This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Re : Re : bug realloc-lhs

From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
To: "patnel97269-gfortran at yahoo dot fr" <patnel97269-gfortran at yahoo dot fr>
Cc: Paul Richard Thomas <paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com>, "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:26:53 -0700
Subject: Re: Re : Re : bug realloc-lhs
References: <1332875169.9730.YahooMailNeo@web132403.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <20120327192019.GA69970@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <CAGkQGi+-Jv2tVsFrgcLooMCOZqqjWr53w2MKgdxUiPRVq26LJQ@mail.gmail.com> <1332951795.3800.YahooMailNeo@web132406.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <20120328164931.GA6008@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <1332962769.87776.YahooMailNeo@web132405.mail.ird.yahoo.com>

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 08:26:09PM +0100, patnel97269-gfortran@yahoo.fr wrote:
> The function have no side effect,

It has a side-effect.  toto() is explicitly deallocating
memory of the actual argument p1 associated with the dummy
argument dd.

> and the user produces this function especiallly for the
> case. ?Nothing prevent the user from deallocating an array
> of the type inside the function.?

Nothing prevents a user from point a gun at his foot
and pulling a trigger.  

-- 
Steve

References:
- bug realloc-lhs
  - From: patnel97269-gfortran at yahoo dot fr
- Re: bug realloc-lhs
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: bug realloc-lhs
  - From: Paul Richard Thomas
- Re : bug realloc-lhs
  - From: patnel97269-gfortran at yahoo dot fr
- Re: Re : bug realloc-lhs
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re : Re : bug realloc-lhs
  - From: patnel97269-gfortran at yahoo dot fr

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]