This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: yacc/bison build errors on current CVS


> > 	Since the material quoted  below does not give any details on
> >  the error messages encountered, it is hard to say for sure.  But Flex
> >  changed its interface from 2.5.4a -> 2.5.27, and then changed it
> >  again between 2.5.27 and 2.5.31.

An incompatible change ought to require a jump in version number to
3.0.  This is a very poor choice by the flex maintainers.

> 	These changes require source changes in lex input files.  The
>  new direction flex is taking is to incorporate new functionality at
>  the expense of POSIX or backward compatibility.

In my opinion, moving away from default POSIX compatibility would be
an extremely bad idea.

I don't know if both these claims are true.  But if they are, I think
we need different maintainers for flex.

Ian


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]