This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Bugzilla: Go! (was: Status of Bugzilla?)

On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 09:44:19PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 02:21:08AM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> >On Sat, 30 Mar 2002, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> >>That still holds.  Daniel, how do you want to proceed?  (For access and
> >>technical details I suggest to take these to,
> >>where all root folks of (including myself) are present.)
> >
> >Did any of the other projects on the machine that were also considering
> >Bugzilla (e.g.  GDB) also decide to switch to Bugzilla?
> I believe that gdb was waiting to see what would happen with gcc.

Yes, that's right.  Once bugzilla is in place, my impression was that
the GDB developers would like to take advantage of it.  Binutils
doesn't appear to use GNATS at present; someone should suggest that
they play with bugzilla also.

> I don't have a lot of time these days but I'll offer whatever assistance
> I can to get bugzilla working on  I hope that we can do
> this while keeping in mind that this would be useful for gdb and all of
> the other projects at, too.

Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]