This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
November 30, 2010
November 29, 2010
November 28, 2010
| 23:22 | Re: using static libraries | Josef Ahmad |
| 22:32 | Re: Cloog/PPL 0.15.10 build failure | Arnaud Lacombe |
| 22:12 | Cloog/PPL 0.15.10 build failure | Arnaud Lacombe |
| 20:00 | Re: using static libraries | Kristoff Bonne |
| 11:49 | Re: Fail to compile Boost make_shared when -std=c++0x on | ééä |
| 11:39 | Re: Fail to compile Boost make_shared when -std=c++0x on | Marc Glisse |
| 08:22 | AstroTown - Science Fiction | Saulo Fonseca |
| 03:38 | Dwarf debug location list | majia gm |
| 02:48 | Fail to compile Boost make_shared when -std=c++0x on | ééä |
| 00:38 | Re: using static libraries | Josef Ahmad |
November 27, 2010
| 20:15 | using static libraries | Kristoff Bonne |
| 14:36 | Re: building gcc 4.4.5 from source on Fedora 13 | Mr Dash Four |
| 13:58 | SSE instruction set disabled when i'm using -flto | Marcin MirosÅaw |
| 03:31 | Cross compiling gcc for ARM and dependency on libgcc_s.so.1 for pthread_cancel | Vincent Forbes |
| 00:35 | Re: Exception Handling implementation with Return Address (RA) having PC right shifted by 1 | Ian Lance Taylor |
November 26, 2010
| 19:23 | Re: building gcc 4.4.5 from source on Fedora 13 | Andrew Haley |
| 18:35 | building gcc 4.4.5 from source on Fedora 13 | Mr Dash Four |
| 18:31 | Re: Symbol Visibility Problem in C Source File | Andrew Haley |
| 18:10 | Symbol Visibility Problem in C Source File | Jeffrey Walton |
| 16:27 | Re: Floating point: just 20 digits of precision | Bob Plantz |
| 16:10 | Re: Floating point: just 20 digits of precision | Elias Gabriel Amaral da Silva |
| 15:10 | Re: Floating point: just 20 digits of precision | Marc Glisse |
| 15:03 | Re: Floating point: just 20 digits of precision | Andrew Haley |
| 14:39 | Re: Floating point: just 20 digits of precision | Axel Freyn |
| 13:25 | Floating point: just 20 digits of precision | Elias Gabriel Amaral da Silva |
| 12:58 | Change symbol visibility in library (local -> external) | Jeffrey Walton |
| 11:53 | RE: Exception Handling implementation with Return Address (RA) having PC right shifted by 1 | Sumanth Gundapaneni |
November 25, 2010
| 15:33 | Undocumented differences between -M and -MD | J.T. Conklin |
| 10:10 | Re: preserving comments | Sharanbr |
| 08:28 | Re: Failure to recognize siginfo_t._sifields | Cedric Roux |
| 00:11 | Re: Why do floating point operations differ between -m64 -O0/-O1 and -m32 -O0? | Tim Prince |
November 24, 2010
| 22:16 | Re: Why do floating point operations differ between -m64 -O0/-O1 and -m32 -O0? | Robert Dell |
| 21:40 | Segfault when dereferencing %rax after -static compiling | Amittai Aviram |
| 21:07 | Re: Why do floating point operations differ between -m64 -O0/-O1 and -m32 -O0? | Bob Plantz |
| 20:20 | Failure to recognize siginfo_t._sifields | Amittai Aviram |
| 16:37 | Re: preserving comments | Philip Herron |
| 15:09 | Re: Why do floating point operations differ between -m64 -O0/-O1 and -m32 -O0? | Tim Prince |
| 12:44 | preserving comments | Sharanbr |
| 11:00 | march option for Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5410 @ 2.33GHz | Rainer M Krug |
| 10:42 | Re: Why do floating point operations differ between -m64 -O0/-O1 and -m32 -O0? | Marc Glisse |
| 08:26 | Re: Why do floating point operations differ between -m64 -O0/-O1 and -m32 -O0? | Nikos Chantziaras |
November 23, 2010
| 16:44 | Re: Exception Handling implementation with Return Address (RA) having PC right shifted by 1 | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 14:23 | Re: Why do floating point operations differ between -m64 -O0/-O1 and -m32 -O0? | Vincent Lefevre |
| 13:31 | Re: Why do floating point operations differ between -m64 -O0/-O1 and -m32 -O0? | Tim Prince |
| 08:40 | Re: Why do floating point operations differ between -m64 -O0/-O1 and -m32 -O0? | Marc Glisse |
| 07:52 | Re: help with g++ and strict aliasing on x86-64 | Alberto Griggio |
| 06:25 | Why do floating point operations differ between -m64 -O0/-O1 and -m32 -O0? | Nikos Chantziaras |
| 05:52 | RE: Exception Handling implementation with Return Address (RA) having PC right shifted by 1 | Sumanth Gundapaneni |
November 22, 2010
November 21, 2010
| 21:34 | Re: question on cmath (gcc 4.5.1) | Gabriel Dos Reis |
| 08:16 | Re: Meyers Item 4 Singleton in presence of threading | Paweł Sikora |
| 07:39 | Re: Meyers Item 4 Singleton in presence of threading | Tim Prince |
| 01:16 | Re: Meyers Item 4 Singleton in presence of threading | Miles Bader |
November 20, 2010
| 20:33 | Re: g++ 4.5.1 on OpenSolaris | asyropoulos |
| 15:26 | Re: Meyers Item 4 Singleton in presence of threading | Tim Prince |
| 10:40 | Re: ambiguity of ld manual regarding to -L option!! | Tim Prince |
| 09:54 | Re: -L option in GNU linker ld | Andi Hellmund |
| 08:34 | -L option in GNU linker ld | ali hagigat |
| 08:31 | ambiguity of ld manual regarding to -L option!! | ali hagigat |
| 08:24 | Meyers Item 4 Singleton in presence of threading | Patrick Horgan |
| 07:58 | archive searching!! | ali hagigat |
| 07:38 | minor BUG for GCC recognizing upper-case of -T option! | ali hagigat |
| 00:08 | Re: g++ 4.5.1 on OpenSolaris | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 00:05 | Re: inlining memcpy | Ian Lance Taylor |
November 19, 2010
November 18, 2010
| 22:41 | Re: One-way stack support | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 22:38 | Re: VFP unit failed | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 22:36 | Re: Get "int from double" conversion warnings also with GCC 4.4.5 | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 20:01 | arm -msoft-float and -lfloat question | Bryan Hundven |
| 16:58 | One-way stack support | John Tobey |
| 11:19 | test case | raju goruganti |
| 11:16 | VFP unit failed | raju goruganti |
| 09:31 | Get "int from double" conversion warnings also with GCC 4.4.5 | Karl Krach |
November 17, 2010
| 18:58 | Re: inline bug (?) | jorge . perez |
| 18:51 | Re: incompatible GCC 4.4.5 and 4.5.1 libstdc++ ? | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 18:10 | Re: inline bug (?) | Axel Freyn |
| 17:54 | Re: inline bug (?) | Eric Botcazou |
| 17:19 | Re: incompatible GCC 4.4.5 and 4.5.1 libstdc++ ? | Christophe Lyon |
| 16:47 | inline bug (?) | Jorge PEREZ |
| 16:36 | Re: Using __cxa_atexit on Solaris | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 14:35 | Re: Using __cxa_atexit on Solaris | rvyas |
| 14:35 | Invoking atomic functions from a C++ shared lib (or should I force linking with -lgcc?) | Christophe Lyon |
| 05:06 | building ada (or gnat?) | kevin diggs |
| 01:50 | Re: Clarification on Gcc's strict aliasing rules | Patrick Horgan |
| 01:15 | Re: Using __cxa_atexit on Solaris | Ian Lance Taylor |
November 16, 2010
| 22:08 | Re: output messages | Alfred M. Szmidt |
| 21:25 | Re: output messages | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 21:01 | Using __cxa_atexit on Solaris | rvyas |
| 19:27 | Re: output messages | kevin diggs |
| 18:20 | Re: output messages | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 18:03 | Re: c++0x tuple vs. pair | Miles Bader |
| 17:38 | output messages | kevin diggs |
| 15:35 | Re: Where are standard system directories? | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 15:33 | Re: c++0x tuple vs. pair | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 15:17 | Re: problem with my @gcc.gnu.org address | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 14:55 | Re: (linker) default search path for ld | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 09:28 | Re: problem with my @gcc.gnu.org address | Fabien Chêne |
| 08:45 | Where are standard system directories? | ali hagigat |
| 07:10 | Re: (linker) default search path for ld | ali hagigat |
| 07:04 | c++0x tuple vs. pair | Miles Bader |
| 06:32 | Re: (linker) default search path for ld | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 05:21 | (linker) default search path for ld | ali hagigat |
| 03:25 | Re: -isystem and local includes | Zadirion |
November 15, 2010
| 22:44 | Re: problem with my @gcc.gnu.org address | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 22:42 | Re: proper configuring & installation ??? | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 22:34 | Re: Are the gcc memory hooks sometimes bypassed? | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 22:32 | Re: -isystem and local includes | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 21:38 | problem with my @gcc.gnu.org address | Fabien Chêne |
| 20:03 | Re: proper configuring & installation ??? | kevin diggs |
| 17:10 | Re: double argument casting | Jorge PEREZ |
| 14:00 | Are the gcc memory hooks sometimes bypassed? | Fabian van der Werf |
| 09:46 | Re: Clarification on Gcc's strict aliasing rules | Francis Moreau |
| 09:30 | Re: Clarification on Gcc's strict aliasing rules | Andrew Haley |
November 14, 2010
| 16:49 | Re: Can gcc show status of a compilation? | Tony Wetmore |
| 11:53 | Re: -isystem and local includes | Zadirion |
| 11:43 | -isystem and local includes | Zadirion |
| 07:26 | Can gcc show status of a compilation? | Greatwolf |
November 13, 2010
| 01:11 | Re: proper configuring & installation ??? | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 00:22 | proper configuring & installation ??? | kevin diggs |
November 12, 2010
November 11, 2010
| 17:04 | Re: operator new catch parameter type gcc 4.3.2 | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 17:02 | Re: operator new catch parameter type gcc 4.3.2 | Brian McGrew |
| 16:55 | Re: operator new catch parameter type gcc 4.3.2 | me22 |
| 16:42 | Re: Generating a symbol-file for a release version. | tom |
| 15:12 | Re: Generating a symbol-file for a release version. | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 14:16 | Re: Mutually Exclusive switches | Tim Prince |
| 14:00 | Re: Mutually Exclusive switches | Brian Budge |
| 12:57 | Mutually Exclusive switches | tom |
| 12:01 | Re: Clarification on Gcc's strict aliasing rules | Tim Prince |
| 11:03 | operator new catch parameter type gcc 4.3.2 | Jan M |
| 10:34 | Re: Generating a symbol-file for a release version. | tom |
| 09:23 | Re: Clarification on Gcc's strict aliasing rules | Andrew Haley |
| 06:16 | Re: gcc build without debug (no -g) | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 06:13 | Re: "complete" gcc bootstrap | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 06:09 | Re: MIPS 32-bit ABI stack pointer | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 06:06 | Re: MIPS 32-bit ABI stack pointer | Ian Lance Taylor |
November 10, 2010
November 09, 2010
| 23:39 | Error message "-T: command not found" building 4.5.1 on Solaris 10 SPARC | Dr. David Kirkby |
| 22:57 | Re: Clarification on Gcc's strict aliasing rules | John Boncek |
| 19:41 | Re: Clarification on Gcc's strict aliasing rules | Patrick Horgan |
| 19:13 | Troubles downloading gfortran for Tiger | Mario Bernal |
| 16:06 | Re: bootstrap problem? | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 14:22 | Re: [C++0x] code that used to be accepted isn't accepted anymore (related to constexpr changes?) | Zdeněk Sojka |
| 11:33 | bootstrap problem? | Salvatore Filippone |
| 08:20 | Re: Clarification on Gcc's strict aliasing rules | Francis Moreau |
| 08:11 | Re: Clarification on Gcc's strict aliasing rules | Francis Moreau |
November 08, 2010
November 07, 2010
November 06, 2010
| 23:38 | Interesting void* bug | Hilton Medeiros |
| 23:14 | Re: Clarification on Gcc's strict aliasing rules | Patrick Horgan |
| 22:15 | Clarification on Gcc's strict aliasing rules | Francis Moreau |
| 18:37 | Re: [C++0x] code that used to be accepted isn't accepted anymore (related to constexpr changes?) | Gabriel Dos Reis |
| 17:30 | Re: [C++0x] code that used to be accepted isn't accepted anymore (related to constexpr changes?) | Benoit Jacob |
| 16:29 | Re: no mails from gcc-bugzilla since I changed e-mail | Georg Lay |
| 03:43 | Re: where we can find libjpeg.a? | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 02:18 | where we can find libjpeg.a? | eric lin |
| 00:15 | [C++0x] code that used to be accepted isn't accepted anymore (related to constexpr changes?) | Zdeněk Sojka |
November 05, 2010
November 04, 2010
November 03, 2010
| 15:58 | Biet thu sinh thai cach HN 40km . Dtich 721m2 - Gia 3 ty | Nguyen The Anh |
| 14:10 | Re: Problem with libiconv | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 11:36 | Re: Problem with libiconv | Rifat Mahmud |
| 11:02 | Re: Problem with libiconv | Marc Glisse |
| 10:53 | Problem with libiconv | Rifat Mahmud |
November 02, 2010
| 23:40 | Re: make error on gcc4.4.2010102, plz help | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 23:37 | make error on gcc4.4.2010102, plz help | eric lin |
| 21:13 | Bad struct name in gdb with g++ 4.1.2 | Michel METZGER |
| 19:54 | Re: not quite polymorphism | Andrew Bell |
| 19:46 | Re: not quite polymorphism | eric lin |
| 13:29 | Re: a question about linker and addresses | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 11:58 | a question about linker and addresses | ali hagigat |
November 01, 2010
| 22:06 | Re: double argument casting | Eric Botcazou |
| 20:42 | Re: Newbie: building libgomp | Ian Lance Taylor |
| 20:21 | Newbie: building libgomp | Amittai Aviram |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]