This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Beyond GCC 3.0: Summing Up
- To: "Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com" <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>, Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot COM>
- Subject: Re: Beyond GCC 3.0: Summing Up
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:42:13 -0800
- cc: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at redhat dot com>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, "dewar at gnat dot com" <dewar at gnat dot com>, "kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu" <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
--On Tuesday, July 10, 2001 6:30 PM +0100 Richard Earnshaw
<rearnsha@arm.com> wrote:
>> > [1] Some regressions we do not even care about. So what if romp
>> > doesn't build?
>>
>> Agreed, we should only care about primary platforms.
>
> I disagree. We should care about any platform that has an active user
> base. Otherwise we end up defining the problem away.
I agree. I'm not sure what the right metric is, exactly, but it should be
a large set of platforms.