This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-03-02), Stage 1 starts now
- From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep dot dot dot nop at gmail dot com>
- To: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>
- Cc: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 15:08:39 +0100
- Subject: Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-03-02), Stage 1 starts now
- Authentication-results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rep.dot.nop@gmail.com designates 10.180.8.164 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rep.dot.nop@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=rep.dot.nop@gmail.com
- References: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1203021215460.18230@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <4F50C886.4020008@net-b.de>
On 2 March 2012 14:17, Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de> wrote:
> b) To be reviewed:
> * implicitly cleanup-modules
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-03/msg00000.html
It would be good if somebody could see if we have a race-condition
with dg-final when running the testsuite in parallel (think -j1024 on
an MP machine). We do not have a race there, AFAICS.
We do, however, have conflicting module names so one testcase's
cleanup can stomp on another testcases intermediate module -> bam.
This should be fixed mid-term, regardless of this patch being applied
or not.
PS: for me gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 unreliable results. Anybody else see this?
cheers,