This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: new edge coverage profiler on gcc 3.3
- From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- Cc: Qiong Cai <qiongc at cse dot unsw dot edu dot au>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 14:46:15 +0100
- Subject: Re: new edge coverage profiler on gcc 3.3
- Organization: Codesourcery LLC
- References: <3DA9280F.9070601@cse.unsw.edu.au> <20021013181921.GG6766@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
Jan Hubicka wrote:
It is complete and it should produce .da files.
Does the program crash at the end? There seems to be common collision
with the routines in glibc handling of profiler format.
do you think we should rename those routines for 3.3?
(Separately) I think we should break them out of libgcc into a libgcov,
so that they work with a shared link of libgcc. We can have a spec which
turns -fcoverage into -lgcov. This is appropriate for 3.4, but is it
too for 3.3?
Oh, yes. Does your recent change to use the mangled name for functions
require tweaks in the stuff I did on b-i-b?
nathan
--
Dr Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org