October 2010 Archives by date

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Fri Oct 1 09:11:00 GMT 2010
Ending: Sun Oct 31 19:53:00 GMT 2010
Messages: 514

• building gcc-4.3.5 for sh-elf --with-newlib --enable-language="c,c++"   Fabio Giovagnini
• GCC 4.4.5 Status Report (2010-10-01)   Jakub Jelinek
• Range-based for in c++98   Jason Merrill
• gcc-testresults submissions   Sean McGovern
• gcc-testresults submissions   Richard Henderson
• gcc-testresults submissions   Andreas Schwab
• gcc-testresults submissions   Sean McGovern
• toplevel *again* out of sync   Paolo Bonzini
• toplevel *again* out of sync   Ralf Wildenhues
• make recheck?   Ralf Wildenhues
• toplevel *again* out of sync   Ralf Wildenhues
• toplevel *again* out of sync   Paolo Bonzini
• make recheck?   NightStrike
• make recheck?   Ralf Wildenhues
• make recheck?   Diego Novillo
• Range-based for in c++98   Rodrigo Rivas
• [rfc] stack alignment macro cleanup   Richard Henderson
• gcc-4.6-20101002 is now available   gccadmin@gcc.gnu.org
• [rfc] stack alignment macro cleanup   H.J. Lu
• toplevel *again* out of sync   DJ Delorie
• Problem in bootstrapping on mingw   FX
• Problem in bootstrapping on mingw   Kai Tietz
• Problem in bootstrapping on mingw   FX
• Problem in bootstrapping on mingw   FX
• Who owns config.rpath?   Dave Korn
• Who owns config.rpath?   Ralf Wildenhues
• Who owns config.rpath?   Dave Korn
• GCC 4.4.5 Released   Jakub Jelinek
• RFE: 'enable checking' as a GCC compilation switch?   Gary Funck
• RFE: 'enable checking' as a GCC compilation switch?   Ian Lance Taylor
• gcc-4.3-20101003 is now available   gccadmin@gcc.gnu.org
• Problem in bootstrapping on mingw   NightStrike
• toplevel *again* out of sync   Naveen H. S
• about function attributes for functions returning a pointer   Uwe Kleine-König
• [RFC] Dealing with TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS   FX
• How to get attribute of callee   Georg Lay
• [RFC] Dealing with TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS   Joseph S. Myers
• Range-based for in c++98   Jason Merrill
• Map tree to properties   Hongtao
• Map tree to properties   Richard Guenther
• Range-based for in c++98   Rodrigo Rivas
• Map tree to properties   Basile Starynkevitch
• [C++-0x] User-defined literals.   Jason Merrill
• Range-based for in c++98   Jason Merrill
• Range-based for in c++98   Nicola Pero
• [rfc] stack alignment macro cleanup   Paul Brook
• [rfc] stack alignment macro cleanup   Richard Henderson
• [C++-0x] User-defined literals.   3dw4rd@verizon.net
• about function attributes for functions returning a pointer   Ian Lance Taylor
• [rfc] stack alignment macro cleanup   Richard Henderson
• Range-based for in c++98   Rodrigo Rivas
• [C++-0x] User-defined literals.   Jason Merrill
• [RFC] Dealing with TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS   FX
• [rfc] stack alignment macro cleanup   Paul Brook
• [rfc] stack alignment macro cleanup   H.J. Lu
• GCC Bugzilla upgrade to version 3.6.2 ready   Florian Weimer
• Problem in bootstrapping on mingw   Ralf Wildenhues
• GCC Bugzilla upgrade to version 3.6.2 ready   Frédéric Buclin
• Unable to build --enable-build-with-cxx --enable-languages=c,c++ --with-gold   Jerry Quinn
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Joakim Tjernlund
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Ian Lance Taylor
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Joakim Tjernlund
• Unable to build --enable-build-with-cxx --enable-languages=c,c++ --with-gold   Ian Lance Taylor
• Unable to build --enable-build-with-cxx --enable-languages=c,c++ --with-gold   Andreas Schwab
• [rfc] stack alignment macro cleanup   Richard Henderson
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Richard Henderson
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Joakim Tjernlund
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Richard Henderson
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Joakim Tjernlund
• [RFC] Dealing with TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS   FX
• [RFC] Dealing with TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS   Eric Botcazou
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Richard Henderson
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Alan Modra
• gcc-4.4-20101005 is now available   gccadmin@gcc.gnu.org
• [rfc] stack alignment macro cleanup   H.J. Lu
• [rfc] stack alignment macro cleanup   H.J. Lu
• *_ALIGN_MAX_SKIP macros   DJ Delorie
• contacte-me   Ho Chen Tung
• LLVM 2.8 Release   Chris Lattner
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Joakim Tjernlund
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Gabriel Paubert
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Joakim Tjernlund
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Ian Lance Taylor
• constant string changed   Phung Nguyen
• constant string changed   Jakub Jelinek
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Matt Thomas
• constant string changed   Phung Nguyen
• constant string changed   Richard Guenther
• constant string changed   Robert Dewar
• constant string changed   Matt Thomas
• constant string changed   Robert Dewar
• Regarding the GCC Binaries and Build status pages   Gerald Pfeifer
• Bootstrap broken on Cygwin, fix on the way.   Dave Korn
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Michael Meissner
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Joakim Tjernlund
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Richard Guenther
• Bootstrap broken on Cygwin, fix on the way.   Dave Korn
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Joakim Tjernlund
• [wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: new mirror   James Miller
• rules for svn commit-ing a [gengtype] patch?   Basile Starynkevitch
• rules for svn commit-ing a [gengtype] patch?   Ian Lance Taylor
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Michael Meissner
• rules for svn commit-ing a [gengtype] patch?   Basile Starynkevitch
• rules for svn commit-ing a [gengtype] patch?   Diego Novillo
• toplevel *again* out of sync   Ralf Wildenhues
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Joakim Tjernlund
• gcc-4.5-20101007 is now available   gccadmin@gcc.gnu.org
• GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?   Gary Funck
• GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?   Ian Lance Taylor
• GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?   Gary Funck
• RFE: 'enable checking' as a GCC compilation switch?   Gary Funck
• End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010   NightStrike
• End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010   Jonathan Wakely
• End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010   Kai Tietz
• GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?   Basile Starynkevitch
• GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?   Gary Funck
• End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010   NightStrike
• GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?   Ian Lance Taylor
• GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?   Basile Starynkevitch
• GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?   Ian Lance Taylor
• End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010   Jonathan Wakely
• End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010   NightStrike
• GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?   Basile Starynkevitch
• GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?   Gary Funck
• GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?   Ian Lance Taylor
• GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?   Gary Funck
• GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?   Hargett, Matt
• End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010   Richard Guenther
• End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010   NightStrike
• GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?   Ian Lance Taylor
• GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?   Manuel López-Ibáñez
• End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010   Richard Guenther
• GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?   Dave Korn
• End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010   Dave Korn
• GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?   Geert Bosch
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Joakim Tjernlund
• GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?   Manuel López-Ibáñez
• GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?   Jakub Jelinek
• GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?   Manuel López-Ibáñez
• GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?   Florian Weimer
• gcc-4.6-20101009 is now available   gccadmin@gcc.gnu.org
• MIPS64 GCC not building at r165246   David Daney
• MIPS64 GCC not building at r165246   Richard Sandiford
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Joakim Tjernlund
• ICE with GCC-4.5.1-20100708   NightStrike
• ICE with GCC-4.5.1-20100708   Angelo Graziosi
• forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd)   Basile Starynkevitch
• forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd)   Marc Glisse
• gcc-4.3-20101010 is now available   gccadmin@gcc.gnu.org
• forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd)   Basile Starynkevitch
• forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd)   Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
• forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd)   Matthias Klose
• forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd)   Eric Botcazou
• forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd)   Basile Starynkevitch
• gcov for assembly   ravi s
• unsupported symbol binding (probably GOLD related) when building trunk?   Basile Starynkevitch
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Alan Modra
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Joakim Tjernlund
• GCC and out-of-range constant array indexes?   Gary Funck
• DECL_SOURCE_LINE of else   Peter Jensen
• Bootstrap failures on sparc/x86 solaris2.10 machines   Art Haas
• GNAT ARM EABI ZCX, possible stopper needs clarification   Luke A. Guest
• unsupported symbol binding (probably GOLD related) when building trunk?   Ian Lance Taylor
• DECL_SOURCE_LINE of else   Ian Lance Taylor
• Bootstrap failures on sparc/x86 solaris2.10 machines   Rainer Orth
• rgthydhgrfgh   gingerab68
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Joakim Tjernlund
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Joakim Tjernlund
• Insert new global declaration to Gimple   Hongtao
• Insert new global declaration to Gimple   Hongtao
• Gcc Summit - room share   James Lemke
• gcov for assembly   Holger Blasum
• Dragonegg-2.8 released   Duncan Sands
• Bootstrap errors on i386-pc-solaris2.10 bisected   Art Haas
• Bootstrap errors on i386-pc-solaris2.10 bisected   H.J. Lu
• *_ALIGN_MAX_SKIP macros   Ian Lance Taylor
• gcc-4.4-20101012 is now available   gccadmin@gcc.gnu.org
• GCSE problem on a gcc testsuite   johnc
• GCSE problem on a gcc testsuite   Eric Botcazou
• show size of stack needed by functions   Sebastian
• show size of stack needed by functions   Ian Lance Taylor
• show size of stack needed by functions   H.J. Lu
• Trouble doing bootstrap   Paul Koning
• show size of stack needed by functions   Sebastian
• show size of stack needed by functions   Joe Buck
• show size of stack needed by functions   Richard Guenther
• show size of stack needed by functions   Sebastian
• Trouble doing bootstrap   Dave Korn
• show size of stack needed by functions   Richard Guenther
• show size of stack needed by functions   Eric Botcazou
• "Ada.Exceptions.Exception_Propagation" is not a predefined library unit   Luke A. Guest
• show size of stack needed by functions   Ian Lance Taylor
• Trouble doing bootstrap   Paul Koning
• Trouble doing bootstrap   Paul Koning
• Trouble doing bootstrap   Ian Lance Taylor
• Trouble doing bootstrap   Paul Koning
• Trouble doing bootstrap   Ian Lance Taylor
• Trouble doing bootstrap   Ralf Wildenhues
• show size of stack needed by functions   Anthony Foiani
• "Ada.Exceptions.Exception_Propagation" is not a predefined library unit   Duncan Sands
• Trouble doing bootstrap   Jonathan Wakely
• "Ada.Exceptions.Exception_Propagation" is not a predefined library unit   Luke A. Guest
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Joakim Tjernlund
• Options for dumping dependence checking results   Hongtao
• LTO symtab sections vs. missing symbols (libcalls maybe?) and lto-plugin vs. COFF   Dave Korn
• LTO symtab sections vs. missing symbols (libcalls maybe?) and lto-plugin vs. COFF   Richard Guenther
• "Ada.Exceptions.Exception_Propagation" is not a predefined library unit   Olivier Hainque
• LTO symtab sections vs. missing symbols (libcalls maybe?) and lto-plugin vs. COFF   Dave Korn
• LTO symtab sections vs. missing symbols (libcalls maybe?) and lto-plugin vs. COFF   Richard Guenther
• Bootstrap failures on sparc/x86 solaris2.10 machines   Arthur Haas
• Bootstrap errors on i386-pc-solaris2.10 bisected   Arthur Haas
• LTO symtab sections vs. missing symbols (libcalls maybe?) and lto-plugin vs. COFF   Dave Korn
• Trouble doing bootstrap   Paul Koning
• Trouble doing bootstrap   Ian Lance Taylor
• LTO symtab sections vs. missing symbols (libcalls maybe?) and lto-plugin vs. COFF   Ian Lance Taylor
• Trouble doing bootstrap   Ralf Wildenhues
• Trouble doing bootstrap   Ian Lance Taylor
• Trouble doing bootstrap   Ralf Wildenhues
• Trouble doing bootstrap   Ian Lance Taylor
• Trouble doing bootstrap   Joe Buck
• Trouble doing bootstrap   Joseph S. Myers
• "Ada.Exceptions.Exception_Propagation" is not a predefined library unit   Robert Dewar
• gcc-4.5-20101014 is now available   gccadmin@gcc.gnu.org
• show size of stack needed by functions   Weddington, Eric
• check_cxa_atexit_available   Mark Mitchell
• LTO symtab sections vs. missing symbols (libcalls maybe?) and lto-plugin vs. COFF   Dave Korn
• LTO symtab sections vs. missing symbols (libcalls maybe?) and lto-plugin vs. COFF   Dave Korn
• rehearsal of GCC Summit tutorial "Easily coding a GCC extension with MELT" (at IRILL, Paris, France oct.20th 2010)   Basile Starynkevitch
• -isysroot option ignored for crosscompiler?   Uros Bizjak
• dropping gccbug   Andi Kleen
• dropping gccbug   Joseph S. Myers
• LTO symtabs inconsistency   Dave Korn
• [trunk] hard-reg-set.h not installed in plugins/include   Basile Starynkevitch
• [trunk] hard-reg-set.h not installed in plugins/include   Basile Starynkevitch
• [trunk] hard-reg-set.h not installed in plugins/include   Basile Starynkevitch
• gcc-4.6-20101016 is now available   gccadmin@gcc.gnu.org
• LTO symtabs inconsistency   Dave Korn
• Who owns config.rpath?   Gerald Pfeifer
• LTO symtabs inconsistency   Jan Hubicka
• LTO symtabs inconsistency   Dave Korn
• gcc-4.3-20101017 is now available   gccadmin@gcc.gnu.org
• please help on makefile bug in MELT (plugin, not branch)   Basile Starynkevitch
• some questions to GCC steering commitee (at GCC Summit) related to documentation from code   Basile Starynkevitch
• some questions to GCC steering commitee (at GCC Summit) related to documentation from code   Jonathan Wakely
• some questions to GCC steering commitee (at GCC Summit) related to documentation from code   Jonathan Wakely
• some questions to GCC steering commitee (at GCC Summit) related to documentation from code   Gerald Pfeifer
• Laurynas Biveinis now gengtype reviewer   Mark Mitchell
• how to initialize a pointer using data page mode   Phung Nguyen
• GCSE problem on a gcc testsuite   johnc
• Laurynas Biveinis now gengtype reviewer   Laurynas Biveinis
• GCSE problem on a gcc testsuite   Eric Botcazou
• some questions to GCC steering commitee (at GCC Summit) related to documentation from code   Basile Starynkevitch
• Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC   Jie Zhang
• Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC   Andrey Belevantsev
• Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC   Jie Zhang
• Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC   Andrey Belevantsev
• ralloc UNSPEC vs UNSPEC_VOLATILE   Hariharan Sandanagobalane
• Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC   Nathan Froyd
• define_peepholes in mn10300   Jeff Law
• secondary reload via 2 intermediary registers   Jeff Law
• -isysroot option ignored for crosscompiler?   Kai Ruottu
• Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC   David Edelsohn
• Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC   Jeff Law
• define_peepholes in mn10300   Paolo Bonzini
• Constant initializers   Matt Fischer
• Constant initializers   Jonathan Wakely
• Constant initializers   Richard Henderson
• how to initialize a pointer using data page mode   Phung Nguyen
• how to initialize a pointer using data page mode   Ian Lance Taylor
• atomicity of x86 bt/bts/btr/btc?   Jay K
• atomicity of x86 bt/bts/btr/btc?   Rick C. Hodgin
• atomicity of x86 bt/bts/btr/btc?   Jay K
• atomicity of x86 bt/bts/btr/btc?   Rick C. Hodgin
• atomicity of x86 bt/bts/btr/btc?   Jay K
• Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ?   Frederic Riss
• secondary reload via 2 intermediary registers   Alex Turjan
• atomicity of x86 bt/bts/btr/btc?   Ian Lance Taylor
• Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ?   Ian Lance Taylor
• Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC   Jie Zhang
• Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC   Andrey Belevantsev
• Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC   Maxim Kuvyrkov
• Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC   Jie Zhang
• GCC RTX generation question   Radu Hobincu
• 4-15% speed-up in std::sort special case - is it worth the effort?   Gabriel Dos Reis
• Problem with equivalent memory handling   Jeff Law
• Plug-in Licensing   Justin Seyster
• Plug-in Licensing   Basile Starynkevitch
• GCC RTX generation question   Ian Lance Taylor
• Problem with equivalent memory handling   Ian Lance Taylor
• Plug-in Licensing   Ian Lance Taylor
• how to initialize a pointer using data page mode   Phung Nguyen
• *_ALIGN_MAX_SKIP macros   DJ Delorie
• Plug-in Licensing   Justin Seyster
• Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC   Paul Brook
• Hooks, macros and target configuration   Joseph S. Myers
• how to initialize a pointer using data page mode   Ian Lance Taylor
• Plug-in Licensing   Ian Lance Taylor
• gcc-4.4-20101019 is now available   gccadmin@gcc.gnu.org
• old aliasing bug: fixed?   Albert Cahalan
• Hooks, macros and target configuration   Richard Guenther
• old aliasing bug: fixed?   Richard Guenther
• GCC RTX generation question   Radu Hobincu
• GCC RTX generation question   Ian Lance Taylor
• Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC   Pat Haugen
• Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC   Jie Zhang
• peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead   Georg Lay
• GCC RTX generation question   Radu Hobincu
• Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ?   Frederic Riss
• Stadyum Derbi Özel Reklam Teklifi   Esra ALTAŞ
• Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ?   Nathan Froyd
• __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__   Neal Becker
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Gunther Nikl
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Michael Meissner
• peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead   Ian Lance Taylor
• __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__   Jonathan Wakely
• Describing multi-register values in RTL   Frederic Riss
• gcc-4.5-20101021 is now available   gccadmin@gcc.gnu.org
• Describing multi-register values in RTL   Ian Lance Taylor
• Describing multi-register values in RTL   Paul Koning
• -mcmodel=large doesn't work to me   Wei Li
• Describing multi-register values in RTL   Ian Lance Taylor
• -mcmodel=large doesn't work to me   Ian Lance Taylor
• Describing multi-register values in RTL   Frédéric RISS
• Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ?   Frederic Riss
• question on ssa representation of aggregates   Amker.Cheng
• peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead   Georg Lay
• Describing multi-register values in RTL   Ian Lance Taylor
• Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC   Pat Haugen
• Questions about selective scheduler and PowerPC   Jie Zhang
• The Linux binutils 2.20.51.0.12 is released   H.J. Lu
• Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ?   Ian Lance Taylor
• question on ssa representation of aggregates   Ian Lance Taylor
• peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead   Ian Lance Taylor
• G++ test suite picking up incorrect libstc++   Michael Eager
• G++ test suite picking up incorrect libstc++   Paolo Carlini
• G++ test suite picking up incorrect libstc++   Michael Eager
• G++ test suite picking up incorrect libstc++   H.J. Lu
• question on ssa representation of aggregates   Amker.Cheng
• G++ test suite picking up incorrect libstc++   Ralf Wildenhues
• G++ test suite picking up incorrect libstc++   Michael Eager
• peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead   Paolo Bonzini
• gcc-4.6-20101023 is now available   gccadmin@gcc.gnu.org
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Ian Lance Taylor
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Joseph S. Myers
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Dave Korn
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   H.J. Lu
• gcc-4.3-20101024 is now available   gccadmin@gcc.gnu.org
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Paolo Bonzini
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Ian Lance Taylor
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Ian Lance Taylor
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Andrew Pinski
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Ian Lance Taylor
• Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ?   Frederic Riss
• combiner   roy rosen
• Constant propagation and CSE   Frederic Riss
• peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead   Georg Lay
• peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead   Paolo Bonzini
• Is it possbile to hack I386 backend to make all function calls to be indirect function calling?   redriver jiang
• Constant propagation and CSE   Paolo Bonzini
• REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P   Paul Koning
• Is it possbile to hack I386 backend to make all function calls to be indirect function calling?   Andi Kleen
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Mark Mitchell
• movmemm pattern   Paul Koning
• Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ?   Ian Lance Taylor
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Ian Lance Taylor
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Andrew Pinski
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Andi Kleen
• [wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: new mirror   Gerald Pfeifer
• combiner   Ian Lance Taylor
• Is it possbile to hack I386 backend to make all function calls to be indirect function calling?   Ian Lance Taylor
• movmemm pattern   Richard Guenther
• REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P   Ian Lance Taylor
• Is it possbile to hack I386 backend to make all function calls to be indirect function calling?   Jan Hubicka
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Dave Korn
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Mark Mitchell
• movmemm pattern   Paul Koning
• movmemm pattern   Dave Korn
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Dave Korn
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Mark Mitchell
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Frank Ch. Eigler
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Mark Mitchell
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Frank Ch. Eigler
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Mark Mitchell
• inline assembly vs. intrinsic functions   roy rosen
• inline assembly vs. intrinsic functions   Ian Lance Taylor
• inline assembly vs. intrinsic functions   roy rosen
• Constant propagation and CSE   Jeff Law
• movmemm pattern   Joseph S. Myers
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Joseph S. Myers
• inline assembly vs. intrinsic functions   roy rosen
• Default initialization value...   Bruce Korb
• Problem with equivalent memory handling   Jeff Law
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Mark Mitchell
• Describing multi-register values in RTL   Jeff Law
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Ian Lance Taylor
• inline assembly vs. intrinsic functions   Ian Lance Taylor
• Problem with equivalent memory handling   Ian Lance Taylor
• movmemm pattern   Paul Koning
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Andi Kleen
• movmemm pattern   Dave Korn
• movmemm pattern   Paul Koning
• peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead   Georg Lay
• combiner   Georg Lay
• peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead   Paolo Bonzini
• movmemm pattern   Richard Guenther
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Joakim Tjernlund
• gcc-4.4-20101026 is now available   gccadmin@gcc.gnu.org
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Dave Korn
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Alan Modra
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Joakim Tjernlund
• Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ?   Jon Beniston
• peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead   Georg Lay
• gengtype installation (where, how)?   Basile Starynkevitch
• %pc relative addressing of string literals/const data   Dave Korn
• peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead   Paolo Bonzini
• peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead   Georg Lay
• peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead   Paolo Bonzini
• GCC 4.6.0 Status Report (2010-10-27)   Jakub Jelinek
• Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ?   Frédéric RISS
• Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ?   Nathan Froyd
• Constant propagation and CSE   Frederic Riss
• Sorry for abrupt departure   Jeff Law
• Constant propagation and CSE   Jeff Law
• Constant propagation and CSE   Frederic Riss
• define_split   roy rosen
• peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead   Paolo Bonzini
• peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead   Georg Lay
• peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead   Paolo Bonzini
• peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead   Georg Lay
• peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead   Georg Lay
• Is Ada 2005 Issue AI-0157 implemented correctly in GCC 4.6.0?   John Marino
• Is Ada 2005 Issue AI-0157 implemented correctly in GCC 4.6.0?   Robert Dewar
• Is Ada 2005 Issue AI-0157 implemented correctly in GCC 4.6.0?   John Marino
• Help with reloading FP + offset addressing mode   Mohamed Shafi
• Is Ada 2005 Issue AI-0157 implemented correctly in GCC 4.6.0?   Arnaud Charlet
• peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead   Paolo Bonzini
• Fwd: NEW GCC build failure, HEAD@166030 on native   Andrew Pinski
• Fwd: NEW GCC build failure, HEAD@166030 on native   Paolo Bonzini
• gcc-4.5-20101028 is now available   gccadmin@gcc.gnu.org
• simple for loop on g++ 4.4.3   eric lin
• simple for loop on g++ 4.4.3   Jonathan Wakely
• A Framework for GCC Plug-ins   Justin Seyster
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Ian Lance Taylor
• define_split   Ian Lance Taylor
• define_split   roy rosen
• Help with reloading FP + offset addressing mode   Mohamed Shafi
• Benchmarks for Pointer Analysis   Swaroop Joshi
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Dave Korn
• g++ produces crazy code for STL container   Zeev Tarantov
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   IainS
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Jack Howarth
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Richard Guenther
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Dave Korn
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Dave Korn
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Ian Lance Taylor
• define_split   Ian Lance Taylor
• Preprocessor (cpp) separate binary   Artem Shinkarov
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Jack Howarth
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Mark Mitchell
• g++ produces crazy code for STL container   Ian Lance Taylor
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Ian Lance Taylor
• peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead   Georg Lay
• peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead   Paolo Bonzini
• Preprocessor (cpp) separate binary   Ian Lance Taylor
• Preprocessor (cpp) separate binary   Artem Shinkarov
• Preprocessor (cpp) separate binary   Basile Starynkevitch
• peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead   Georg Lay
• peephole2: dead regs not marked as dead   Paolo Bonzini
• Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ?   Jon Beniston
• GCC Summit 2010 papers and presentations   Diego Novillo
• Preprocessor (cpp) separate binary   Ian Lance Taylor
• TARGET_VALID_POINTER_MODE unused?   Paul Koning
• TARGET_VALID_POINTER_MODE unused?   Andrew Pinski
• gcc's(4.4.3) math lib :power   eric lin
• gcc's(4.4.3) math lib :power   Paolo Carlini
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Ian Lance Taylor
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   H.J. Lu
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Ian Lance Taylor
• Help with reloading FP + offset addressing mode   Joern Rennecke
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Richard Henderson
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   H.J. Lu
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Dave Korn
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Paolo Bonzini
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Dave Korn
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Dave Korn
• TARGET_VALID_POINTER_MODE unused?   Paul Koning
• [PATCH] Enable linker plugin for windows [was Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend]   Dave Korn
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Richard Henderson
• A Framework for GCC Plug-ins   Grigori Fursin
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Dave Korn
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Richard Henderson
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Dave Korn
• RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity   H.J. Lu
• RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity   Frank Ch. Eigler
• RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity   H.J. Lu
• gcc-4.6-20101030 is now available   gccadmin@gcc.gnu.org
• CASES'10 paper related to MILEPOST GCC   Grigori Fursin
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Ian Lance Taylor
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Ian Lance Taylor
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Ian Lance Taylor
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Florian Weimer
• TARGET_VALID_POINTER_MODE unused?   Ian Lance Taylor
• RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity   Ian Lance Taylor
• Discussion about merging Go frontend   Ian Lance Taylor
• RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity   H.J. Lu
• dual result function & ABI (using extra register), e.g. for Go   Basile Starynkevitch
• PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default   Ian Lance Taylor
• dual result function & ABI (using extra register), e.g. for Go   Joern Rennecke
• RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity   Ian Lance Taylor
• dual result function & ABI (using extra register), e.g. for Go   Ian Lance Taylor
• PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default   Steven Bosscher
• gcc-4.3-20101031 is now available   gccadmin@gcc.gnu.org
• PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default   Gerald Pfeifer
• RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity   Weddington, Eric

Last message date: Sun Oct 31 19:53:00 GMT 2010
Archived on: Sat May 2 13:44:02 GMT 2020

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...