This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 10:10, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 28 Aug 2002 14:13:12 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Jason Merrill <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > | Does anyone object to using TREE_COMPLEXITY for source position in all
> > | expressions (i.e. things which have TREE_COMPLEXITY, not *_DECL, *_CST)?
> > Sorry, I'm unclear here. We already have DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION to
> > indicate source location for _DECLs. Would you mind elaborating a bit
> > on your idea?
> Yes, but that only applies to _DECLs. We need source location info for
> other expressions, too, if we're going to have useful debugging info. I'm
> suggesting that we use TREE_COMPLEXITY for this purpose.
Minor nit. We would be renaming the accessor to something more
intuitive than TREE_COMPLEXITY, right?