This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT
- From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>
- Cc: Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim dot kuvyrkov at linaro dot org>, "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 11:29:22 +0000
- Subject: Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT
- Ironport-sdr: Oxjb6g1rUl8QvK0Pk8c4DamABgSZsci1CJDl8fSIwEZos2CkExyxpGURsTiLvYUEbjBRRQ9COX QBDwvwmN0EWDwUjIWT3JNARKtK81ekI1revgH3uTtiuquKTq5BiFRA7JWhOabQpkWVMAfJ87gm kTJyC3rz77o9A6SMVViajgqhi6RjByDu4yWX000k875dpleMQfwtEvvnnwBfdBxtU+A8/YtfdU IxqY0iPHg7AOC8bXh26j1n0ufVP04jEaB7G9CNmE4389dA1m3nrWy6JA2xl9lZwwGDk3V0oAnI WeM=
- Ironport-sdr: DYZaulXZnHyFiL/VsOwVXADbHk4RYX5YjSBtuC+smU8RfK/XEE9CJsLkVvyWd+AMOcStRCA09C 33Esp2ug1kAi3x5vby4ZG5bo8GkFmLmjKt/nqaHaZFUEcw3kR+9B3kwHdyca6PSUe3dHfgL3S3 k4JZFzJJJ5rn1Ee3GXWl9xzfHyiw6WXH989yMyBS9Qa9UvREaI0J0zG6Cc54BqMJWlna4GmwQV EZ4vkrX/T5roJGdOBTZTtHw35Gb4sXtqID7zKbgOhI02+yXh0CAUIbaQuSUZlF+dzNkUZ36swg 798=
- References: <1685e719-738f-dd4e-c39c-c08e495b202e@arm.com> <9E009921-96EA-44A2-A06A-232711227E69@linaro.org> <BEB3D1BD-86C3-4B1A-A1BB-62461A7DCAD8@linaro.org> <da35e7b40c21d0b880199143cc4b64a393368e8d.camel@klomp.org>
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Should we go with the gcc-reparent.git repo now?
I think we should go with the reposurgeon conversion, with all Richard's
improvements to commit messages. gcc-reparent.git has issues of its own;
at least, checking the list of branches shows some branches are missing.
So both conversions can still be considered works in progress.
However, we should also note that stage 3 is intended to last two months,
ending with the move to git
<https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2019-10/msg00143.html>
<https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2019-11/msg00117.html>, and given that it
didn't start at the start of November as anticipated in the originally
proposed timetable, that implies corresponding updates to all the dates.
By now, enough people are away until the new year that now isn't a good
time for deciding things anyway.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com