This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: Patch for Bug No-8081


Gabriel Dos Reis wrote,

| >  int *p = &func().val[i];
| 
| >Bleah ill-thought-out extensions...
| 
| Here the C parser takes care of semantics and emits the error.  

>Why an error?


while compiling the above statement in gcc 2.96, I get this.
x.c:15: invalid use of non-lvalue array

while compiling the above statement in gcc 3.3, I get this.
x.c:15: error: invalid operands to binary +

These are also the error messages where the return type is not variable
size.  
Is it the desired behaviour?

Regards
Sitikant Sahu



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]