This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT


On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, Segher Boessenkool wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 01:43:48PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 11:29 +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > > On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Should we go with the gcc-reparent.git repo now?
> > > 
> > > I think we should go with the reposurgeon conversion, with all Richard's 
> > > improvements to commit messages.  gcc-reparent.git has issues of its own; 
> > > at least, checking the list of branches shows some branches are missing.  
> 
> You need to provide proof of that.

classpath-generics gcj/classpath-095-import-branch libstdcxx_so_7-2-branch 
st/binutils st/mono-based-binutils.  There are also tags in the GCC SVN 
repository in /branches/st/tags, some of which are missing in the 
conversion and the rest of which are in refs/heads/ when refs/tags/ would 
be more appropriate.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]