Re: [unit-at-a-time] Java inlining woes

[Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>]

> On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Andrew Haley wrote:
> >  > I may still abandon this for 3.4 and wait for tree-ssa, where it is
> >  > far simpler.  Functions are lowered to GIMPLE before they are
> >  > inlined or even analyzed by cgraphunit, so on tree-ssa making
> >  > unit-at-a-time work for any frontend should be good enough for all.
> >
> > That's exactly my plan.
> 
> I discovered a workaround for my problem, and finished working on it.
> 
> My latest patch would improve java inlining for 3.4 along with fixing
> some important bugs.  If it gets checked in, unit-at-a-time will show up
> on tree-ssa anyway as a side effect of the next merge.

Thats really great :)  Where is the patch? (even when I can't approve
it, I am curious), are there still some of cgraph*.* patches needed (I
can approve that bit)
> 
> Hopefully someone finds it useful since it was a considerable debugging
> effort.  (I sure won't miss the old tree inliner when it's gone.)

Yeahh, the C++ bits were also a lot more messier than I hoped them to be
(and I expected them to be dificult, but not to worth month of
bugfixing). Hope you didn't have that much of fun :)

Thank you a lot for your effort!
Honza
> 
> Jeff