Bug in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver ?

Jon Beniston jon@beniston.com
Fri Oct 29 17:39:00 GMT 2010


Hi Fred,

> If you have access to a lm32 toolchain, can you test if gcc.c-
> torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c passes at different optimization levels?

For a SVN snapshot from yesterday, patched so it fixes the problem Nathan mentioned:

FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution,  -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution,  -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution,  -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution,  -O2 -flto
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution,  -O2 -fwhopr

Cheers,
Jon




More information about the Gcc mailing list