gcc archive
author index for September, 2003

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

Canqun Yang

• 2003-09-20 13:19 Software Pipelining in GCC
• 2003-09-21 00:26 TO: Jim Wilson, Deepak B. Nayak, Ritu, ...

chen haibo

• 2003-09-28 14:37 Porting GCC troubles : about register window
• 2003-09-30 03:20 Re: Porting GCC troubles : about register window
• 2003-09-30 13:12 Re: Porting GCC troubles : about register window

Anders Ådland

• 2003-09-05 13:42 More help to my port.
• 2003-09-05 14:01 More help to my port. nospam
• 2003-09-08 08:56 Re: More help to my port.
• 2003-09-15 14:18 The address of a symbol_ref

Etienne Lorrain

• 2003-09-26 10:54 GCC and memory segments

Håkan Hjort

• 2003-09-06 23:39 Re: inlining failed

Manuel Báez Larraín

• 2003-09-15 19:58 InLine
• 2003-09-15 20:06 RE: InLine

Pop Sébastian

• 2003-09-04 12:01 [tree-ssa] SSA bug or feature?
• 2003-09-04 12:28 Re: [tree-ssa] SSA bug or feature?
• 2003-09-04 13:19 Re: [tree-ssa] SSA bug or feature?

Laczó Tibor

• 2003-09-12 13:11 memory allocation

Branko Äibej

• 2003-09-24 00:27 Re: what with the logo

Adam Megacz

• 2003-09-08 04:31 instructions for building a cross-toolchain targeting Darwin

Agung Andik Wibawa

• 2003-09-23 02:17 Sekali sms ke hp siapapun dapat 250

Ahern, Charles J

• 2003-09-03 20:46 Exceptions won't work in my dll!

Alan Modra

• 2003-09-12 12:38 Re: 3.4 installation problems: libc is somewhere unusual
• 2003-09-12 13:40 Re: 3.4 installation problems: libc is somewhere unusual
• 2003-09-17 02:07 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-17 03:40 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-19 11:27 Re: Does GASP continue existing?
• 2003-09-23 04:53 Re: [hppa-linux] HEAD broken?

Albert Chin

• 2003-09-04 15:52 Re: HP's compiler crashes when building gcc from trunk

Alexandre Courbot

• 2003-09-07 10:39 casesi pattern failure
• 2003-09-16 16:07 Controlling what kind of value ends in a register
• 2003-09-17 12:19 Re: RTL templates names
• 2003-09-17 12:50 Re: [gcc] Re: RTL templates names
• 2003-09-17 13:16 Dynamic FUNCTION_OUTGOING_VALUE?
• 2003-09-18 11:01 Re: Dynamic FUNCTION_OUTGOING_VALUE?
• 2003-09-19 14:17 Promotion of integer return types to int
• 2003-09-19 14:24 Re: Dynamic FUNCTION_OUTGOING_VALUE?
• 2003-09-23 09:09 DECL_RESULT not available for declared (but not defined) function?
• 2003-09-24 09:57 Abusive (?) promotions to int
• 2003-09-24 12:07 Re: Abusive (?) promotions to int
• 2003-09-25 06:38 Re: Dynamic FUNCTION_OUTGOING_VALUE?

Alexandre Oliva

• 2003-09-04 05:37 Re: [toplevel] Gas install name problem from autoconf 2.5x
• 2003-09-04 05:40 Re: [toplevel] Gas install name problem from autoconf 2.5x
• 2003-09-05 04:27 Re: libjava doesn't build with new cp/*
• 2003-09-06 19:49 Re: More help to my port.
• 2003-09-13 20:39 Re: gcc_tooldir
• 2003-09-17 20:58 Re: Gcc 3.3 regressions
• 2003-09-18 00:37 Re: Gcc 3.3 regressions
• 2003-09-22 15:07 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-29 16:13 Re: Worm and virus free code.

Andi Kleen

• 2003-09-04 21:52 Re: [RFC/RFA?] Enabling unit-at-a-time for -O2 and increasing inline limits
• 2003-09-29 12:22 Re: inline asm constraints for conditions

Andreas Jaeger

• 2003-09-02 04:48 mainline bootstrap failure in treelang
• 2003-09-02 07:21 Fix langhooks-defs.h (was Re: mainline bootstrap failure intreelang)
• 2003-09-02 08:41 Re: _Unwind_RaiseException incompatibility?
• 2003-09-02 16:40 Re: Exceptions, Optimizations and AIX
• 2003-09-05 08:54 Re: Vtable incompatibility between GCC 3.0/3.2?
• 2003-09-05 13:33 Re: Vtable incompatibility between GCC 3.0/3.2?
• 2003-09-06 17:05 Re: inlining failed
• 2003-09-06 17:44 Re: inlining failed
• 2003-09-14 14:07 Re: gcc 3.4, error: conflicting types for local extern variabled
• 2003-09-14 14:10 Re: yacc/bison build errors on current CVS
• 2003-09-14 14:23 Re: gcc 3.4, error: conflicting types for local extern variabled
• 2003-09-15 13:20 Re: yacc/bison build errors on current CVS
• 2003-09-16 15:43 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-17 06:16 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-17 19:35 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-21 15:15 Re: Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c

Andreas Schwab

• 2003-09-04 14:45 Re: Duplicate constraint characters in mn10300.h
• 2003-09-05 21:21 Re: m68k: cfa_offset VS cfa_store_offset
• 2003-09-05 22:40 Re: m68k: cfa_offset VS cfa_store_offset
• 2003-09-06 13:04 Crash in libjava
• 2003-09-07 17:29 Re: Shell portability question
• 2003-09-08 11:22 Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64
• 2003-09-12 10:23 Mainline bootstrap failure
• 2003-09-12 13:45 Re: 3.4 installation problems: libc is somewhere unusual
• 2003-09-14 14:47 Re: gcc 3.4, error: conflicting types for local extern variabled
• 2003-09-14 15:11 Re: gcc 3.4, error: conflicting types for local extern variabled
• 2003-09-15 07:55 Re: m68k call_value insn
• 2003-09-15 09:14 Re: m68k target deprecations
• 2003-09-15 13:31 Re: m68k call_value insn
• 2003-09-16 09:42 [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on ia64
• 2003-09-17 08:25 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on ia64
• 2003-09-23 19:29 Re: Arrays and Alignment
• 2003-09-24 08:48 Re: Arrays and Alignment
• 2003-09-24 10:16 Re: Abusive (?) promotions to int
• 2003-09-29 19:58 Re: Trying to build on DYNIX/ptx: 'strbuf' in cppcharset.c

Andreas Tobler

• 2003-09-01 10:02 Re: bootstrap failure i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2003-09-07 15:34 Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64
• 2003-09-07 16:39 Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64
• 2003-09-07 18:14 Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64
• 2003-09-07 20:10 Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64
• 2003-09-23 05:33 Re: libffi test suite maintainer

Andrew Haley

• 2003-09-03 10:18 why gcj is slower than jvm
• 2003-09-12 13:50 [tree-ssa] Java: Decls that alias?
• 2003-09-13 09:23 generate_bytecode_insn - tree code not implemented: min_expr
• 2003-09-15 10:57 Re: generate_bytecode_insn - tree code not implemented: min_expr
• 2003-09-16 15:20 Re: [tree-ssa] Java: Decls that alias?
• 2003-09-16 15:31 Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-16 15:42 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-16 15:47 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-16 16:06 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-16 16:17 RE: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-16 16:53 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-17 15:32 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-20 04:54 Re: [tree-ssa] Java: Decls that alias?
• 2003-09-21 21:55 Re: Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c
• 2003-09-22 08:42 Re: Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c
• 2003-09-22 10:57 RE: Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c
• 2003-09-22 11:02 RE: Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c
• 2003-09-22 12:07 Re: Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c
• 2003-09-23 09:49 Gcc To-Do list
• 2003-09-24 18:14 Handling aliases in debug information
• 2003-09-26 07:01 Really, really const
• 2003-09-26 07:59 Re: Really, really const
• 2003-09-26 08:26 Re: Really, really const
• 2003-09-26 08:32 Re: Really, really const
• 2003-09-26 09:00 Re: Really, really const
• 2003-09-26 09:15 Re: Really, really const
• 2003-09-26 10:57 Re: Really, really const

Andrew MacLeod

• 2003-09-10 13:48 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in coalesce_abnormal_edges, merge frommainline?
• 2003-09-10 14:41 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in coalesce_abnormal_edges, merge frommainline?
• 2003-09-10 14:49 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in coalesce_abnormal_edges, merge frommainline?
• 2003-09-10 16:30 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in coalesce_abnormal_edges, merge frommainline?
• 2003-09-10 16:34 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in coalesce_abnormal_edges, merge frommainline?
• 2003-09-10 17:05 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in coalesce_abnormal_edges, merge frommainline?
• 2003-09-10 17:07 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in coalesce_abnormal_edges, merge frommainline?
• 2003-09-10 18:34 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in coalesce_abnormal_edges, merge frommainline?
• 2003-09-10 21:38 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in coalesce_abnormal_edges, merge frommainline?
• 2003-09-19 17:03 Re: [tree-ssa] Memory usage in compute_immediate_uses

Andrew Pinski

• 2003-09-01 04:18 Re: Does GCC support TLS or SEH?
• 2003-09-01 05:35 Re: tree-ssa merge from mainline?
• 2003-09-01 05:46 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap on IRIX 6.5
• 2003-09-02 03:00 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux
• 2003-09-03 17:05 Re: gcc problem with new kde build
• 2003-09-04 14:46 Re: Function declaration issues
• 2003-09-07 15:27 Re: strange compiling problem
• 2003-09-07 22:59 Another reload problem/bug on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-09-08 04:01 Re: Question about "match_dup"
• 2003-09-09 01:26 Re: how to access PC
• 2003-09-18 04:23 Re: gcc 3.3.2 build regression
• 2003-09-19 14:44 [Patch, Applied] Re: array11.C failing on all LP64 targets
• 2003-09-27 18:51 [PATCH] [tree-ssa] another miscompile due to BOOL_TYPE_SIZE being INT_TYPE_SIZE (bootstrap failure on ppc-apple-darwin)
• 2003-09-28 05:54 Re: [PATCH] [tree-ssa] another miscompile due to BOOL_TYPE_SIZE being INT_TYPE_SIZE (bootstrap failure on ppc-apple-darwin)

Andrew Zabolotny

• 2003-09-07 19:42 passing regparm floating-point args in FPU registers

Anthony Green

• 2003-09-06 01:03 New linux cross mingw32 build ICE
• 2003-09-17 18:19 Re: libffi test suite maintainer

Arnold Cole

• 2003-09-12 03:28 Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type

Arnold Vogelsang

• 2003-09-19 10:39 Successful build of gcc-3.3.1 on i586-pc-linux-gnu
• 2003-09-30 13:34 Successful build of gcc-3.3.1 on alpha-dec-osf4.0f

Art Haas

• 2003-09-02 14:19 Bootstrap failures building libstdc++ on i586-pc-linux-gnu
• 2003-09-16 19:32 A user's experiences with GCC-3.4 snapshots
• 2003-09-16 19:57 Re: A user's experiences with GCC-3.4 snapshots
• 2003-09-17 12:56 Re: A user's experiences with GCC-3.4 snapshots

Ayal Zaks

• 2003-09-22 08:40 Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC

Bayu Notonegoro

• 2003-09-24 12:38 ask g77

Ben Stanley

• 2003-09-06 02:42 Ada libraries and tasking on powerpc-*-linux-gnu

Benjamin Kosnik

• 2003-09-01 10:00 bootstrap failure i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2003-09-01 10:10 Re: static link
• 2003-09-10 13:43 query on build and test times
• 2003-09-19 13:34 Re: libstdc++-v3 testsuite bug -- uninitialized variable

Bernardo Innocenti

• 2003-09-03 10:54 Re: DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help
• 2003-09-05 21:05 m68k: cfa_offset VS cfa_store_offset
• 2003-09-05 21:49 m68k: attribute((interrupt_handler))
• 2003-09-05 22:01 Re: m68k: cfa_offset VS cfa_store_offset
• 2003-09-11 18:27 Re: ICE with your gcc 3.3 toolchain
• 2003-09-11 21:41 m68k target deprecations
• 2003-09-13 16:34 Re: m68k target deprecations
• 2003-09-14 23:15 m68k call_value insn
• 2003-09-15 13:14 Re: m68k call_value insn
• 2003-09-15 19:44 Re: m68k call_value insn

Bernd Jendrissek

• 2003-09-19 14:42 Re: what with the logo
• 2003-09-25 08:44 Re: GCC and memory segments
• 2003-09-26 09:07 Re: GCC and memory segments

Billinghurst, David (CRTS)

• 2003-09-01 06:38 RE: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap on IRIX 6.5

Bob Rossi

• 2003-09-17 18:23 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc

Bradley Lucier

• 2003-09-08 18:01 C++ maintainers: Please review possible fix for bootstrap [12168]
• 2003-09-16 19:27 Scheduling for one processor variant, but reporting times for others
• 2003-09-16 19:30 Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-16 19:53 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-17 01:42 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-17 01:44 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-17 03:22 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-17 15:45 Re: Scheduling for one processor variant, but reporting times for others
• 2003-09-23 19:36 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-25 04:37 Some benchmarks with Apple's -fast
• 2003-09-25 17:21 Re: Some benchmarks with Apple's -fast

Brandon Dailey

• 2003-09-05 19:59 Help with gcc

Bruce Stephens

• 2003-09-29 22:53 Re: C++ language lawyer question
• 2003-09-29 23:29 Re: C++ language lawyer question

Bruce Tang

• 2003-09-10 02:32 avr-gcc 3.3-tinyos

Bryce McKinlay

• 2003-09-24 23:30 Re: [3.3.2] regressions on the branch (pack-test-2.c, parameter-declaration-1.C)

Bud Davis

• 2003-09-05 00:03 RE: possible small bug in g77 when writing direct access files
• 2003-09-05 00:38 RE: possible small bug in g77 when writing direct access files

Camm Maguire

• 2003-09-05 22:42 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: recent commit
• 2003-09-09 19:31 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: recent commit

Carlo Wood

• 2003-09-01 11:24 Re: static link
• 2003-09-19 14:13 Need help with fixing this two year old backend bug in mainline.
• 2003-09-21 14:41 Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c
• 2003-09-21 22:43 Re: Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c
• 2003-09-21 23:27 Re: Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c
• 2003-09-22 00:17 RFC: debug line info & inlining; patch proposal and request for comments.
• 2003-09-22 11:16 Re: Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c
• 2003-09-22 14:58 Re: integral location_t
• 2003-09-23 14:20 [tree-ssa] DWARF2 debug info missing.
• 2003-09-24 11:41 Re: integral location_t
• 2003-09-25 21:16 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla
• 2003-09-27 11:11 Re: HUGE compilation time / memory requirement in compilation of single file
• 2003-09-27 12:49 RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only.

Carlos O'Donell

• 2003-09-22 02:24 [hppa-linux] HEAD broken?
• 2003-09-22 02:49 Re: [hppa-linux] HEAD broken?
• 2003-09-23 22:43 Re: [hppa-linux] HEAD broken?

Chris Devers

• 2003-09-01 17:41 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers
• 2003-09-01 17:59 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers
• 2003-09-01 18:55 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers
• 2003-09-01 19:50 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb
• 2003-09-01 21:14 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb
• 2003-09-01 21:23 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb
• 2003-09-01 22:23 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb
• 2003-09-02 14:32 [using gcc book] ch1 rewrite
• 2003-09-02 16:14 Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings
• 2003-09-02 16:45 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 rewrite
• 2003-09-02 19:05 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 rewrite
• 2003-09-02 20:07 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 rewrite
• 2003-09-02 21:14 Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings
• 2003-09-02 21:35 [using gcc book] final credits
• 2003-09-03 03:09 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 rewrite
• 2003-09-03 03:14 Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings

Chris Lattner

• 2003-09-10 03:58 GCC Induction Variable Terminology
• 2003-09-17 18:04 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc

Christian Joensson

• 2003-09-15 08:50 Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD 20030915 on i786-cygwin: ICE in libgcc2.c: In function `__popcountsi2': libgcc.c:751 internal compiler error...
• 2003-09-16 10:34 RE: Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD 20030915 on i786-cygwin: ICE in libgcc2.c: In function `__popcountsi2': libgcc.c:751 internal compiler error...
• 2003-09-24 18:11 Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD 20030924 on sparc64-linux: LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC redefined

Christopher Faylor

• 2003-09-04 01:49 Re: please do not add "nospam" to your gcc list email titles
• 2003-09-05 20:38 Re: More help to my port. nospam ("nospam" subjects are now BLOCKED)

Colin Douglas Howell

• 2003-09-02 21:51 [OT] fate of cygnus.com
• 2003-09-03 14:18 Re: text positioning

Cook, Kelley (R.K.)

• 2003-09-15 14:01 Re: Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD 20030915 on i786-cygwin: ICE in libgcc2.c: In function `__popcountsi2': libgcc.c:751 internal compiler error...

Corey Ernst

• 2003-09-29 16:47 gcc3.2 slow link time

Dale Johannesen

• 2003-09-15 19:21 RFC: improve induction variable choice
• 2003-09-30 20:56 Re: Sibcall arguments passed on the stack

Dan Kegel

• 2003-09-01 16:01 re: STP for automated GCC testing
• 2003-09-04 05:39 Getting a copy of SPEC CPU2000 for gcc-3.4 performance regressiontesting...
• 2003-09-04 14:27 ancient bounds checking gcc patch updated for gcc-3.3.1
• 2003-09-11 18:08 Re: /lib/libstdc++.so.5: no version information available
• 2003-09-13 00:45 Preparing patch to add testcases for 8 sh pr's
• 2003-09-13 15:00 re: memory allocation

Daniel Berlin

• 2003-09-01 05:47 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap on IRIX 6.5
• 2003-09-02 04:08 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux
• 2003-09-02 04:15 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux
• 2003-09-07 14:43 Re: Bugzilla question
• 2003-09-08 18:05 PCH assumes there is no information before the object
• 2003-09-08 19:48 Re: PCH assumes there is no information before the object
• 2003-09-08 23:35 Re: PCH assumes there is no information before the object
• 2003-09-08 23:37 Re: PCH assumes there is no information before the object
• 2003-09-09 03:22 Re: PCH assumes there is no information before the object
• 2003-09-10 15:32 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in coalesce_abnormal_edges, merge from mainline?
• 2003-09-10 16:57 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in coalesce_abnormal_edges, merge from mainline?
• 2003-09-10 16:58 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in coalesce_abnormal_edges, merge from mainline?
• 2003-09-10 17:09 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in coalesce_abnormal_edges, merge from mainline?
• 2003-09-10 17:15 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in coalesce_abnormal_edges, merge from mainline?
• 2003-09-10 17:20 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in coalesce_abnormal_edges, merge from mainline?
• 2003-09-10 18:07 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in coalesce_abnormal_edges, merge from mainline?
• 2003-09-15 20:00 Re: InLine
• 2003-09-15 20:09 RE: InLine
• 2003-09-16 16:14 RE: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-16 18:46 Copying collection and our ggc_collect practices
• 2003-09-16 20:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Memory usage in compute_immediate_uses
• 2003-09-17 19:35 Re: Copying collection and our ggc_collect practices
• 2003-09-17 20:14 Re: Copying collection and our ggc_collect practices
• 2003-09-18 04:36 Re: Copying collection and our ggc_collect practices
• 2003-09-19 13:04 RE: what with the logo
• 2003-09-25 17:31 Starting to track patches through bugzilla
• 2003-09-25 17:34 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla
• 2003-09-25 21:39 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla
• 2003-09-26 14:36 Re: [tree-ssa]quick SSAPRE question
• 2003-09-26 22:05 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla
• 2003-09-27 01:13 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla
• 2003-09-27 16:38 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla
• 2003-09-27 17:45 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla
• 2003-09-27 20:19 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla
• 2003-09-27 21:03 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla
• 2003-09-30 01:17 Re: DWARF debugging format implementation
• 2003-09-30 18:49 Re: DWARF debugging format implementation
• 2003-09-30 19:42 Re: DWARF debugging format implementation

Daniel Jacobowitz

• 2003-09-03 04:10 [toplevel] Gas install name problem from autoconf 2.5x
• 2003-09-03 14:49 Re: [toplevel] Gas install name problem from autoconf 2.5x
• 2003-09-03 16:56 Re: [toplevel] Gas install name problem from autoconf 2.5x
• 2003-09-05 14:39 Re: static runtime linking and libgcc/libgcc_s
• 2003-09-07 03:59 Re: [toplevel] Gas install name problem from autoconf 2.5x
• 2003-09-07 17:12 Shell portability question
• 2003-09-07 17:33 Re: [toplevel] Gas install name problem from autoconf 2.5x
• 2003-09-12 21:27 Re: gcc_tooldir
• 2003-09-12 22:37 Re: gcc_tooldir
• 2003-09-13 17:44 Bugzilla "accept" button
• 2003-09-14 14:32 Re: yacc/bison build errors on current CVS
• 2003-09-14 19:32 Dependency problems for options.o?
• 2003-09-15 14:28 Re: yacc/bison build errors on current CVS
• 2003-09-16 15:35 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-16 18:33 [tree-ssa] Memory usage in compute_immediate_uses
• 2003-09-16 19:48 Re: A user's experiences with GCC-3.4 snapshots
• 2003-09-16 23:14 Re: [tree-ssa] Memory usage in compute_immediate_uses
• 2003-09-18 12:26 Re: system.h causes bootstrap failure
• 2003-09-22 02:31 Re: [hppa-linux] HEAD broken?
• 2003-09-26 14:24 Re: printing 64-bit numbers in HEX
• 2003-09-26 14:26 Re: Bizarre symbol names generated by g++
• 2003-09-30 21:38 Re: DWARF debugging format implementation

Darragh O'Brien

• 2003-09-16 11:14 Local variable memory allocation
• 2003-09-16 15:17 Re: Local variable memory allocation

Dave Hudson

• 2003-09-02 08:30 Re: VSTa user wanted for testing configuration patch

David Carlton

• 2003-09-30 15:33 Re: DWARF debugging format implementation
• 2003-09-30 19:37 Re: DWARF debugging format implementation
• 2003-09-30 21:55 Re: DWARF debugging format implementation

David Edelsohn

• 2003-09-02 14:19 Re: Exceptions, Optimizations and AIX
• 2003-09-02 17:13 Re: Exceptions, Optimizations and AIX
• 2003-09-02 19:19 Re: 'make all' fails with ICE at cp/call.c: 4571
• 2003-09-05 20:11 Re: Patch to decl2.c
• 2003-09-07 21:32 Re: PR 11319
• 2003-09-09 14:10 Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64
• 2003-09-11 15:25 C++ testsuite failures on AIX
• 2003-09-11 19:17 Re: C++ testsuite failures on AIX
• 2003-09-11 19:28 Re: C++ testsuite failures on AIX
• 2003-09-11 19:44 Re: C++ testsuite failures on AIX
• 2003-09-12 20:48 Re: Patches to C++ front end have caused numerous regressions
• 2003-09-12 21:21 Re: Patches to C++ front end have caused numerous regressions
• 2003-09-12 22:14 Re: Patches to C++ front end have caused numerous regressions
• 2003-09-13 01:20 Re: Patches to C++ front end have caused numerous regressions
• 2003-09-16 21:12 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-19 14:07 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-23 02:22 Re: libffi test suite maintainer
• 2003-09-25 04:11 Re: Parallel build broken on i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2003-09-25 05:00 Re: Some benchmarks with Apple's -fast
• 2003-09-28 00:39 Re: C++ testsuite failures on AIX
• 2003-09-29 14:37 Vladimir Makarov appointed GCC scheduler co-maintainer
• 2003-09-29 17:17 Re: inline asm constraints for conditions
• 2003-09-29 19:45 Re: inline asm constraints for conditions

David Howells

• 2003-09-26 18:07 inline asm constraints for conditions
• 2003-09-30 12:19 Re: inline asm constraints for conditions

David Mosberger

• 2003-09-02 18:28 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: recent commit
• 2003-09-06 00:16 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: recent commit

Denis Chertykov

• 2003-09-11 18:42 Re: Looking for a GCC hacker

dennis jacob

• 2003-09-23 10:57 help for doubts

Devang Patel

• 2003-09-03 02:54 Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives?
• 2003-09-19 20:22 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour
• 2003-09-30 00:42 DWARF debugging format implementation
• 2003-09-30 18:44 Re: DWARF debugging format implementation

Diego Novillo

• 2003-09-02 01:42 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux
• 2003-09-02 12:22 Re: tree-ssa merge from mainline?
• 2003-09-02 18:07 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux
• 2003-09-02 20:22 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in pretty-printer
• 2003-09-02 21:28 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in pretty-printer
• 2003-09-02 22:17 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in pretty-printer
• 2003-09-02 23:53 Re: [tree-ssa] almost bootstraps...
• 2003-09-03 23:37 [tree-ssa] g95 SEGV building libgfortran
• 2003-09-04 12:42 Re: [tree-ssa] SSA bug or feature?
• 2003-09-04 20:18 Re: [tree-ssa] g95 SEGV building libgfortran
• 2003-09-04 20:31 Re: [tree-ssa] g95 SEGV building libgfortran
• 2003-09-04 21:02 Re: [tree-ssa] g95 SEGV building libgfortran
• 2003-09-05 12:36 Re: [tree-ssa] g95 SEGV building libgfortran
• 2003-09-05 12:39 Re: [tree-ssa] g95 SEGV building libgfortran
• 2003-09-05 12:45 Re: what do I need to do to become a GCC contributor?
• 2003-09-09 13:44 Re: [tree-ssa] Minor update for project web page - vectorization
• 2003-09-10 13:39 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in coalesce_abnormal_edges, merge frommainline?
• 2003-09-11 13:25 Re: [tree-ssa] Make check bombs my system onnoncompile/20010425-1.c
• 2003-09-11 16:20 Re: [tree-ssa] Make check bombs my system onnoncompile/20010425-1.c
• 2003-09-12 13:18 [tree-ssa] Your change to testsuite/ChangeLog
• 2003-09-16 19:35 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on ia64
• 2003-09-16 19:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Memory usage in compute_immediate_uses
• 2003-09-16 20:30 Re: [tree-ssa] Memory usage in compute_immediate_uses
• 2003-09-16 20:52 Re: [tree-ssa] Memory usage in compute_immediate_uses
• 2003-09-18 13:12 [tree-ssa] Branch broken
• 2003-09-20 13:01 [tree-ssa] libgfortran build error in intrinsics/random.c

DJ Delorie

• 2003-09-03 01:09 Re: implementing conio.h
• 2003-09-03 15:31 Re: [toplevel] Gas install name problem from autoconf 2.5x
• 2003-09-24 12:11 Re: What else can I disable fixproto for?

don fisher

• 2003-09-18 19:31 Weekly gcc images

Don Lindsay

• 2003-09-12 18:55 Re: m68k target deprecations

Dorit Naishlos

• 2003-09-02 20:12 Re: Bootstrap failures building libstdc++ on i586-pc-linux-gnu
• 2003-09-08 13:16 Re: [tree-ssa] Minor update for project web page - vectorization
• 2003-09-09 20:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Minor update for project web page - vectorization
• 2003-09-09 20:54 Re: SIMD support (was Re: [tree-ssa] Minor update for project web page- vectorization)
• 2003-09-10 08:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Minor update for project web page - vectorization

Doru Carastan

• 2003-09-29 21:28 gcc-3.2: config problem
• 2003-09-30 17:36 Re: gcc-3.2: config problem

Douglas Kilpatrick

• 2003-09-17 18:16 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-17 18:29 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc

E. Weddington

• 2003-09-10 14:55 Re: avr-gcc 3.3-tinyos

Eckhard Jokisch

• 2003-09-06 12:15 Optimization and unused variables

Eitan

• 2003-09-26 11:28 need help

Elena Zannoni

• 2003-09-24 19:31 Re: Handling aliases in debug information

Enache Adrian

• 2003-09-07 19:17 Re: Shell portability question
• 2003-09-20 07:41 bug in current gcc-3.4 20030916
• 2003-09-20 08:09 trouble building gcc when the sources are on a readonly partition
• 2003-09-23 09:36 Re: bug in current gcc-3.4 20030916

Eric Botcazou

• 2003-09-06 13:51 Re: Shifts by constants > 31 may generate illegal sparc assembler output
• 2003-09-07 14:42 Bugzilla question
• 2003-09-09 20:47 Reload problem
• 2003-09-11 09:07 Re: Reload problem
• 2003-09-12 08:59 Re: Reload problem
• 2003-09-13 04:40 Potential GC problem on the 3.3 branch
• 2003-09-14 07:07 Re: Potential GC problem on the 3.3 branch
• 2003-09-16 06:50 PR optimization/9786
• 2003-09-16 14:49 Re: Reload problem
• 2003-09-16 21:00 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-17 06:34 Re: PR optimization/9786
• 2003-09-21 07:51 Re: Gcc 3.3 regressions
• 2003-09-22 07:16 Re: PR optimization/9786
• 2003-09-22 20:45 loop optimizer naivety
• 2003-09-23 06:40 Re: loop optimizer naivety
• 2003-09-23 08:29 Re: loop optimizer naivety
• 2003-09-23 08:37 Re: loop optimizer naivety
• 2003-09-23 09:15 Re: loop optimizer naivety
• 2003-09-23 10:27 Re: loop optimizer naivety
• 2003-09-23 10:51 Re: loop optimizer naivety
• 2003-09-24 07:54 Re: [3.3.2] regressions on the branch (pack-test-2.c, parameter-declaration-1.C)

Eric Christopher

• 2003-09-04 20:10 Re: Automatic architecture optimization
• 2003-09-04 21:37 Re: Automatic architecture optimization
• 2003-09-04 21:46 Re: Automatic architecture optimization
• 2003-09-04 22:24 Re: Automatic architecture optimization
• 2003-09-05 18:43 Re: [tree-ssa] Error '_muldi3' on mips-sgi-IRIX6.5
• 2003-09-05 20:00 Re: [tree-ssa] Error '_muldi3' on mips-sgi-IRIX6.5
• 2003-09-05 22:07 Re: Help with gcc
• 2003-09-06 20:45 Re: [tree-ssa] Error '_muldi3' on mips-sgi-IRIX6.5
• 2003-09-09 09:21 Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64
• 2003-09-16 01:56 Re: gcc with out glibc and glibc++
• 2003-09-16 03:03 Re: gcc with out glibc and glibc++
• 2003-09-17 22:03 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux
• 2003-09-17 22:12 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux
• 2003-09-30 17:17 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4
• 2003-09-30 22:06 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4

Everton da Silva Marques

• 2003-09-09 20:35 gcc.gnu.org website blocking browser by user-agent?

Eyal Lebedinsky

• 2003-09-02 23:43 [tree-ssa] almost bootstraps...
• 2003-09-03 09:29 Re: [tree-ssa] almost bootstraps...
• 2003-09-05 10:09 Re: ancient bounds checking gcc patch updated for gcc-3.3.1
• 2003-09-21 13:30 Anyone dealing with bug 12113?

fishbaoz

• 2003-09-08 01:08 Question about "match_dup"

Florian Weimer

• 2003-09-18 13:58 [3.4] Incomplete types and template definitions
• 2003-09-18 14:40 Re: [3.4] Incomplete types and template definitions
• 2003-09-21 17:20 Re: [3.4] Incomplete types and template definitions
• 2003-09-29 19:45 Re: Trying to build on DYNIX/ptx: 'strbuf' in cppcharset.c

Francisco M. Marzoa Alonso

• 2003-09-10 10:06 Looking for a GCC hacker
• 2003-09-19 10:47 Does GASP continue existing?
• 2003-09-19 20:54 Re: Does GASP continue existing?
• 2003-09-19 21:12 Re: Does GASP continue existing?

Frank Heckenbach

• 2003-09-28 20:19 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nestedfunctions
• 2003-09-28 21:49 Re: Nonlocal gotos on s390
• 2003-09-29 13:37 Re: Nonlocal gotos on s390

Gabriel Dos Reis

• 2003-09-01 13:56 Re: G++ 3.3.1 Specialization bug?
• 2003-09-02 22:11 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in pretty-printer
• 2003-09-02 22:23 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in pretty-printer
• 2003-09-03 00:56 Re: __func__ and C++
• 2003-09-03 19:49 Re: __func__ and C++
• 2003-09-05 07:02 Re: libjava doesn't build with new cp/*
• 2003-09-05 20:17 Re: Patch to decl2.c
• 2003-09-07 16:06 Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64
• 2003-09-07 17:23 Re: Redeclaration of used symbols
• 2003-09-07 17:31 Re: Redeclaration of used symbols
• 2003-09-07 17:56 Re: Redeclaration of used symbols
• 2003-09-07 18:49 Re: Redeclaration of used symbols
• 2003-09-07 19:37 Re: Redeclaration of used symbols
• 2003-09-09 00:56 Re: Patch for Bug No-8081
• 2003-09-09 08:45 Re: Patch for Bug No-8081
• 2003-09-09 10:16 Re: Patch for Bug No-8081
• 2003-09-12 03:58 Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type
• 2003-09-15 13:53 Re: On a piece of code in C++ and nested functions
• 2003-09-16 18:46 Re: Reference-to-pointer argument bug?
• 2003-09-16 19:34 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-19 02:08 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour
• 2003-09-19 08:35 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour
• 2003-09-19 22:01 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour
• 2003-09-21 15:51 Re: Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c
• 2003-09-21 17:59 Re: [3.4] Incomplete types and template definitions
• 2003-09-21 20:18 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour
• 2003-09-21 23:11 Re: Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c
• 2003-09-23 09:25 Re: DECL_RESULT not available for declared (but not defined) function?
• 2003-09-23 19:44 Re: Arrays and Alignment
• 2003-09-23 19:56 Re: Arrays and Alignment
• 2003-09-23 21:54 Re: Arrays and Alignment
• 2003-09-23 22:10 Re: Arrays and Alignment
• 2003-09-24 10:21 Re: Abusive (?) promotions to int
• 2003-09-25 04:04 Parallel build broken on i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2003-09-26 07:51 Re: Really, really const
• 2003-09-26 08:22 Re: Really, really const
• 2003-09-26 08:29 Re: Really, really const
• 2003-09-26 08:30 Re: Really, really const
• 2003-09-26 08:50 Re: Really, really const
• 2003-09-26 09:12 Re: Really, really const
• 2003-09-27 00:22 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla
• 2003-09-27 01:20 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla
• 2003-09-29 15:01 Re: __alignof__(T) not compile time constant?
• 2003-09-30 07:23 Re: C++ language lawyer question
• 2003-09-30 07:29 Re: C++ language lawyer question

Gabriel Paubert

• 2003-09-01 18:47 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers
• 2003-09-02 00:57 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers
• 2003-09-29 10:48 Re: inline asm constraints for conditions
• 2003-09-29 11:18 Re: Efficient overflow checking (was: plans for nested functions)
• 2003-09-29 19:45 Re: inline asm constraints for conditions

Gareth Pearce

• 2003-09-15 11:50 Re: Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD 20030915 on i786-cygwin: ICE in libgcc2.c: In function `__popcountsi2': libgcc.c:751 internal compiler error...

Gaute B Strokkenes

• 2003-09-29 17:32 Re: Trying to build on DYNIX/ptx: 'strbuf' in cppcharset.c

gccadmin

• 2003-09-01 17:06 gcc-ss-3.3-20030901 is now available
• 2003-09-03 17:02 gcc-ss-3.4-20030903 is now available
• 2003-09-08 17:10 gcc-ss-3.3-20030908 is now available
• 2003-09-10 16:57 gcc-ss-3.4-20030910 is now available
• 2003-09-15 17:12 gcc-ss-3.3-20030915 is now available
• 2003-09-17 17:02 gcc-ss-3.4-20030917 is now available
• 2003-09-22 17:03 gcc-ss-3.3-20030922 is now available
• 2003-09-24 18:11 gcc-ss-3.4-20030924 is now available
• 2003-09-29 17:02 gcc-ss-3.3-20030929 is now available

Geoff Keating

• 2003-09-02 18:12 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 rewrite
• 2003-09-05 22:22 Re: PR 11313
• 2003-09-08 19:33 Re: PCH assumes there is no information before the object
• 2003-09-08 20:04 Re: PCH assumes there is no information before the object
• 2003-09-09 01:16 Re: PCH assumes there is no information before the object
• 2003-09-12 19:28 Re: Reload problem
• 2003-09-13 22:37 Re: Potential GC problem on the 3.3 branch
• 2003-09-15 01:42 Re: gcc 3.4, error: conflicting types for local extern variabled
• 2003-09-17 19:56 Re: Copying collection and our ggc_collect practices
• 2003-09-23 20:44 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-27 18:57 Re: Disabling fixproto: powerpc-eabi[sim]altivec
• 2003-09-29 22:03 Re: Who should set main_input_filename to "<stdin>"?

Geoffrey Keating

• 2003-09-05 20:04 Re: Patch to decl2.c

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2003-09-01 09:01 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include
• 2003-09-10 13:32 [tree-ssa] crash in coalesce_abnormal_edges, merge from mainline?
• 2003-09-10 14:19 Re: [gnu.org #99802] GCC Website Problems
• 2003-09-11 16:30 Re: Vtable incompatibility between GCC 3.0/3.2?
• 2003-09-12 13:17 Re: memory allocation
• 2003-09-17 07:55 sparc-sun-solaris2.9: No rule to make target `all'
• 2003-09-17 08:11 bootstrap failure: i386-unknown-freebsd4.8
• 2003-09-17 14:02 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-18 10:14 system.h causes bootstrap failure
• 2003-09-18 13:32 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.9: No rule to make target `all'
• 2003-09-19 19:17 Ziemowit Laski becomes Objective-C co-maintainer
• 2003-09-21 15:39 Re: Lots of suggestions for the gcc manual
• 2003-09-22 09:41 PATCH for RE: what with the logo
• 2003-09-22 13:24 RE: what with the logo
• 2003-09-22 13:27 A minor adjustment to the development plan
• 2003-09-22 15:18 Re: A minor adjustment to the development plan
• 2003-09-29 17:32 Several tree-ssa issues
• 2003-09-29 19:38 Re: Patch for the bounds checking section of http://gcc.gnu.org/extensions.html
• 2003-09-29 22:41 C++ language lawyer question
• 2003-09-29 23:21 Re: C++ language lawyer question

Gerhard Tonn

• 2003-09-29 11:44 Re: Nonlocal gotos on s390

Ginger Wolnik

• 2003-09-08 02:17 Re: [gnu.org #99802] GCC Website Problems

Glen Nakamura

• 2003-09-23 07:56 Re: loop optimizer naivety
• 2003-09-23 10:03 Re: loop optimizer naivety
• 2003-09-23 10:47 Re: loop optimizer naivety

Greg Schafer

• 2003-09-17 22:55 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux
• 2003-09-17 23:06 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux
• 2003-09-17 23:17 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux

Gunther Nikl

• 2003-09-01 12:00 Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables
• 2003-09-04 09:31 [3.3/3.4] configure hickup with --build and --host?
• 2003-09-15 09:02 Re: m68k target deprecations
• 2003-09-15 14:44 Re: m68k call_value insn
• 2003-09-16 07:04 Re: m68k call_value insn

Gunther Piez

• 2003-09-06 11:40 inlining failed
• 2003-09-06 15:34 Re: inlining failed
• 2003-09-06 17:34 Re: inlining failed
• 2003-09-06 19:47 Re: inlining failed

guw

• 2003-09-03 06:05 why gcj is slower than jvm
• 2003-09-03 06:54 Re: Re: why gcj is slower than jvm
• 2003-09-04 02:03 Re: why gcj is slower than jvm

Gyan Ranjan Singh, Noida

• 2003-09-30 10:41 unsubscribe......

H. J. Lu

• 2003-09-03 20:50 Re: Exceptions won't work in my dll!
• 2003-09-06 23:01 Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64
• 2003-09-07 04:20 Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64
• 2003-09-07 15:30 Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64
• 2003-09-08 22:20 Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64
• 2003-09-08 22:21 Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64
• 2003-09-09 05:21 Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64
• 2003-09-09 16:43 Does TLS work for hpux/ia64?
• 2003-09-09 17:39 Re: Does TLS work for hpux/ia64?
• 2003-09-09 18:17 Re: Does TLS work for hpux/ia64?
• 2003-09-09 20:57 Re: Does TLS work for hpux/ia64?
• 2003-09-10 02:28 Re: Does TLS work for hpux/ia64?
• 2003-09-12 17:25 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure
• 2003-09-12 20:17 Re: gcc_tooldir
• 2003-09-12 20:32 Re: gcc_tooldir
• 2003-09-13 18:00 Mailine failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64 again
• 2003-09-14 05:33 Re: Mailine failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64 again
• 2003-09-17 06:17 Gcc 3.3 regressions
• 2003-09-17 21:58 Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux
• 2003-09-17 22:28 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux
• 2003-09-17 23:34 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux
• 2003-09-30 17:42 PATCH: Support ILP32 in ld ia64 tests

Hans-Peter Nilsson

• 2003-09-24 22:10 Re: What else can I disable fixproto for?
• 2003-09-27 05:53 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla
• 2003-09-27 16:59 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla
• 2003-09-27 17:02 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla
• 2003-09-27 20:13 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla
• 2003-09-27 20:35 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla
• 2003-09-28 14:46 Re: Porting GCC troubles : about register window
• 2003-09-30 06:56 Re: Porting GCC troubles : about register window

He HongFu

• 2003-09-24 06:57 static inline
• 2003-09-29 00:42 compile successfully but cannot run.

Ian Lance Taylor

• 2003-09-03 04:41 Re: [toplevel] Gas install name problem from autoconf 2.5x
• 2003-09-03 16:12 Re: [toplevel] Gas install name problem from autoconf 2.5x
• 2003-09-03 16:13 Re: [toplevel] Gas install name problem from autoconf 2.5x
• 2003-09-07 04:08 Re: [toplevel] Gas install name problem from autoconf 2.5x
• 2003-09-08 03:54 Re: Question about "match_dup"
• 2003-09-08 04:07 Re: Question about "match_dup"
• 2003-09-09 06:31 Question about setting of fuller_mask in force_to_mode()
• 2003-09-09 20:43 Re: gcc.gnu.org website blocking browser by user-agent?
• 2003-09-12 22:21 Re: gcc_tooldir
• 2003-09-15 16:51 Re: yacc/bison build errors on current CVS
• 2003-09-15 22:33 Re: yacc/bison build errors on current CVS
• 2003-09-16 04:21 [Bug gcc/12279] Re: GCC 3.4-20030913 VAX lossage.
• 2003-09-16 04:43 Re: [Bug gcc/12279] Re: GCC 3.4-20030913 VAX lossage.
• 2003-09-16 21:13 Re: [Bug gcc/12279] Re: GCC 3.4-20030913 VAX lossage.
• 2003-09-22 23:16 Re: Linkonce vs comdat
• 2003-09-23 17:29 Re: Linkonce vs comdat
• 2003-09-24 23:00 Re: Abusive (?) promotions to int
• 2003-09-29 01:14 Re: Worm and virus free code.

info

• 2003-09-09 18:03 Important - a link within your site needs changing

Jakub Jelinek

• 2003-09-05 13:52 Re: [3.3.1]: thread local storage - what do I need?
• 2003-09-07 19:27 Re: Redeclaration of used symbols
• 2003-09-11 18:23 Re: /lib/libstdc++.so.5: no version information available
• 2003-09-29 16:52 Re: gcc3.2 slow link time

James Lemke

• 2003-09-23 14:35 Re: Linkonce vs comdat

Jamie Lokier

• 2003-09-07 15:22 Re: strange compiling problem
• 2003-09-07 15:44 Re: strange compiling problem
• 2003-09-21 04:11 Re: what with the logo
• 2003-09-29 17:21 Re: inline asm constraints for conditions
• 2003-09-29 21:02 Re: inline asm constraints for conditions

Jan Hubicka

• 2003-09-03 07:13 Re: [unit-at-a-time] Java inlining woes
• 2003-09-03 22:04 Re: [unit-at-a-time] Java inlining woes
• 2003-09-04 09:16 [RFC/RFA?] Enabling unit-at-a-time for -O2 and increasing inline limits
• 2003-09-06 07:18 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-09-05)
• 2003-09-06 18:44 Re: inlining failed
• 2003-09-06 19:11 -fkeep-inline-fucntions and unit-at-a-time
• 2003-09-06 21:37 Re: inlining failed
• 2003-09-06 23:13 Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64
• 2003-09-07 00:00 Re: inlining failed
• 2003-09-07 12:46 Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64
• 2003-09-07 13:52 Redeclaration of used symbols
• 2003-09-07 13:58 Re: glibc broken with 3.4...
• 2003-09-07 15:54 Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64
• 2003-09-07 17:25 Re: Redeclaration of used symbols
• 2003-09-07 17:44 Re: Redeclaration of used symbols
• 2003-09-07 18:14 Re: Redeclaration of used symbols
• 2003-09-07 20:19 Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64
• 2003-09-07 20:21 Re: Redeclaration of used symbols
• 2003-09-07 20:22 Re: Redeclaration of used symbols
• 2003-09-07 20:38 Re: glibc broken with 3.4...
• 2003-09-07 21:02 Re: passing regparm floating-point args in FPU registers
• 2003-09-07 21:59 Re: glibc broken with 3.4...
• 2003-09-08 23:41 Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64
• 2003-09-09 00:05 Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64
• 2003-09-09 13:26 Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64
• 2003-09-09 13:31 Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64
• 2003-09-09 14:59 20011119-1.c failure (Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64)
• 2003-09-14 22:24 Re: Patches to C++ front end have caused numerous regressions
• 2003-09-23 13:15 Re: Patches to C++ front end have caused numerous regressions
• 2003-09-27 13:09 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions
• 2003-09-27 20:27 Re: C++ testsuite failures on AIX

Janis Johnson

• 2003-09-23 16:10 Re: Gcc To-Do list

Janne Karhunen

• 2003-09-27 10:24 HUGE compilation time / memory requirement in compilation of single file
• 2003-09-28 08:04 Re: [spam] Re: HUGE compilation time / memory requirement in compilation of single file
• 2003-09-29 15:39 Re: HUGE compilation time / memory requirement in compilation of single file
• 2003-09-30 09:18 Re: HUGE compilation time / memory requirement in compilation of single file

Jason Merrill

• 2003-09-11 17:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Make check bombs my system onnoncompile/20010425-1.c
• 2003-09-12 20:24 Re: [tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end
• 2003-09-19 18:28 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour
• 2003-09-19 19:45 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour
• 2003-09-19 20:07 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour
• 2003-09-20 05:34 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour
• 2003-09-23 19:29 Re: [tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end

Jeff Sturm

• 2003-09-02 13:29 Re: how can I contribute to GCC from a windows box
• 2003-09-03 06:29 Re: [unit-at-a-time] Java inlining woes
• 2003-09-03 06:35 Re: why gcj is slower than jvm
• 2003-09-03 21:54 Re: [unit-at-a-time] Java inlining woes
• 2003-09-04 03:08 Re: why gcj is slower than jvm
• 2003-09-16 03:17 Re: gcc with out glibc and glibc++
• 2003-09-16 14:17 Re: [tree-ssa] Java: Decls that alias?
• 2003-09-16 16:24 RE: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-16 19:23 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-19 18:06 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-19 21:31 Re: [tree-ssa] Java: Decls that alias?
• 2003-09-27 13:37 Re: HUGE compilation time / memory requirement in compilation ofsingle file
• 2003-09-27 16:42 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla

Jerry Quinn

• 2003-09-15 02:34 c++ >> and signed numbers?

Jialin Dou

• 2003-09-14 22:10 Learning gcc

Jim Wilson

• 2003-09-02 21:09 Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings
• 2003-09-03 02:59 Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings
• 2003-09-06 23:30 Re: MS obj not recogn. I need answer
• 2003-09-06 23:39 Re: building cross gcc-3.3 on i686 for target i586
• 2003-09-06 23:44 Re: Question about inline asm
• 2003-09-07 01:10 Re: strange compiling problem
• 2003-09-07 01:24 Re: More help to my port.
• 2003-09-07 01:39 Re: Optimization and unused variables
• 2003-09-07 01:58 Re: Redundant check for prologue_epilogue_contains in init_alias_analysis?
• 2003-09-07 03:49 Re: PR 11319
• 2003-09-07 04:05 Re: Global register variables (bugs #7871, #10684, and #11413)
• 2003-09-07 19:23 Re: casesi pattern failure
• 2003-09-07 19:37 Re: Redundant check for prologue_epilogue_contains ininit_alias_analysis?
• 2003-09-08 01:07 Re: PR 11319
• 2003-09-08 17:36 Re: More help to my port.
• 2003-09-09 00:13 Re: passing regparm floating-point args in FPU registers
• 2003-09-09 00:20 Re: Another reload problem/bug on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-09-09 06:35 Re: Shifts by constants > 31 may generate illegal sparc assembleroutput
• 2003-09-09 18:06 Re: Question about setting of fuller_mask in force_to_mode()
• 2003-09-10 21:53 Re: GCC DFA Scheduling Query
• 2003-09-10 22:13 Re: not working
• 2003-09-10 22:59 Re: Reload problem
• 2003-09-11 19:22 Re: Reload problem
• 2003-09-11 19:52 Re: 3.4 installation problems: libc is somewhere unusual
• 2003-09-12 07:05 Re: GCC DFA Scheduling Query
• 2003-09-13 02:24 Re: 3.4 installation problems: libc is somewhere unusual
• 2003-09-16 02:45 Re: The address of a symbol_ref
• 2003-09-16 02:48 Re: needed: copyright assignment form
• 2003-09-16 02:58 Re: Expression and Meta Templates Problem using C++ (Wrong results)
• 2003-09-16 02:59 Re: I wanna have GCC mailing list.
• 2003-09-16 03:10 Re: c++ >> and signed numbers?
• 2003-09-17 07:31 Re: Scheduling for one processor variant, but reporting times forothers
• 2003-09-17 07:38 Re: Controlling what kind of value ends in a register
• 2003-09-17 18:13 Re: Dynamic FUNCTION_OUTGOING_VALUE?
• 2003-09-17 18:22 Re: Questions on schedule-insns and IA32
• 2003-09-17 18:33 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-18 18:12 Re: Dynamic FUNCTION_OUTGOING_VALUE?
• 2003-09-23 00:12 Re: Need help with fixing this two year old backend bug in mainline.
• 2003-09-23 01:36 Re: motorola altivec extension question
• 2003-09-23 03:10 Re: mips/xm-iris5.h
• 2003-09-23 04:48 Re: CASE_VECTOR_SHORTEN_MODE
• 2003-09-23 05:01 Re: Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC
• 2003-09-23 05:08 Re: TO: Jim Wilson, Deepak B. Nayak, Ritu, ...
• 2003-09-23 05:17 Re: RFC: debug line info & inlining; patch proposal and request forcomments.
• 2003-09-23 05:33 Re: bug in current gcc-3.4 20030916
• 2003-09-23 05:59 Re: Promotion of integer return types to int
• 2003-09-23 06:20 Re: mips/xm-iris5.h
• 2003-09-23 06:46 Re: arrays and typedefs
• 2003-09-23 22:26 Re: GCC and memory segments
• 2003-09-25 04:38 Re: Dynamic FUNCTION_OUTGOING_VALUE?
• 2003-09-25 04:51 Re: RTL
• 2003-09-25 05:02 Re: Abusive (?) promotions to int
• 2003-09-25 05:13 Re: gcc comes out with Aborted
• 2003-09-25 05:24 Re: static inline
• 2003-09-26 06:31 Re: GCC and memory segments
• 2003-09-26 06:50 Re: Optimising redundant compares
• 2003-09-26 06:56 Re: Optimising redundant compares
• 2003-09-26 19:52 Re: GCC and memory segments

Joe Buck

• 2003-09-02 19:00 [tree-ssa] crash in pretty-printer
• 2003-09-02 21:27 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in pretty-printer
• 2003-09-02 22:57 Re: [using gcc book] final credits
• 2003-09-03 00:47 Re: __func__ and C++
• 2003-09-03 20:51 Re: Embedded-C Support nospam
• 2003-09-04 00:30 HP's compiler crashes when building gcc from trunk
• 2003-09-04 00:41 Re: HP's compiler crashes when building gcc from trunk
• 2003-09-04 00:49 please do not add "nospam" to your gcc list email titles
• 2003-09-04 17:08 Re: Getting a copy of SPEC CPU2000 for gcc-3.4 performance regression testing...
• 2003-09-05 16:21 Re: Vtable incompatibility between GCC 3.0/3.2?
• 2003-09-05 22:23 Re: HP's compiler crashes when building gcc from trunk
• 2003-09-12 19:25 Re: m68k target deprecations
• 2003-09-16 15:59 Re: c++ >> and signed numbers?
• 2003-09-16 16:02 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-16 20:12 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-16 20:18 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-17 22:08 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux
• 2003-09-19 16:48 Re: what with the logo
• 2003-09-23 18:06 Re: help for doubts
• 2003-09-26 18:51 Re: question about symbols in object file and -ffast-math with optimization turned on

Joel Sherrill

• 2003-09-12 20:21 Re: m68k target deprecations
• 2003-09-19 13:14 Re: what with the logo
• 2003-09-30 12:45 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4

Joerg . Richter

• 2003-09-02 11:42 Exceptions, Optimizations and AIX
• 2003-09-02 13:33 Re: Exceptions, Optimizations and AIX
• 2003-09-02 15:10 RE: Exceptions, Optimizations and AIX
• 2003-09-10 09:18 Missing inline -> uncaught exception (AIX & shared libs)

Joern Rennecke

• 2003-09-12 12:28 Re: Reload problem
• 2003-09-16 17:45 Re: Controlling what kind of value ends in a register
• 2003-09-16 18:46 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-18 12:50 Re: Questions on schedule-insns and IA32

John David Anglin

• 2003-09-17 03:28 Re: PR optimization/9786
• 2003-09-22 03:04 Re: [hppa-linux] HEAD broken?
• 2003-09-22 04:30 Re: patch rereview requested for PRs 6860, 10467 and 11741
• 2003-09-26 16:43 Re: hppa64-linux vs. hppa-linux: Why this difference?
• 2003-09-30 20:04 Sibcall arguments passed on the stack

John Levon

• 2003-09-16 14:38 Re: Local variable memory allocation

John Lu

• 2003-09-03 17:09 Embedded-C Support
• 2003-09-03 18:16 Embedded-C Support nospam

Johnson, Tony -Research

• 2003-09-03 16:55 gcc problem with new kde build
• 2003-09-03 17:02 gcc problem with new kde build nospam

Jon Beniston

• 2003-09-25 09:49 Optimising redundant compares
• 2003-09-25 17:58 RE: Optimising redundant compares
• 2003-09-25 18:12 RE: Optimising redundant compares
• 2003-09-26 10:41 RE: Optimising redundant compares
• 2003-09-26 11:34 RE: need help

Jonathan Wakely

• 2003-09-01 12:16 Re: G++ 3.3.1 Specialization bug?
• 2003-09-01 16:09 Re: G++ 3.3.1 Specialization bug?

Jonathan Wilson

• 2003-09-01 01:58 Does GCC support TLS or SEH?
• 2003-09-02 10:29 how can I contribute to GCC from a windows box
• 2003-09-04 22:37 what do I need to do to become a GCC contributor?
• 2003-09-05 12:17 Re: what do I need to do to become a GCC contributor?
• 2003-09-15 13:41 list of GCC hosts and targets?

Joseph S. Myers

• 2003-09-15 13:59 Re: yacc/bison build errors on current CVS
• 2003-09-26 21:57 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla
• 2003-09-30 20:35 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4

jsalz-gcc

• 2003-09-16 18:38 Reference-to-pointer argument bug?

Kai Henningsen

• 2003-09-07 10:38 Re: -Wold-style-cast
• 2003-09-08 10:08 Re: Redeclaration of used symbols
• 2003-09-14 17:45 Re: Lots of suggestions for the gcc manual

Karel Gardas

• 2003-09-04 20:07 More on MICO app testing [was: Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)]
• 2003-09-16 16:47 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-16 19:42 Re: A user's experiences with GCC-3.4 snapshots
• 2003-09-26 11:52 Re: Bizarre symbol names generated by g++

Kaveh R. Ghazi

• 2003-09-07 16:35 Re: Gcc mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64
• 2003-09-10 17:21 Re: query on build and test times
• 2003-09-16 18:31 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-16 18:40 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-17 13:58 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-19 13:43 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-19 14:03 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-19 14:30 array11.C failing on all LP64 targets
• 2003-09-22 15:48 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?

Kazu Hirata

• 2003-09-03 01:09 "REG_FREQ (i) = 0;" needed for 3.3 branch?
• 2003-09-04 12:27 Duplicate constraint characters in mn10300.h
• 2003-09-04 14:51 Re: Duplicate constraint characters in mn10300.h

Kelley Cook

• 2003-09-08 14:09 Re: cygwin build problems...(libintl)
• 2003-09-09 13:41 Fwd: Re: Question about substituting $(MAKE) and recursive makes.

Kevin B. Hendricks

• 2003-09-04 15:42 possible small bug in g77 when writing direct access files

Kiran Kumar

• 2003-09-15 04:55 Re: Learning gcc

Kirill Smelkov

• 2003-09-01 07:40 Re: G++ 3.3.1 Specialization bug?
• 2003-09-01 18:48 Re: G++ 3.3.1 Specialization bug?

Kishen Bahudhanam

• 2003-09-26 12:16 printing 64-bit numbers in HEX

Kyle Centers

• 2003-09-04 06:44 strange compiling problem

Lally Singh

• 2003-09-26 00:21 Arbitrary function as template parameter?
• 2003-09-26 02:09 [Solved] Re: Arbitrary function as template parameter?

Laurent GUERBY

• 2003-09-17 18:46 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc

law

• 2003-09-02 03:37 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux
• 2003-09-02 03:53 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux
• 2003-09-02 15:00 [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux
• 2003-09-04 20:32 Re: [tree-ssa] g95 SEGV building libgfortran
• 2003-09-04 20:54 Re: [tree-ssa] g95 SEGV building libgfortran
• 2003-09-04 21:14 Re: [tree-ssa] g95 SEGV building libgfortran
• 2003-09-04 21:38 Re: [tree-ssa] g95 SEGV building libgfortran
• 2003-09-10 07:53 Re: GCC Induction Variable Terminology
• 2003-09-10 14:36 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in coalesce_abnormal_edges, merge from mainline?
• 2003-09-10 17:03 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in coalesce_abnormal_edges, merge from mainline?
• 2003-09-10 20:55 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in coalesce_abnormal_edges, merge from mainline?
• 2003-09-11 18:59 Re: /lib/libstdc++.so.5: no version information available
• 2003-09-12 19:37 Re: [tree-ssa] crash in coalesce_abnormal_edges, merge from mainline?
• 2003-09-12 19:49 Re: [tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end
• 2003-09-12 21:24 Re: [tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end
• 2003-09-16 20:44 Re: [tree-ssa] Memory usage in compute_immediate_uses
• 2003-09-16 23:08 Re: [tree-ssa] Memory usage in compute_immediate_uses
• 2003-09-16 23:33 Re: [tree-ssa] Memory usage in compute_immediate_uses
• 2003-09-18 14:17 Re: [tree-ssa] Branch broken
• 2003-09-19 05:22 libstdc++-v3 testsuite bug -- uninitialized variable
• 2003-09-22 14:53 Re: integral location_t
• 2003-09-22 15:20 Re: integral location_t
• 2003-09-22 21:18 Re: loop optimizer naivety
• 2003-09-23 07:53 Re: loop optimizer naivety
• 2003-09-24 04:02 Re: loop optimizer naivety

Linus Torvalds

• 2003-09-26 23:30 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions

Loren James Rittle

• 2003-09-05 02:34 all daily bootstraps on *.freebsd.org using GNU make
• 2003-09-11 00:17 Re: gcc 3.3 and FreeBSD 4.8
• 2003-09-18 17:44 Re: system.h causes bootstrap failure
• 2003-09-30 14:29 Re: Several tree-ssa issues

Loukas D. Peristeras

• 2003-09-27 17:15 request

Luigi Bedin

• 2003-09-04 13:57 g77-3.2.2
• 2003-09-04 14:01 nospam g77-3.2.2
• 2003-09-04 14:10 g77-3.2.2

Luke Stebbing

• 2003-09-22 03:31 RE: what with the logo

Manik, Raina (IE10)

• 2003-09-03 04:25 alloca() called when i do not want it to be called

Manoj Srivastava

• 2003-09-15 18:54 Re: yacc/bison build errors on current CVS

Marcus Binny

• 2003-09-08 08:12 cygwin build problems...(libintl)

Marcus Comstedt

• 2003-09-12 19:55 gcc_tooldir
• 2003-09-12 20:22 Re: gcc_tooldir
• 2003-09-12 21:23 Re: gcc_tooldir
• 2003-09-12 22:02 Re: gcc_tooldir
• 2003-09-13 21:24 Re: gcc_tooldir
• 2003-09-24 18:10 Port contribution (legal prerequisites)

Mark Mitchell

• 2003-09-05 05:52 PR 7544
• 2003-09-05 06:20 PR 7993
• 2003-09-05 06:26 PR 8498
• 2003-09-05 06:53 Your patch for PR 9862
• 2003-09-05 07:04 New failures in G++ testsuite
• 2003-09-05 07:09 PR 11313
• 2003-09-05 07:10 PR 11319
• 2003-09-05 16:36 Patch to decl2.c
• 2003-09-05 17:54 Re: Patch to decl2.c
• 2003-09-05 18:11 Re: Patch to decl2.c
• 2003-09-05 20:49 Re: Patch to decl2.c
• 2003-09-05 22:22 Problem in V3 testsuite
• 2003-09-05 22:27 Re: PR 11313
• 2003-09-06 00:05 GCC Release Status (2003-09-05)
• 2003-09-07 19:04 Re: [Bug c++/11867] [3.3/3.4 Regression] static_cast ignoresambiguity
• 2003-09-07 19:21 Re: PR 11319
• 2003-09-08 16:54 PR 11595
• 2003-09-11 05:50 Re: C++ maintainers: Please review possible fix for bootstrap[12168]
• 2003-09-12 20:27 Patches to C++ front end have caused numerous regressions
• 2003-09-12 21:09 Re: Patches to C++ front end have caused numerous regressions
• 2003-09-12 22:01 Re: Patches to C++ front end have caused numerous regressions
• 2003-09-12 22:31 RE: Patches to C++ front end have caused numerous regressions
• 2003-09-12 22:40 Re: Patches to C++ front end have caused numerous regressions
• 2003-09-13 01:27 Re: Patches to C++ front end have caused numerous regressions
• 2003-09-15 15:40 Re: On a piece of code in C++ and nested functions
• 2003-09-18 03:14 PR 12236
• 2003-09-18 18:46 Re: PR 12236
• 2003-09-19 07:25 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour
• 2003-09-19 08:47 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour
• 2003-09-19 18:49 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour
• 2003-09-19 19:58 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour
• 2003-09-19 22:08 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour
• 2003-09-21 19:33 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour
• 2003-09-23 15:28 Re: Patches to C++ front end have caused numerous regressions

Mark Wielaard

• 2003-09-04 18:28 Re: why gcj is slower than jvm

markw

• 2003-09-26 16:16 Worm and virus free code.

Marshall, Simon

• 2003-09-05 13:41 [3.3.1]: thread local storage - what do I need?

Martin Brain

• 2003-09-04 12:31 Re: GCC lexer
• 2003-09-04 12:39 An example of a mail administartor blocking gcc@gcc.gnu.org [Fwd:Mail refused: SPAM]
• 2003-09-05 12:07 Re: what do I need to do to become a GCC contributor?
• 2003-09-08 14:37 SIMD support (was Re: [tree-ssa] Minor update for project web page- vectorization)
• 2003-09-17 17:57 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-17 18:11 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-17 19:31 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc

Martin Husemann

• 2003-09-05 11:09 Re: Shifts by constants > 31 may generate illegal sparc assembler output
• 2003-09-06 14:25 Re: Shifts by constants > 31 may generate illegal sparc assembler output

Matt Austern

• 2003-09-02 18:24 __func__ and C++
• 2003-09-03 20:05 Re: __func__ and C++
• 2003-09-05 05:02 Re: ABI Issues: C++ PATCH: PR 12053
• 2003-09-22 22:02 Linkonce vs comdat
• 2003-09-23 17:24 Re: Linkonce vs comdat

Matt Fago

• 2003-09-04 18:32 Automatic architecture optimization
• 2003-09-04 20:23 Re: Automatic architecture optimization
• 2003-09-04 21:22 Re: Automatic architecture optimization
• 2003-09-04 21:47 Re: Automatic architecture optimization
• 2003-09-04 23:18 Re: Automatic architecture optimization
• 2003-09-05 01:10 Re: Automatic architecture optimization

Matt Thomas

• 2003-09-16 03:53 GCC 3.4-20030913 VAX lossage.
• 2003-09-16 04:32 Re: [Bug gcc/12279] Re: GCC 3.4-20030913 VAX lossage.
• 2003-09-16 04:54 Re: [Bug gcc/12279] Re: GCC 3.4-20030913 VAX lossage.

Matthias Klose

• 2003-09-24 07:31 [3.3.2] regressions on the branch (pack-test-2.c, parameter-declaration-1.C)

Michael Elizabeth Chastain

• 2003-09-02 17:56 'make all' fails with ICE at cp/call.c: 4571
• 2003-09-03 01:49 Re: 'make all' fails with ICE at cp/call.c: 4571
• 2003-09-05 17:30 Re: Patch to decl2.c
• 2003-09-13 02:22 Status of gcc/intl and src/intl?
• 2003-09-14 17:17 Re: Status of gcc/intl and src/intl?
• 2003-09-24 19:53 Re: Handling aliases in debug information

Michael Matz

• 2003-09-04 16:10 libjava doesn't build with new cp/*
• 2003-09-11 22:16 RE: DF_DU_CHAIN | DF_UD_CHAIN flags in new-ra
• 2003-09-16 12:31 RE: DF_DU_CHAIN | DF_UD_CHAIN flags in new-ra
• 2003-09-16 14:32 Re: Local variable memory allocation
• 2003-09-16 16:04 Re: Local variable memory allocation
• 2003-09-16 19:59 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-26 12:51 Re: Really, really const
• 2003-09-26 18:42 Re: Really, really const

Michael Meissner

• 2003-09-04 21:03 Re: Automatic architecture optimization

Michael Mueller

• 2003-09-15 10:47 Re: undefined symbol: __bb_init_func

Michael N. Moran

• 2003-09-23 19:25 Arrays and Alignment
• 2003-09-23 19:40 Re: Arrays and Alignment

Michael Veksler

• 2003-09-02 15:53 Re: Exceptions, Optimizations and AIX

Mike Stump

• 2003-09-03 18:15 Re: alloca() called when i do not want it to be called
• 2003-09-16 21:05 Re: PR optimization/9786
• 2003-09-16 23:41 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-17 17:17 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-17 17:19 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-17 18:08 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-17 21:29 Re: PR optimization/9786
• 2003-09-17 23:22 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-17 23:28 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-22 23:06 Re: Linkonce vs comdat
• 2003-09-24 18:34 Re: Abusive (?) promotions to int
• 2003-09-24 18:47 Re: integral location_t
• 2003-09-29 22:54 Re: C++ language lawyer question
• 2003-09-29 23:46 Re: C++ language lawyer question

Misra, Aveek

• 2003-09-11 18:17 RE: /lib/libstdc++.so.5: no version information available
• 2003-09-11 19:04 RE: /lib/libstdc++.so.5: no version information available
• 2003-09-11 19:12 Conflict in __dynamic_cast symbol
• 2003-09-11 20:06 RE: /lib/libstdc++.so.5: no version information available

Mohammed Tajuddin

• 2003-09-02 17:25 Re: TOC overflow on linuxppc64
• 2003-09-09 01:20 how to access PC

Mohan Embar

• 2003-09-01 13:09 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include

Mr . JOHN ZUMA

• 2003-09-07 12:55 From A.D.B Bank

Mukta Punjani, Noida

• 2003-09-11 09:28 RE: DF_DU_CHAIN | DF_UD_CHAIN flags in new-ra
• 2003-09-12 04:32 RE: DF_DU_CHAIN | DF_UD_CHAIN flags in new-ra
• 2003-09-16 12:08 RE: DF_DU_CHAIN | DF_UD_CHAIN flags in new-ra
• 2003-09-17 09:26 RE: DF_DU_CHAIN | DF_UD_CHAIN flags in new-ra
• 2003-09-18 13:32 RE: DF_DU_CHAIN | DF_UD_CHAIN flags in new-ra

Myles Sussman

• 2003-09-26 18:47 question about symbols in object file and -ffast-math with optimization turned on

Nathan Sidwell

• 2003-09-03 07:43 Re: __func__ and C++
• 2003-09-04 16:17 Re: libjava doesn't build with new cp/*
• 2003-09-18 14:45 Re: [3.4] Incomplete types and template definitions
• 2003-09-22 07:56 Re: integral location_t
• 2003-09-23 08:37 Re: integral location_t
• 2003-09-25 10:25 Re: Optimising redundant compares

Nathanael Nerode

• 2003-09-01 18:08 VSTa user wanted for testing configuration patch
• 2003-09-20 04:11 mips/xm-iris5.h
• 2003-09-23 21:05 Bootstrap failure in targhooks.c
• 2003-09-24 03:58 What else can I disable fixproto for?
• 2003-09-25 04:54 Trying to build on DYNIX/ptx: 'strbuf' in cppcharset.c
• 2003-09-26 02:56 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla
• 2003-09-26 04:13 hppa64-linux vs. hppa-linux: Why this difference?
• 2003-09-27 09:38 Disabling fixproto: OS-less embedded targets?
• 2003-09-27 09:43 Disabling fixproto: powerpc-eabi[sim]altivec
• 2003-09-30 09:52 Re: Disabling fixproto: OS-less embedded targets?
• 2003-09-30 10:57 Re: Disabling fixproto: OS-less embedded targets?
• 2003-09-30 11:42 Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4
• 2003-09-30 18:36 configure.in/config.gcc thread logic: how should it work?
• 2003-09-30 21:42 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4

Naveen Sharma, Noida

• 2003-09-30 07:42 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions

Neil Booth

• 2003-09-04 06:18 Re: HP's compiler crashes when building gcc from trunk
• 2003-09-23 21:40 Re: Arrays and Alignment
• 2003-09-23 22:04 Re: Arrays and Alignment
• 2003-09-24 05:43 Re: integral location_t
• 2003-09-24 19:46 Re: integral location_t
• 2003-09-28 09:31 Re: Who should set main_input_filename to "<stdin>"?

Nikita Shulga

• 2003-09-04 14:43 Function declaration issues
• 2003-09-04 14:47 Function declaration issues nospam
• 2003-09-04 15:02 Re: Function declaration issues

Olaf Hering

• 2003-09-14 13:51 gcc 3.4, error: conflicting types for local extern variabled
• 2003-09-14 14:10 Re: gcc 3.4, error: conflicting types for local extern variabled
• 2003-09-18 04:20 gcc 3.3.2 build regression

Olaf Petzold

• 2003-09-15 09:11 Expression and Meta Templates Problem using C++ (Wrong results)
• 2003-09-17 07:16 Re: Expression and Meta Templates Problem using C++ (Wrong results)

Olivier Hainque

• 2003-09-01 13:18 Re: Problem in split_basic_block

Pankaj Dev

• 2003-09-05 11:50 Probable GCC Bug
• 2003-09-09 06:48 GCC DFA Scheduling Query
• 2003-09-10 12:02 GCC DFA Scheduling Query
• 2003-09-12 04:55 Re: GCC DFA Scheduling Query

Paolo Carlini

• 2003-09-06 11:45 Re: inlining failed
• 2003-09-06 16:46 Re: inlining failed

Paul Brook

• 2003-09-01 23:38 [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux
• 2003-09-04 20:11 Re: [tree-ssa] g95 SEGV building libgfortran
• 2003-09-04 21:57 Re: [tree-ssa] g95 SEGV building libgfortran
• 2003-09-04 22:01 Re: [tree-ssa] g95 SEGV building libgfortran
• 2003-09-05 19:21 Re: [tree-ssa] g95 SEGV building libgfortran
• 2003-09-12 17:53 Re: [tree-ssa] Your change to testsuite/ChangeLog
• 2003-09-19 19:45 [gfortran] Random number generator
• 2003-09-19 21:09 Re: Does GASP continue existing?

Paul Harman

• 2003-09-26 11:46 Bizarre symbol names generated by g++

Paul Jarc

• 2003-09-04 21:41 Re: Automatic architecture optimization
• 2003-09-11 18:46 3.4 installation problems: libc is somewhere unusual
• 2003-09-12 19:27 Re: 3.4 installation problems: libc is somewhere unusual
• 2003-09-18 15:59 Re: 3.4 installation problems: libc is somewhere unusual

Paul Koning

• 2003-09-03 19:12 Re: __func__ and C++
• 2003-09-16 16:10 RE: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-17 13:49 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-30 20:30 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4

Per Bothner

• 2003-09-11 02:22 compiler does not bootstrap
• 2003-09-17 20:12 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-17 20:36 Re: Copying collection and our ggc_collect practices
• 2003-09-18 05:12 Re: Copying collection and our ggc_collect practices
• 2003-09-22 00:08 Re: [tree-ssa] Java: Decls that alias?
• 2003-09-23 22:37 Re: integral location_t
• 2003-09-24 06:01 Re: integral location_t
• 2003-09-24 18:26 Re: integral location_t

Per Fransson

• 2003-09-26 11:32 [tree-ssa]quick SSAPRE question

Petar Penchev

• 2003-09-17 10:53 RTL templates names
• 2003-09-17 12:47 Re: [gcc] Re: RTL templates names
• 2003-09-23 08:58 GCC and memory segments

pete

• 2003-09-24 18:12 Re: ask g77

Peter Barada

• 2003-09-19 13:10 Re: what with the logo
• 2003-09-19 15:18 Re: what with the logo

Peter Meier

• 2003-09-04 16:20 Experience with performance decrease PENTIUM 4 to ARM9 ?

Phil Edwards

• 2003-09-02 15:36 Re: how can I contribute to GCC from a windows box
• 2003-09-05 15:28 Re: More help to my port. nospam
• 2003-09-07 18:24 Failure to bootstrap for 3.3 on athlon_mp-pc-linux-gnu
• 2003-09-15 06:47 Re: Learning gcc
• 2003-09-15 15:56 Re: list of GCC hosts and targets?
• 2003-09-17 18:27 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-18 19:38 Re: Weekly gcc images
• 2003-09-19 18:24 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-23 01:25 Re: Stuck lock on anoncvs server.
• 2003-09-24 18:11 Re: [PATCH] Re: Testsuite failures due to Makefile issue
• 2003-09-26 00:26 Re: Arbitrary function as template parameter?
• 2003-09-27 21:02 Re: request

pradyut bhattacharya

• 2003-09-03 00:04 implementing conio.h
• 2003-09-03 13:08 text positioning
• 2003-09-10 10:24 not working

Rainer Orth

• 2003-09-04 23:36 Re: Automatic architecture optimization
• 2003-09-16 19:48 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-16 20:14 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-17 22:07 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux
• 2003-09-17 22:09 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux
• 2003-09-17 22:32 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux
• 2003-09-17 23:09 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux
• 2003-09-17 23:22 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux
• 2003-09-19 18:14 Re: [tree-ssa] trouble with gfortran on mips-sgi-IRIX6
• 2003-09-22 12:45 Re: mips/xm-iris5.h
• 2003-09-22 13:01 Re: trouble building gcc when the sources are on a readonly partition
• 2003-09-23 21:22 Re: Bootstrap failure in targhooks.c
• 2003-09-23 22:17 Re: Bootstrap failure in targhooks.c
• 2003-09-23 22:29 Re: Bootstrap failure in targhooks.c
• 2003-09-23 22:37 Re: Bootstrap failure in targhooks.c
• 2003-09-29 12:14 Re: Who should set main_input_filename to "<stdin>"?

Rakesh Kumar - Software, Noida

• 2003-09-24 12:02 RE: Abusive (?) promotions to int

Ralf Corsepius

• 2003-09-30 02:15 Re: Disabling fixproto: OS-less embedded targets?
• 2003-09-30 10:39 Re: Disabling fixproto: OS-less embedded targets?

Ralph Loader

• 2003-09-23 01:21 Stuck lock on anoncvs server.
• 2003-09-25 01:18 Memory needed for bootstrap?
• 2003-09-25 04:29 Bootstrap broken?

Reinhard Nissl

• 2003-09-07 11:04 packing
• 2003-09-07 11:50 Re: packing

Richard Buchmann

• 2003-09-19 14:08 arrays and typedefs

Richard Earnshaw

• 2003-09-24 09:16 Re: What else can I disable fixproto for?
• 2003-09-26 10:47 Re: Optimising redundant compares

Richard Guenther

• 2003-09-19 13:19 Problems with loop unroller and gcse in 3.3?
• 2003-09-19 13:37 Re: Problems with loop unroller and gcse in 3.3?
• 2003-09-23 10:14 Re: loop optimizer naivety
• 2003-09-23 10:35 Re: loop optimizer naivety
• 2003-09-29 14:29 Re: [Bug libstdc++/11706] std::pow(T, int) implementation pessimizescode
• 2003-09-29 14:34 __alignof__(T) not compile time constant?

Richard Henderson

• 2003-09-03 17:04 Re: DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help
• 2003-09-04 18:27 Re: [RFC/RFA?] Enabling unit-at-a-time for -O2 and increasing inline limits
• 2003-09-05 15:55 Re: [tree-ssa] g95 SEGV building libgfortran
• 2003-09-05 18:04 Re: Patch to decl2.c
• 2003-09-05 18:39 Re: Patch to decl2.c
• 2003-09-07 19:07 Re: strange compiling problem
• 2003-09-07 19:15 Re: glibc broken with 3.4...
• 2003-09-07 21:32 Re: glibc broken with 3.4...
• 2003-09-09 06:21 Re: libgcc version breakage?
• 2003-09-09 06:28 Re: how to access PC
• 2003-09-09 16:40 Re: libgcc version breakage?
• 2003-09-09 16:55 Re: Does TLS work for hpux/ia64?
• 2003-09-09 17:58 Re: Does TLS work for hpux/ia64?
• 2003-09-09 18:05 objc gnu runtime class registration
• 2003-09-09 20:13 Re: Does TLS work for hpux/ia64?
• 2003-09-09 22:41 Re: Does TLS work for hpux/ia64?
• 2003-09-10 02:30 Re: Does TLS work for hpux/ia64?
• 2003-09-11 19:17 Re: C++ testsuite failures on AIX
• 2003-09-11 19:39 Re: C++ testsuite failures on AIX
• 2003-09-12 23:00 Re: Patches to C++ front end have caused numerous regressions
• 2003-09-16 20:55 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-16 21:04 Re: [Bug gcc/12279] Re: GCC 3.4-20030913 VAX lossage.
• 2003-09-16 21:08 Re: PR optimization/9786
• 2003-09-17 23:22 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux
• 2003-09-19 17:07 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-22 06:17 integral location_t
• 2003-09-22 17:07 Re: integral location_t
• 2003-09-26 18:02 Re: Really, really const
• 2003-09-26 20:39 Re: inline asm constraints for conditions
• 2003-09-26 21:36 [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions
• 2003-09-27 00:03 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions
• 2003-09-27 17:05 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions
• 2003-09-29 16:59 Re: inline asm constraints for conditions
• 2003-09-29 17:38 Re: inline asm constraints for conditions
• 2003-09-29 22:04 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions
• 2003-09-30 16:33 Re: Porting GCC troubles : about register window

Richard Kenner

• 2003-09-01 03:23 Re: Strict aliasing and converting binary patterns between integer and float
• 2003-09-17 01:13 Re: PR optimization/9786
• 2003-09-22 02:45 Re: patch rereview requested for PRs 6860, 10467 and 11741
• 2003-09-22 12:13 Re: patch rereview requested for PRs 6860, 10467 and 11741
• 2003-09-22 13:49 Re: A minor adjustment to the development plan
• 2003-09-22 16:26 Re: A minor adjustment to the development plan
• 2003-09-23 19:50 Re: Arrays and Alignment
• 2003-09-24 23:08 Re: Abusive (?) promotions to int
• 2003-09-27 03:26 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions

Richard Zidlicky

• 2003-09-08 21:37 libgcc version breakage?
• 2003-09-09 12:58 Re: libgcc version breakage?

rick

• 2003-09-19 08:48 what with the logo

Rob Thorpe

• 2003-09-05 12:05 Re: Automatic architecture optimization

Robert Bowdidge

• 2003-09-15 18:37 needed: copyright assignment form

Robert Dewar

• 2003-09-03 02:56 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 rewrite
• 2003-09-26 14:18 Re: Really, really const
• 2003-09-27 22:14 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions
• 2003-09-27 22:16 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions
• 2003-09-27 22:18 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions
• 2003-09-28 00:14 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions

Robert Millan

• 2003-09-14 13:54 yacc/bison build errors on current CVS
• 2003-09-15 11:56 Re: yacc/bison build errors on current CVS

Roger Sayle

• 2003-09-13 15:52 Re: generate_bytecode_insn - tree code not implemented: min_expr
• 2003-09-13 17:41 Re: generate_bytecode_insn - tree code not implemented: min_expr
• 2003-09-14 13:28 Re: Mailine failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64 again
• 2003-09-27 19:15 Who should set main_input_filename to "<stdin>"?

Roger.Gough

• 2003-09-03 16:38 GCC lexer
• 2003-09-03 16:42 Gcc Lexer , "nospam"

Rupert Wood

• 2003-09-19 10:39 RE: what with the logo

Russ Allbery

• 2003-09-17 17:31 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-27 20:13 Disabling fixproto: alpha-dec-osf4.0f

S. Bosscher

• 2003-09-04 12:22 RE: [tree-ssa] SSA bug or feature?
• 2003-09-05 07:33 RE: [tree-ssa] g95 SEGV building libgfortran
• 2003-09-12 10:42 RE: Mainline bootstrap failure
• 2003-09-12 13:21 RE: [tree-ssa] Your change to testsuite/ChangeLog
• 2003-09-12 22:11 RE: Patches to C++ front end have caused numerous regressions
• 2003-09-16 15:52 RE: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-16 15:54 RE: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-21 13:33 RE: Anyone dealing with bug 12113?
• 2003-09-22 10:44 RE: Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c

Segher Boessenkool

• 2003-09-12 08:49 Re: 3.4 installation problems: libc is somewhere unusual
• 2003-09-12 13:09 Re: 3.4 installation problems: libc is somewhere unusual

Setyo W

• 2003-09-30 11:13 Tips tambahan melimpahkan usaha

Simon Marlow

• 2003-09-08 08:39 RE: Global register variables (bugs #7871, #10684, and #11413)

Singh Pradyuman-R50282

• 2003-09-01 13:17 TailCall Opt

Sitikant Sahu, Noida

• 2003-09-08 05:51 Patch for Bug No-8081
• 2003-09-08 07:08 RE: Patch for Bug No-8081
• 2003-09-09 07:36 RE: Patch for Bug No-8081
• 2003-09-09 09:20 RE: Patch for Bug No-8081
• 2003-09-09 11:15 RE: Patch for Bug No-8081

Spundun Bhatt

• 2003-09-17 17:44 motorola altivec extension question
• 2003-09-22 21:31 Re: motorola altivec extension question

Sruthy C.N

• 2003-09-25 04:11 RTL
• 2003-09-30 12:10 Re: RTL
• 2003-09-30 12:10 Re: RTL

Stan Shebs

• 2003-09-08 21:14 Re: PR 8498
• 2003-09-09 21:17 Re: PR 7993
• 2003-09-16 21:58 Zem Laski for ObjC maintenance

Stephan Bergmann

• 2003-09-02 08:34 _Unwind_RaiseException incompatibility?
• 2003-09-05 08:49 Vtable incompatibility between GCC 3.0/3.2?
• 2003-09-05 13:00 Re: Vtable incompatibility between GCC 3.0/3.2?
• 2003-09-09 10:36 Re: Vtable incompatibility between GCC 3.0/3.2?

Stephan T. Lavavej

• 2003-09-02 15:15 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 rewrite
• 2003-09-04 10:53 -Wold-style-cast
• 2003-09-19 14:23 RE: what with the logo
• 2003-09-20 00:25 Re: what with the logo
• 2003-09-22 03:50 RE: what with the logo

Stephan Thomas Lavavej

• 2003-09-13 10:51 Lots of suggestions for the gcc manual

Steve Pribyl

• 2003-09-16 01:48 gcc with out glibc and glibc++
• 2003-09-16 02:51 Re: gcc with out glibc and glibc++

Steve Snyder

• 2003-09-17 13:41 Questions on schedule-insns and IA32

Steven Bosscher

• 2003-09-06 13:28 Re: Your patch for PR 9862
• 2003-09-11 09:23 [tree-ssa] Make check bombs my system on noncompile/20010425-1.c
• 2003-09-12 22:26 Re: Bootstrap broken on HEAD
• 2003-09-15 13:34 On a piece of code in C++ and nested functions
• 2003-09-17 06:59 Re: A user's experiences with GCC-3.4 snapshots
• 2003-09-17 18:41 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc
• 2003-09-20 13:22 Re: [tree-ssa] libgfortran build error in intrinsics/random.c
• 2003-09-26 08:18 Re: Really, really const
• 2003-09-27 23:45 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions
• 2003-09-28 20:42 [tree-ssa] Weird things happen to GC with checking disabled
• 2003-09-30 22:04 Re: tree-ssa-vrp

Steven G. Kargl

• 2003-09-07 23:26 Fix typo in libmudflap on tree-ssa branch

Svein E. Seldal

• 2003-09-13 13:23 Re: about to port GCC

SVR Anand

• 2003-09-24 18:26 gcc comes out with Aborted

Tal Agmon

• 2003-09-22 10:24 CASE_VECTOR_SHORTEN_MODE
• 2003-09-23 09:36 Gcc To-Do list

Test

• 2003-09-15 04:45 I wanna have GCC mailing list.

Tiago Stein D'Agostini

• 2003-09-06 17:31 dump-tree-xxx format (fwd)

TiVo Employment

• 2003-09-01 07:34 Re: [SPAM ?] Thank you!
• 2003-09-02 16:17 Re: [SPAM ?] Re: Thank you!

TKostadinov

• 2003-09-10 09:54 Info

tm_gccmail

• 2003-09-03 21:23 Re: text positioning
• 2003-09-04 21:01 Re: Function declaration issues
• 2003-09-15 18:41 Re: The address of a symbol_ref
• 2003-09-22 20:16 Re: Does GASP continue existing?
• 2003-09-29 20:31 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions

Tom Tromey

• 2003-09-04 16:56 Re: libjava doesn't build with new cp/*
• 2003-09-05 19:35 Re: libjava doesn't build with new cp/*
• 2003-09-13 16:54 Re: generate_bytecode_insn - tree code not implemented: min_expr
• 2003-09-17 15:24 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
• 2003-09-17 16:02 libffi test suite maintainer
• 2003-09-23 16:37 Re: libffi test suite maintainer
• 2003-09-25 23:57 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla
• 2003-09-27 05:52 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla

tony_

• 2003-09-10 13:27 usubscribe

Toon Moene

• 2003-09-12 19:19 Re: GCC Induction Variable Terminology
• 2003-09-26 18:25 Re: ask g77

Ulrich Weigand

• 2003-09-23 21:41 Testsuite failures due to Makefile issue
• 2003-09-24 13:16 [PATCH] Re: Testsuite failures due to Makefile issue
• 2003-09-28 21:25 Re: Nonlocal gotos on s390
• 2003-09-28 23:29 Re: Nonlocal gotos on s390

Vitaly Demin

• 2003-09-16 07:58 Partnering Enquiry from CifroSoft LLC (Russia)
• 2003-09-16 07:58 Partnering Enquiry from CifroSoft LLC (Russia)

Vladimir A. Merzliakov

• 2003-09-19 13:55 bits/demangle.h:155: warning: unused parameter 'cv_qualifier'

Vladimir Makarov

• 2003-09-15 15:44 Re: GCC DFA Scheduling Query

Vladimir N. Makarov

• 2003-09-05 14:00 Re: Probable GCC Bug

Vladimir Prus

• 2003-09-05 07:09 static runtime linking and libgcc/libgcc_s
• 2003-09-08 07:49 Re: static runtime linking and libgcc/libgcc_s

web

• 2003-09-01 23:15 VIRUS RESPONSE: Temp change in e-mail.
• 2003-09-01 23:50 VIRUS RESPONSE: Temp change in e-mail.

William Bader

• 2003-09-27 01:57 Patch for the bounds checking section of http://gcc.gnu.org/extensions.html

William S.

• 2003-09-01 05:38 [tree-ssa] Bootstrap on IRIX 6.5
• 2003-09-01 05:53 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap on IRIX 6.5
• 2003-09-05 16:04 [tree-ssa] Error '_muldi3' on mips-sgi-IRIX6.5
• 2003-09-06 06:21 Re: [tree-ssa] Error '_muldi3' on mips-sgi-IRIX6.5
• 2003-09-18 19:22 [tree-ssa] 'gmake install' not working on mips-sgi-IRIX6
• 2003-09-18 19:44 Re: [tree-ssa] DISREGARD PREVIOUS POST 'gmake install' not working on mips-sgi-IRIX6
• 2003-09-19 18:03 [tree-ssa] trouble with gfortran on mips-sgi-IRIX6

Wu Yongwei

• 2003-09-01 02:31 Re: G++ 3.3.1 Specialization bug?

Zack Weinberg

• 2003-09-02 06:38 Re: VSTa user wanted for testing configuration patch
• 2003-09-02 18:45 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 rewrite
• 2003-09-02 19:36 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 rewrite
• 2003-09-03 01:26 Re: implementing conio.h
• 2003-09-03 19:17 Re: alloca() called when i do not want it to be called
• 2003-09-04 17:18 Re: -Wold-style-cast
• 2003-09-07 16:57 Re: Redeclaration of used symbols
• 2003-09-08 06:28 Re: Patch for Bug No-8081
• 2003-09-08 23:57 Re: Patch for Bug No-8081
• 2003-09-09 17:03 Re: Patch for Bug No-8081
• 2003-09-09 17:09 Re: Patch for Bug No-8081
• 2003-09-12 19:30 Re: m68k target deprecations
• 2003-09-13 01:18 Mainline fails to bootstrap on ia64-hp-hpux11.23 - broken since Sep10
• 2003-09-14 00:33 Re: Status of gcc/intl and src/intl?
• 2003-09-16 01:59 Re: yacc/bison build errors on current CVS
• 2003-09-17 18:57 Re: Copying collection and our ggc_collect practices
• 2003-09-17 19:39 Re: Copying collection and our ggc_collect practices
• 2003-09-19 18:34 Re: Does GASP continue existing?
• 2003-09-19 21:12 Re: Does GASP continue existing?
• 2003-09-23 21:53 Re: Testsuite failures due to Makefile issue
• 2003-09-25 00:05 Re: What else can I disable fixproto for?
• 2003-09-30 20:11 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4

Zdenek Dvorak

• 2003-09-06 11:23 Re: "REG_FREQ (i) = 0;" needed for 3.3 branch?
• 2003-09-06 17:09 Redundant check for prologue_epilogue_contains in init_alias_analysis?
• 2003-09-07 09:59 Re: Redundant check for prologue_epilogue_contains in init_alias_analysis?
• 2003-09-30 21:57 tree-ssa-vrp
• 2003-09-30 22:06 Re: tree-ssa-vrp
• 2003-09-30 22:12 Re: tree-ssa-vrp

Zhou Hao

• 2003-09-01 09:38 static link

Ziemowit Laski

• 2003-09-09 21:32 Re: PR 7993
• 2003-09-12 22:10 Bootstrap broken on HEAD
• 2003-09-19 20:04 Re: Ziemowit Laski becomes Objective-C co-maintainer
• 2003-09-23 22:27 Re: Bootstrap failure in targhooks.c

Андрей Заболотный

• 2003-09-05 18:16 i386.c and _Optlink calling convention

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)