This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] g95 SEGV building libgfortran
- From: law at redhat dot com
- To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Paul Brook <paul at nowt dot org>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 14:54:20 -0600
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] g95 SEGV building libgfortran
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
In message <1062707481.3567.165.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com>, Diego Novillo
writes:
>On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 16:27, law@redhat.com wrote:
>
>> It's easy enough to add code to call the gimplifier in
>> gfc_generate_function_code, but I'm wondering if that's really the right
>> thing to do (ie, is there some reason why you do not call
>> gimplify_function_tree -- are you assuming that it's called from somewhere
>> in the generic parts of the compiler?)
>>
>I was under the impression that f95 generated GIMPLE directly.
Well, then it really shouldn't be generating LOOP_EXPRs anymore, should it? :-)
jeff