This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Beyond GCC 3.0: Summing Up
- To: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
- Subject: Re: Beyond GCC 3.0: Summing Up
- From: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot COM>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: jbuck at synopsys dot com (Joe Buck), bernds at redhat dot com (Bernd Schmidt), mark at codesourcery dot com (Mark Mitchell), aoliva at redhat dot com (Alexandre Oliva), dewar at gnat dot com (dewar at gnat dot com), kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu), gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org (gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org)
>
> > > [1] Some regressions we do not even care about. So what if romp
> > > doesn't build?
> >
> > Agreed, we should only care about primary platforms.
>
> I disagree. We should care about any platform that has an active user
> base. Otherwise we end up defining the problem away.
OK, we should define a list of platforms we care about. gcc has
(bitrotted) support for processors that no longer exist.