Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ?
Jon Beniston
jon@beniston.com
Fri Oct 29 17:39:00 GMT 2010
Hi Fred,
> If you have access to a lm32 toolchain, can you test if gcc.c-
> torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c passes at different optimization levels?
For a SVN snapshot from yesterday, patched so it fixes the problem Nathan mentioned:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution, -O2 -flto
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution, -O2 -fwhopr
Cheers,
Jon
More information about the Gcc
mailing list