This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Branching for GCC 3.0
Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Joseph> * Which open bugs need to be fixed? (i.e., what will
> Joseph> be happening in the way of cleaning up the fairly
> Joseph> meaningless priorities in GNATS so that the PRs marked
> Joseph> "high" are those considered release critical?)
>
> We will need volunteers for that. Once we branch, this will become
> one of the next major tasks. Together with the functional
> requirements (largely met at this time), we will use the open bugs to
> drive the robustness of the release. That will be the major metric of
> when we are "done enough".
You mean the ratio of analyzed high priority to closed high priority bugs.
When going through the C++ bugs, I've refrained from prioritizing them
when setting them to analyzed. Though I did mark two as high priority
- not that it's actually sped up me getting to them!
nathan
--
Dr Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org