This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Patch for Bug No-8081


"Sitikant Sahu, Noida" <sitikants@noida.hcltech.com> writes:

>>However, I think there's still a problem here - there wasn't anything
>>wrong with the code you replaced, it was just being run in the wrong
>>set of circumstances.  What the old comment is trying to say is, "This
>>block of code only works for fixed size structure types.  This is fine
>>because we can't ever get here with a variable sized type because our
>>caller should have given us a target."  Which, it turns out, is not 
>>true.
...
>
>    Actually, when the size of the structure is fixed, it also doesn't flow
> through the old code either.In that case it flows through another path.The
> old code here will be like a dead code.So I believe it is better not to have
> the old code at this position. 

That surprises me.  You did the right thing in that case - but I think
a bit of historical investigation is in order, to find out what that
code was intended to do and why it's there.  Could you do that please?

zw

p.s.  Do you have a copyright assignment on file with the FSF?  We
can't take your patch until you do.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]