This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] g95 SEGV building libgfortran
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Paul Brook <paul at nowt dot org>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 16:31:21 -0400
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] g95 SEGV building libgfortran
- Organization: Red Hat Canada
- References: <200309042027.h84KRsGg016814@speedy.slc.redhat.com>
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 16:27, law@redhat.com wrote:
> It's easy enough to add code to call the gimplifier in
> gfc_generate_function_code, but I'm wondering if that's really the right
> thing to do (ie, is there some reason why you do not call
> gimplify_function_tree -- are you assuming that it's called from somewhere
> in the generic parts of the compiler?)
>
I was under the impression that f95 generated GIMPLE directly.
Diego.