fortran archive
author index for March, 2012

This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

Andrew Benson

• 2012-03-25 00:50 "Symbol has no implicit type" bug
• 2012-03-26 17:58 Symbol has no implicit type bug
• 2012-03-26 18:15 Re: Symbol has no implicit type bug

Bernhard Reutner-Fischer

• 2012-03-01 21:10 [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules
• 2012-03-02 14:01 [PATCH, PR16464] testsuite: account for fortran loop-constructs
• 2012-03-02 14:08 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-03-02), Stage 1 starts now
• 2012-03-13 16:39 Re: [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules
• 2012-03-15 12:40 Re: [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules
• 2012-03-15 16:56 Re: [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules
• 2012-03-16 10:05 Re: [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules
• 2012-03-16 15:00 Re: [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules
• 2012-03-22 12:30 Re: [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules

Birendra Ramanuja

• 2012-03-12 14:48 noreply.bpdbankonline - account issue #27129999

Brad Finney

• 2012-03-20 05:02 Re: Requesting gfortran binaries for Linux & Windows
• 2012-03-21 00:48 Re: Requesting gfortran binaries for Linux & Windows

Convey, Christian J CIV NUWC NWPT

• 2012-03-27 13:09 Runs in 4.4 but not 4.5+ ?

Dominique Dhumieres

• 2012-03-12 23:20 Re: [Patch, libfortran] Reduce default precision for list-directed and G0 real output

FX

• 2012-03-02 22:35 [fortran, patch] Fix handling of backtrace options in the library
• 2012-03-03 07:45 [fortran, patch] Allow displaying backtraces from user code
• 2012-03-03 09:53 [fortran, patch] Improve module version error messages
• 2012-03-03 15:09 [fortran, patch] Fix display of locus when source contains wide characters
• 2012-03-03 15:14 Re: [Patch, Fortran] Add -Wc-binding-type warning
• 2012-03-03 21:03 Re: [fortran, patch] Improve module version error messages
• 2012-03-03 21:21 Re: [fortran, patch] Allow displaying backtraces from user code
• 2012-03-04 14:37 Re: [fortran, patch] Fix display of locus when source contains wide characters
• 2012-03-12 22:18 Re: [Patch, libfortran] Reduce default precision for list-directed and G0 real output
• 2012-03-14 13:41 Re: I have a big problem,my gfortran can not execute
• 2012-03-17 21:14 [fortran, patch] Follow-up "widechar error" patch

Jakub Jelinek

• 2012-03-02 14:05 Re: [PATCH, PR16464] testsuite: account for fortran loop-constructs
• 2012-03-15 19:36 Re: [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules

Janne Blomqvist

• 2012-03-03 15:49 Re: [fortran, patch] Improve module version error messages
• 2012-03-03 21:52 Re: [fortran, patch] Improve module version error messages
• 2012-03-05 11:52 Re: [fortran, patch] Fix handling of backtrace options in the library
• 2012-03-08 22:40 [Patch, libfortran] PR 52434/48878/38199 Improve floating point formatted writes
• 2012-03-09 10:01 Re: [Patch, libfortran] PR 52434/48878/38199 Improve floating point formatted writes
• 2012-03-12 21:29 [Patch, libfortran] Reduce default precision for list-directed and G0 real output
• 2012-03-13 23:03 [Patch, fortran] PR 49010/24518 MOD/MODULO fixes
• 2012-03-15 06:55 Re: [Patch, libfortran] PR 52434/48878/38199 Improve floating point formatted writes
• 2012-03-15 15:43 Re: [Patch, libfortran] RFC: Shared vtables, constification
• 2012-03-15 19:02 [Patch, fortran] Use BUILT_IN_IROUND
• 2012-03-15 20:28 Re: [Patch, fortran] Use BUILT_IN_IROUND
• 2012-03-16 08:17 Re: [Patch, fortran] Use BUILT_IN_IROUND
• 2012-03-17 17:23 [Patch, libfortran] PR 52608 F formatting with scale factor
• 2012-03-17 18:25 Re: [Patch, libfortran] PR 52608 F formatting with scale factor
• 2012-03-21 21:45 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR 49010/24518 MOD/MODULO fixes
• 2012-03-23 08:58 [Patch, fortran] Remove unused GFC_MAX_LINE macro
• 2012-03-23 14:31 [Patch, libfortran] Use calloc instead of malloc+memset
• 2012-03-26 15:17 [Patch, libfortran] Combine get_mem and internal_malloc_size
• 2012-03-26 16:00 Re: [Patch, libfortran] Combine get_mem and internal_malloc_size
• 2012-03-26 21:43 Re: [Patch V2] libgfortran: do not assume libm
• 2012-03-27 08:39 Re: [Patch V2] libgfortran: do not assume libm
• 2012-03-28 08:12 Re: [patch, fortran-dev] Use fixed variable sizes for stride calculations

Jerry DeLisle

• 2012-03-14 23:41 Re: [Patch, libfortran] Reduce default precision for list-directed and G0 real output
• 2012-03-14 23:53 Re: [Patch, libfortran] PR 52434/48878/38199 Improve floating point formatted writes
• 2012-03-15 10:34 Re: [Patch, libfortran] PR 52434/48878/38199 Improve floating point formatted writes
• 2012-03-15 22:37 Status of i686 builds and Cygwin builds of trunk
• 2012-03-15 22:39 Re: [Patch, libfortran] RFC: Shared vtables, constification
• 2012-03-19 22:30 Re: Requesting gfortran binaries for Linux & Windows
• 2012-03-24 20:45 Re: Requesting gfortran binaries for Linux & Windows

John L. Males

• 2012-03-12 22:03 Possible Code Performance Disparity using "parameter"
• 2012-03-13 00:45 Re[02]: Possible Code Performance Disparity using "parameter"

Katherine Holcomb

• 2012-03-27 16:49 Re: environment modules for gcc/gfortran?
• 2012-03-28 13:56 Re: environment modules for gcc/gfortran?

linel patrice

• 2012-03-28 14:12 Re : bug realloc-lhs

Manfred Schwarb

• 2012-03-28 15:16 Re: environment modules for gcc/gfortran?
• 2012-03-28 20:34 Re: upgrading gcc/gfortran on linux, glibc=2.5

Mikael Morin

• 2012-03-08 19:14 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 52469
• 2012-03-08 19:37 Re: [patch] Cleanup fortran/convert.c
• 2012-03-09 00:04 Re: [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules

Mike Stump

• 2012-03-13 20:31 Re: [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules

N.M. Maclaren

• 2012-03-07 12:05 Re: Help with interpreting TYPE(*) with INTENT(OUT)

Paolo Bonzini

• 2012-03-22 10:07 Re: [Patch V2] libgfortran: do not assume libm
• 2012-03-30 12:40 Re: [Patch V2] libgfortran: do not assume libm

patnel97269-gfortran at yahoo dot fr

• 2012-03-27 19:06 bug realloc-lhs
• 2012-03-28 16:23 Re : bug realloc-lhs
• 2012-03-28 19:26 Re : Re : bug realloc-lhs
• 2012-03-29 16:15 Re : Re : Re : bug realloc-lhs

Paul Richard Thomas

• 2012-03-02 10:12 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR52452 [4.5-4.7 Regr.] Intrinsic wrongly rejected
• 2012-03-03 07:41 Re: [4.8, Fortran, Patch] PR 48820 - Support TYPE(*) of TS29113
• 2012-03-10 16:48 Re: [Patch, Fortran] Change array descriptor's "data" to "base_addr" for TS 29113
• 2012-03-12 08:42 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 52542 - Fix PROCEDURE() with Bind(C)
• 2012-03-12 13:36 Re: [Fortran-dev, patch, committed] Minor fixes
• 2012-03-18 20:09 [Patch, fortran] PR41600 - [OOP] SELECT TYPE with associate-name => exp: Arrays not supported
• 2012-03-26 07:06 Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Requesting gfortran binaries for Linux & Windows
• 2012-03-28 12:58 Re: bug realloc-lhs
• 2012-03-28 14:26 Re: environment modules for gcc/gfortran?
• 2012-03-28 16:30 Re: environment modules for gcc/gfortran?
• 2012-03-28 16:34 Re: upgrading gcc/gfortran on linux, glibc=2.5
• 2012-03-28 20:23 Re: Re : Re : bug realloc-lhs
• 2012-03-28 20:50 [Patch, fortran] PR52652 - call to gfc_match_asynchronous for allocatable at parse.c line 164

Rainer Orth

• 2012-03-19 17:36 Re: [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules

Ralf Corsepius

• 2012-03-20 09:58 Re: [Patch] libgfortran: do not assume libm

Richard Guenther

• 2012-03-02 10:25 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR52452 [4.5-4.7 Regr.] Intrinsic wrongly rejected
• 2012-03-02 14:09 Re: [PATCH, PR16464] testsuite: account for fortran loop-constructs
• 2012-03-02 14:38 Re: [PATCH, PR16464] testsuite: account for fortran loop-constructs
• 2012-03-12 12:00 Re: Many regressions with: [patch] Cleanup fortran/convert.c
• 2012-03-15 15:57 Re: [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules
• 2012-03-16 11:21 Re: [Patch, fortran] Use BUILT_IN_IROUND

Rouson, Damian

• 2012-03-19 20:28 Requesting gfortran binaries for Linux & Windows
• 2012-03-24 22:34 Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Requesting gfortran binaries for Linux & Windows

Steve Kargl

• 2012-03-03 15:42 Re: [fortran, patch] Allow displaying backtraces from user code
• 2012-03-03 15:47 Re: [fortran, patch] Improve module version error messages
• 2012-03-03 15:55 Re: [Patch, Fortran] Add -Wc-binding-type warning
• 2012-03-12 22:18 Re: Possible Code Performance Disparity using "parameter"
• 2012-03-13 02:48 Re: Possible Code Performance Disparity using "parameter"
• 2012-03-26 15:37 Re: [Patch, libfortran] Combine get_mem and internal_malloc_size
• 2012-03-27 19:20 Re: bug realloc-lhs
• 2012-03-28 16:49 Re: Re : bug realloc-lhs
• 2012-03-28 20:27 Re: Re : Re : bug realloc-lhs

Steven Bosscher

• 2012-03-04 13:46 Re: [fortran, patch] Fix display of locus when source contains wide characters
• 2012-03-05 23:31 [patch] Clean up f95-lang.c a bit
• 2012-03-06 20:42 [patch] Cleanup fortran/convert.c
• 2012-03-10 11:21 Re: Many regressions with: [patch] Cleanup fortran/convert.c

Thomas Koenig

• 2012-03-10 17:22 Re: Many regressions with: [patch] Cleanup fortran/convert.c
• 2012-03-11 17:35 Re: [Fortran-dev, patch] Use only lbound/extent/sm in the array descriptor
• 2012-03-24 14:14 [patch, fortran-dev] Use fixed variable sizes for stride calculations
• 2012-03-25 09:28 [patch, fortran] Fix PR 52668, bogus warning for only list
• 2012-03-26 18:08 Re: Symbol has no implicit type bug

Tim Prince

• 2012-03-19 21:07 Re: Requesting gfortran binaries for Linux & Windows
• 2012-03-29 00:59 Re: gcc versions: stable vs development

Timlu

• 2012-03-14 04:52 I have a big problem,my gfortran can not execute

Tobias Burnus

• 2012-03-02 09:35 [Patch, Fortran] PR52452 [4.5-4.7 Regr.] Intrinsic wrongly rejected
• 2012-03-02 11:28 [4.8, Fortran, Patch] PR 48820 - Support TYPE(*) of TS29113
• 2012-03-02 13:03 Fwd: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2012-03-02)
• 2012-03-02 13:18 Fwd: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-03-02), Stage 1 starts now
• 2012-03-02 14:42 Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-03-02), Stage 1 starts now
• 2012-03-03 10:13 Re: [4.8, Fortran, Patch] PR 48820 - Support TYPE(*) of TS29113
• 2012-03-03 14:17 Re: [4.8, Fortran, Patch] PR 48820 - Support TYPE(*) of TS29113
• 2012-03-03 14:23 [Patch, Fortran] Add -Wc-binding-type warning
• 2012-03-03 18:56 Re: [4.8, Fortran, Patch] PR 48820 - Support TYPE(*) of TS29113
• 2012-03-06 09:00 Re: [patch] Clean up f95-lang.c a bit
• 2012-03-06 17:02 [Fortran-dev] Merged from trunk; [patch, committed] ISO_Fortran_binding.h
• 2012-03-07 09:02 Help with interpreting TYPE(*) with INTENT(OUT)
• 2012-03-08 14:13 [Patch, Fortran] PR 52469
• 2012-03-09 21:30 [Fortran-dev, Patch] Fix extent calculation, fix test suite failures
• 2012-03-09 22:00 [Patch, Fortran] PR 52542 - Fix PROCEDURE() with Bind(C)
• 2012-03-10 10:19 Many regressions with: [patch] Cleanup fortran/convert.c
• 2012-03-10 15:53 Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 52542 - Fix PROCEDURE() with Bind(C)
• 2012-03-10 15:53 [Patch, Fortran] Change array descriptor's "data" to "base_addr" for TS 29113
• 2012-03-11 13:07 [Fortran-dev, patch] Use only lbound/extent/sm in the array descriptor
• 2012-03-11 18:45 Re: [Fortran-dev, patch] Use only lbound/extent/sm in the array descriptor
• 2012-03-12 12:50 [Fortran-dev, patch, committed] Minor fixes
• 2012-03-12 18:01 Re: [Fortran-dev, patch, committed] Minor fixes
• 2012-03-14 07:12 Re: useful debug flags?
• 2012-03-15 11:13 [Patch, Fortran] PR52585 - Fix ASSOCIATE with proc-pointer dummies
• 2012-03-15 20:15 Re: [Patch, fortran] Use BUILT_IN_IROUND
• 2012-03-16 18:38 Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2012 - Call for mentors
• 2012-03-18 22:17 Re: [Patch, fortran] PR41600 - [OOP] SELECT TYPE with associate-name => exp: Arrays not supported
• 2012-03-19 07:04 Re: [fortran, patch] Follow-up "widechar error" patch
• 2012-03-20 09:49 Re: [Patch] libgfortran: do not assume libm
• 2012-03-22 20:57 Re: [Patch V2] libgfortran: do not assume libm

Tom Roche

• 2012-03-14 02:36 useful debug flags?
• 2012-03-27 15:40 environment modules for gcc/gfortran?
• 2012-03-27 22:38 Re: environment modules for gcc/gfortran?
• 2012-03-28 15:48 upgrading gcc/gfortran on linux, glibc=2.5
• 2012-03-28 23:48 gcc versions: stable vs development

Tristan Gingold

• 2012-03-20 09:02 [Patch] libgfortran: do not assume libm
• 2012-03-20 09:57 Re: [Patch] libgfortran: do not assume libm
• 2012-03-20 10:16 Re: [Patch] libgfortran: do not assume libm
• 2012-03-22 08:30 [Patch V2] libgfortran: do not assume libm
• 2012-03-26 08:44 Re: [Patch V2] libgfortran: do not assume libm
• 2012-03-27 07:51 Re: [Patch V2] libgfortran: do not assume libm
• 2012-03-27 08:01 Re: [Patch V2] libgfortran: do not assume libm
• 2012-03-27 09:29 Re: [Patch V2] libgfortran: do not assume libm
• 2012-03-30 10:22 Re: [Patch V2] libgfortran: do not assume libm

Uros Bizjak

• 2012-03-30 11:10 [PATCH, libgfortran]: Fix PR52758, out of bounds access

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)