This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: git conversion in progress

From: "Eric S. Raymond" <esr at thyrsus dot com>
To: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at netcologne dot de>
Cc: Martin Liška <mliska at suse dot cz>, Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Richard Earnshaw <Richard dot Earnshaw at foss dot arm dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 12:37:56 -0500
Subject: Re: git conversion in progress
References: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2001110102500.13991@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <c6d133b9-ed9c-1f9e-42d9-a6eb18db5714@foss.arm.com> <alpine.DEB.2.21.2001111435500.11885@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <6d4f4785-e163-9fa5-5896-ddec7a678c66@netcologne.de> <57c4a15a-71be-f823-feaa-4b0006632e3c@suse.cz> <ce3f821f-df14-17aa-3285-b33060c175df@netcologne.de>
Reply-to: esr at thyrsus dot com

Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>:
> Hm... I just hope this is a one-time effect, and isn't an indication
> that git uses much more resources, server-side, so the current
> infrastructure is not up to the task.  Is git that much more
> resource hungry than svn? Or is this unrelated?

Almost certanly unrelated. In normal use git is *spectacularly* faster than
SVN on equivalent operations. 
-- 
		<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>

References:
- git conversion in progress
  - From: Joseph Myers
- Re: git conversion in progress
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: git conversion in progress
  - From: Joseph Myers
- Re: git conversion in progress
  - From: Thomas Koenig
- Re: git conversion in progress
  - From: Martin Liška
- Re: git conversion in progress
  - From: Thomas Koenig

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]