This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Beyond GCC 3.0: Summing Up
- To: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot COM>
- Subject: Re: Beyond GCC 3.0: Summing Up
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:30:22 +0100
- cc: bernds at redhat dot com (Bernd Schmidt), mark at codesourcery dot com (Mark Mitchell), aoliva at redhat dot com (Alexandre Oliva), dewar at gnat dot com (dewar at gnat dot com), kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu), gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org (gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org), Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
- Organization: ARM Ltd.
- Reply-To: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
> > [1] Some regressions we do not even care about. So what if romp
> > doesn't build?
>
> Agreed, we should only care about primary platforms.
I disagree. We should care about any platform that has an active user
base. Otherwise we end up defining the problem away.
Look at the current list of primary platforms, as defined for the gcc-3.0
list -- it's depressingly narrow in scope.