This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 28 Aug 2002 14:13:12 +0200
Subject: Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation
Organization: Integrable Solutions
References: <wvllm86k1m1.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com> <wvl65y1px1j.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com> <20020823200122.GF7880@daikokuya.co.uk> <wvl4rdf439u.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com>

Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> writes:

Hi,

| Does anyone object to using TREE_COMPLEXITY for source position in all
| expressions (i.e. things which have TREE_COMPLEXITY, not *_DECL, *_CST)?

Sorry, I'm unclear here.  We already have DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION to
indicate source location for _DECLs.  Would you mind elaborating a bit
on your idea?

Thanks,

-- Gaby

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation
  - From: Jason Merrill

References:
- Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]