v3 -> libstdc++ rename
2005-11-29 17:49 Re: vector::operator[]
2005-11-29 17:51 Re: RFC libstdc++-v3 -> libstdc++ rename
2005-11-29 18:03 Re: vector::operator[]
2005-11-29 20:03 Re: vector::operator[]
2005-11-30 17:18 Re: Optimzed vs. readable code

Kurt Kohler

2005-11-08 18:51 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock
2005-11-08 22:27 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock
2005-11-08 23:15 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock
2005-11-15 23:50 new link errors with latest stdc++
2005-11-16 00:45 Re: new link errors with latest stdc++

Mark Mitchell

2005-11-06 18:39 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-06 19:02 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-06 19:26 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-06 19:40 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-06 21:17 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3

Martin Sebor

2005-11-15 20:49 Re: lazy facet instantiation
2005-11-16 01:32 Re: lazy facet instantiation

massimiliano cialdi

2005-11-09 13:51 Getting file descriptors from ifstream

Mats Wichmann

2005-11-11 22:02 Re: LSB 3.0 compliance of libstdc++.so.6 independent of allocator?

Matthias Klose

2005-11-11 11:07 LSB 3.0 compliance of libstdc++.so.6 independent of allocator?
2005-11-11 11:21 [RFH] libstdc++ compatibility configured with different allocators

Paolo Carlini

2005-11-01 13:53 [Patch] libstdc++/23425
2005-11-01 16:31 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425
2005-11-01 18:03 Re: Silently passing wrong input for good one
2005-11-01 20:17 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425
2005-11-02 13:44 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425
2005-11-02 14:24 [Patch, v7] libstdc++/24617 (was: Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425)
2005-11-02 14:57 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425
2005-11-02 15:18 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425
2005-11-02 15:34 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425
2005-11-02 18:35 Re: sso tradeoffs
2005-11-02 18:48 Re: sso tradeoffs
2005-11-03 09:50 Re: sso tradeoffs
2005-11-03 11:03 Re: sso tradeoffs
2005-11-03 11:15 Re: empty slices: defined?
2005-11-03 13:11 [v3] Further tweak sso_string::_M_swap
2005-11-03 18:40 [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vs numeric_limits<integer>::traps
2005-11-04 09:38 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425
2005-11-04 10:05 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425
2005-11-04 10:26 Re: GCC Bugzilla Bug 24025
2005-11-04 10:35 Re: GCC Bugzilla Bug 24025
2005-11-04 11:01 Re: GCC Bugzilla Bug 24025
2005-11-04 15:26 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425
2005-11-04 15:34 Re: GCC Bugzilla Bug 24025
2005-11-04 15:47 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425
2005-11-04 19:54 Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vs numeric_limits<integer>::traps
2005-11-06 01:09 Re: exchange_and_add inlined in g++ 4.0.2
2005-11-06 01:31 Re: exchange_and_add inlined in g++ 4.0.2
2005-11-06 10:34 Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-06 11:03 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-06 11:43 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-06 14:12 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-06 18:42 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-06 18:56 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-06 19:19 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-06 19:46 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-06 19:54 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-06 20:14 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-06 21:12 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 00:35 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 01:24 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 01:33 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 02:45 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 10:03 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 10:08 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 10:10 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 10:14 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 10:29 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 10:41 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 10:45 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 11:04 Re: exchange_and_add inlined in g++ 4.0.2
2005-11-07 11:19 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 11:25 Re: exchange_and_add inlined in g++ 4.0.2
2005-11-07 12:53 Re: exchange_and_add inlined in g++ 4.0.2
2005-11-07 12:54 Re: exchange_and_add inlined in g++ 4.0.2
2005-11-07 13:25 Re: exchange_and_add inlined in g++ 4.0.2
2005-11-07 15:58 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 16:33 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-08 11:16 __gcc_cpu_feature
2005-11-08 12:25 Re: __gcc_cpu_feature
2005-11-08 13:57 Memory barriers vs lock/unlock
2005-11-08 18:01 ext/vstring.h swap vs unequal allocators
2005-11-08 18:07 Re: ext/vstring.h swap vs unequal allocators
2005-11-08 18:14 Re: ext/vstring.h swap vs unequal allocators
2005-11-08 20:40 Re: ext/vstring.h swap vs unequal allocators
2005-11-08 21:06 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock
2005-11-08 21:25 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock
2005-11-08 22:32 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock
2005-11-09 12:16 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock
2005-11-09 13:48 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock
2005-11-09 13:55 Re: Getting file descriptors from ifstream
2005-11-09 16:13 Re: Getting file descriptors from ifstream
2005-11-09 19:32 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock
2005-11-10 01:21 Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vs numeric_limits<integer>::traps
2005-11-11 01:17 Re: sso tradeoffs
2005-11-11 01:44 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock
2005-11-11 14:35 Re: sso tradeoffs
2005-11-14 11:17 [Patch, v7] DR 431 for sso/rc-strings
2005-11-14 12:10 Re: [Patch, v7] DR 431 for sso/rc-strings
2005-11-14 19:35 Re: [Patch, v7] DR 431 for sso/rc-strings
2005-11-15 19:45 Re: lazy facet instantiation
2005-11-15 19:53 Re: lazy facet instantiation
2005-11-15 20:40 Re: lazy facet instantiation
2005-11-15 21:03 Re: lazy facet instantiation
2005-11-16 00:00 Re: new link errors with latest stdc++
2005-11-16 00:10 Re: new link errors with latest stdc++
2005-11-16 11:27 Re: lazy facet instantiation
2005-11-16 15:48 Re: lazy facet instantiation
2005-11-18 01:17 Current __exchange_and_add on ia64 (was: Memory barriers..)
2005-11-18 14:36 Re: Current __exchange_and_add on ia64
2005-11-22 00:15 [Patch, RFA] libstdc++/24975: aliasing rules violations in set/multiset
2005-11-22 01:03 Re: [Patch, RFA] libstdc++/24975: aliasing rules violations in set/multiset
2005-11-23 12:11 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-24 00:49 Re: new link errors with latest stdc++
2005-11-24 01:44 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-24 10:46 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-24 13:05 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425
2005-11-24 13:19 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425
2005-11-24 18:33 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-24 23:15 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-25 19:00 Deque... (Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425)
2005-11-25 23:29 Re: Deque... (Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425)
2005-11-25 23:36 Re: Deque... (Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425)
2005-11-26 09:51 Re: Deque... (Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425)
2005-11-26 19:21 Re: Deque... (Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425)
2005-11-26 21:24 It's v7-> mainline merge time!
2005-11-27 10:18 Re: It's v7-> mainline merge time!
2005-11-27 12:23 Re: It's v7-> mainline merge time!
2005-11-28 00:32 Re: It's v7-> mainline merge time!
2005-11-29 13:26 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 14:10 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 17:46 Re: vector::operator[]
2005-11-29 17:50 Re: It's v7-> mainline merge time!
2005-11-29 17:50 Re: vector::operator[]
2005-11-30 17:28 Re: FW: Special functions in TR1

Peter Dimov

2005-11-06 20:32 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 13:17 Re: exchange_and_add inlined in g++ 4.0.2
2005-11-08 19:21 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock
2005-11-10 22:25 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock
2005-11-11 14:23 Re: sso tradeoffs
2005-11-24 18:44 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-28 23:16 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 00:53 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 11:59 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 12:11 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 14:06 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 14:12 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 16:42 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 18:49 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 18:49 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
2005-11-29 18:59 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?

Pierre THIERRY

2005-11-29 18:05 Optimzed vs. readable code
2005-11-29 22:31 Re: Optimzed vs. readable code
2005-11-30 17:14 Re: Optimzed vs. readable code
2005-11-30 17:33 Re: Optimzed vs. readable code

Richard Guenther

2005-11-06 10:52 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-06 13:50 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-06 19:16 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 08:03 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 10:24 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 10:40 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 11:15 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-08 12:16 Re: __gcc_cpu_feature

Richard Henderson

2005-11-06 18:52 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-06 19:32 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-06 20:47 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-06 23:37 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 01:11 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 08:46 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 08:47 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 08:50 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3

Smith-Rowland, Edward M (Contractor)

2005-11-30 17:23 FW: Special functions in TR1

Theodore Papadopoulo

2005-11-09 16:06 Re: Getting file descriptors from ifstream
2005-11-29 17:31 Re: vector::operator[]
2005-11-29 19:34 Re: vector::operator[]
2005-11-30 19:09 Re: FW: Special functions in TR1

Ulrich Drepper

2005-11-06 21:13 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 15:20 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 15:42 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 15:59 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
2005-11-07 16:25 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3

libstdc++ archiveauthor index for November, 2005

libstdc++ archive
author index for November, 2005