This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT
- From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>
- Cc: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>, Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim dot kuvyrkov at linaro dot org>, "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 13:56:44 +0000
- Subject: Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT
- Ironport-sdr: tyyCqCz9OYwHK3Va9C/oAm6ThMQr85WFluczRt3fYlhCCwp2M6vTva4iLp45HITjk840U3zku0 lbirhcAyzRbdiG0wfT4aM5u05zwmy3yfV3YCXTJZHUAwKknG3yFgNqs7wfpotwr2uF3ZJErr8u Ls8c0wAmxJ6w2vUtixQ9KJFlvdwxODeHiJrTy/f1BuRrOHg1fZJJjVg7upLrMYzL2nc+3Enpy/ DxKyoe8d8dDiwUIUDqn98+v9Cj5tuWelIhV/Pesxx9cjOgE6klJKVp1xeIxoUyLhkogWluIKul rAE=
- Ironport-sdr: HQVvNCM6wwtJiMfAA6fLrzuPU8iQWpX12bPhliX7zyzrfoWcLoyWclnmWkacaGZjnAs4l8JOgB eYL9arksT9NjCuZrXWOyFw4uvWcxZhRAYN74Qjd1WKKxrxtKWZRebJwd+NfCrjLUb1jIS3ffnx H1VAJBTraH0WQ1H9WX7sbYY4AS/6iob7irpS+D1IGreNk3CxAoB9mFb0Lv0wKygm068QXwZz5A xcecS9jXca5XEb4O+TCCHD3cH8roHhIpx7cKLMdHNzdz2d+9Bi/ixbXLaI7gUOg+W9PbSMljHR GL8=
- References: <1685e719-738f-dd4e-c39c-c08e495b202e@arm.com> <9E009921-96EA-44A2-A06A-232711227E69@linaro.org> <BEB3D1BD-86C3-4B1A-A1BB-62461A7DCAD8@linaro.org> <da35e7b40c21d0b880199143cc4b64a393368e8d.camel@klomp.org> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1912161117300.3352@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <a6b5dfe3b66b18c371c3d891c23277d96c8798dd.camel@klomp.org> <20191216133632.GC3152@gate.crashing.org>
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 01:43:48PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 11:29 +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > > On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > >
> > > > Should we go with the gcc-reparent.git repo now?
> > >
> > > I think we should go with the reposurgeon conversion, with all Richard's
> > > improvements to commit messages. gcc-reparent.git has issues of its own;
> > > at least, checking the list of branches shows some branches are missing.
>
> You need to provide proof of that.
classpath-generics gcj/classpath-095-import-branch libstdcxx_so_7-2-branch
st/binutils st/mono-based-binutils. There are also tags in the GCC SVN
repository in /branches/st/tags, some of which are missing in the
conversion and the rest of which are in refs/heads/ when refs/tags/ would
be more appropriate.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com