This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?

From: Phil Edwards <phil at codesourcery dot com>
To: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
Cc: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>, S dot Bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl, aph at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, jbuck at synopsys dot com, rth at redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:24:14 -0400
Subject: Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
References: <200309191343.h8JDhtY3022417@caip.rutgers.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309191401570.14767-100000@ops2.one-point.com>

On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 02:06:01PM -0400, Jeff Sturm wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> 
> > (Still having several different intermittant parallel build problems.)
> 
> rth mentioned serializing the configury once.  I'm guessing that may have
> been removed during the top-level autoconfiguration.  Anyway, it sounds
> like there is now a better understanding of the problem.

Toplevel configure still prints this during --help:

  --enable-serial-[{host,target,build}-]configure
                          Force sequential configuration of
                          sub-packages for the host, target or build
                          machine, or all sub-packages

I haven't tried using any of those options.


-- 
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
    - Brian W. Kernighan

References:
- Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
  - From: Jeff Sturm

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]