This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the libstdc++ project. See the libstdc++ home page for more information.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@cygnus.com> writes: | ( Now that I think about this, maybe it would be better to have the | classname::membername in the changelogs instead of just the membername. ) Ok. That seems to be a sensible way to go: we may have a member foo() and a non-member foo(). [...] | > Hmm. A good question. I would be in favor of just (functionY), because you | > can usually tell from the context of the file what class you are talking | > about. The additions to the GNU coding standard for C++ in particular are | > in C++-STYLE, you might want to check this out, although it says nothing | > about this specific issue. | | I'd go for foo::bar, since it guards against a file then containing two | different classes that contain `bar'. Exactly. -- Gaby