This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: new edge coverage profiler on gcc 3.3
> Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> >It is complete and it should produce .da files.
> >Does the program crash at the end? There seems to be common collision
> >with the routines in glibc handling of profiler format.
> do you think we should rename those routines for 3.3?
>
> (Separately) I think we should break them out of libgcc into a libgcov,
> so that they work with a shared link of libgcc. We can have a spec which
> turns -fcoverage into -lgcov. This is appropriate for 3.4, but is it
> too for 3.3?
I hope so.
>
> Oh, yes. Does your recent change to use the mangled name for functions
> require tweaks in the stuff I did on b-i-b?
Hope it will merge easilly.
Honza
>
> nathan
>
> --
> Dr Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
> 'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
> nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org
>