gcc archive
author index for October, 2002

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

1goodpick

• 2002-10-31 09:34 Big Stock News!!

=?big5?B?U2FtdWVsIENoZW4os6+w0buoKQ==?=

• 2002-10-01 04:51 How to learn linux device driver

=?gb2312?q?kong=20sun?=

• 2002-10-28 04:43 what does this word mean?

=?gb2312?q?zhongda=20lu?=

• 2002-10-03 08:06 [tree-ssa-branch] I s the cfg suit to my work ?
• 2002-10-06 00:51 [tree-ssa-branch] Can I utilize the CFG?
• 2002-10-06 00:51 [tree-ssa-branch] Can I utilize the CFG?

A颿ha & Didier Rizzotti

• 2002-10-28 07:41 Operator overloading problem

Christian J鰊sson

• 2002-10-11 05:22 Re: libstdc++ related bootstrap failures
• 2002-10-13 07:39 Problme building gcc cvs trunk on sparc64-linux: gcc/real.h:67: error: size of array `test_real_width' is negative
• 2002-10-14 01:14 Re: Problme building gcc cvs trunk on sparc64-linux: gcc/real.h:67: error: size of array `test_real_width' is negative
• 2002-10-15 11:19 Failure to bootstrap gcc 20021015 cvs trunk on cygwin: SIGSEGV gengtype.c:376: rtx_next[i] = -1;
• 2002-10-21 12:35 How do I run dejagnu's runtest with other timeout value for specific tests in gcc's testsuite?
• 2002-10-22 11:36 RE: How do I run dejagnu's runtest with other timeout value for specific tests in gcc's testsuite?
• 2002-10-22 23:24 Re: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-23 00:03 How do you configure & build gcc on biarch?
• 2002-10-24 06:37 Failure to bootstrap gcc 20021024 cvs trunk for sparc64-linux: gcc/real.h:67: error: size of array `test_real_width' is negative
• 2002-10-28 02:16 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc 20021024 cvs trunk for sparc64-linux: gcc/real.h:67: error: size of array `test_real_width' is negative

Erwin Ingris

• 2002-10-28 21:39 Re:CSE failing for SH due to weak alias analysis

Gr間oire Dooms

• 2002-10-22 06:03 porting gcc

Luis Gon鏰lves

• 2002-10-29 13:51 How I know which modules from a givem library one program has?

Mattias Engdeg錼d

• 2002-10-15 04:29 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)

Pierre Mallard

• 2002-10-09 06:41 divmod , signed division problem in rtl
• 2002-10-14 07:17 divmod , division+modulo problem in rtl
• 2002-10-16 05:01 Re: divmod , division+modulo problem in rtl
• 2002-10-16 05:01 Re: divmod , division+modulo problem in rtl
• 2002-10-16 05:32 Char as long as one Word , Int twice a Word
• 2002-10-21 00:56 splitting addhi, addsi
• 2002-10-21 00:56 splitting addhi, addsi
• 2002-10-21 07:37 Re: splitting addhi, addsi
• 2002-10-21 07:37 Re: splitting addhi, addsi
• 2002-10-29 03:50 reload reg
• 2002-10-30 08:46 Using SCRATCH Register for a mov op,

Pop S閎astian

• 2002-10-08 12:38 Re: Bug tracking / Release Quality Assurance
• 2002-10-13 06:38 Re: reading the gcc-IR in back-end
• 2002-10-16 13:16 Re: Loop dependence analysis!!
• 2002-10-19 02:52 Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse
• 2002-10-19 12:01 Re: query about back-end issues
• 2002-10-19 13:40 Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse
• 2002-10-19 14:51 Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse
• 2002-10-19 21:33 Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse
• 2002-10-20 01:23 Compilation speed and builtin functions

Rodrigo Oliveira

• 2002-10-21 12:02 Fortran Vs. C (g77 vs GCC) for numerical analyses
• 2002-10-22 20:12 gcc and g77

sushil page

• 2002-10-15 06:43 how to get value of real constant in .tu file
• 2002-10-19 09:46 query about back-end issues

thomas joseph

• 2002-10-24 02:56 exporting symbols in shared libraries

tom potts

• 2002-10-01 05:54 very old versions of GCC...

=?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==?=

• 2002-10-03 11:44 Re: deprecate i960 now?

Aaron Lehmann

• 2002-10-13 13:45 Successful bootstrap of gcc-3.2 (C, C++, ObjC, F77) on s390-ibm-linux

Aaron Williams

• 2002-10-11 23:50 GCC 3.2 issues on Solaris

Adam Sulmicki

• 2002-10-25 13:05 8086 target generation

adelina3@gnet.com

• 2002-10-25 22:09 NO CC ANON oXoXoXo4U

akhilesh maewal

• 2002-10-14 12:56 gcc page

Akim Demaille

• 2002-10-14 02:00 Re: gcc-3_2-branch bootstrap failure when using bison-1.50
• 2002-10-14 02:08 Re: gcc-3_2-branch bootstrap failure when using bison-1.50

Alaeddin A. Aydiner

• 2002-10-02 13:52 Ultrasparc-III+ performance of GCC 3.1

Alan Modra

• 2002-10-03 19:54 xfail gcc.dg test
• 2002-10-03 23:23 Re: xfail gcc.dg test
• 2002-10-04 07:21 Re: xfail gcc.dg test
• 2002-10-04 07:52 libgcc2 __fixsfdi
• 2002-10-04 08:32 Re: xfail gcc.dg test
• 2002-10-04 19:13 Re: xfail gcc.dg test
• 2002-10-05 04:00 Re: xfail gcc.dg test
• 2002-10-05 21:03 Re: xfail gcc.dg test
• 2002-10-08 00:42 Re: libgcc2 __fixsfdi
• 2002-10-21 19:49 Re: .init_array/.fini_array
• 2002-10-22 01:01 Re: .init_array/.fini_array

Aldy Hernandez

• 2002-10-02 19:44 fabs(-0.0) and soft-float
• 2002-10-02 20:30 Re: RFAdvice - a couple of old lost Altivec patches
• 2002-10-02 21:29 Re: fabs(-0.0) and soft-float
• 2002-10-02 21:54 Re: fabs(-0.0) and soft-float
• 2002-10-07 16:11 ppc glibc 2.3 failure
• 2002-10-07 16:42 Re: ppc glibc 2.3 failure
• 2002-10-08 16:48 Re: ppc glibc 2.3 failure
• 2002-10-10 22:27 Re: 2 new regression on darwin6.1
• 2002-10-11 10:20 Re: 2 new regression on darwin6.1
• 2002-10-12 13:03 Re: regression in simd-4.c on darwin6.1
• 2002-10-13 18:22 Re: Does 'make install' changes xgcc?
• 2002-10-17 22:18 ia64 linux doesn't bootstrap
• 2002-10-18 09:49 Re: ia64 linux doesn't bootstrap
• 2002-10-20 19:09 Re: How is generic SIMD support supposed to work?
• 2002-10-31 10:54 Re: Status of SSE builtins

Alexander Bussman

• 2002-10-28 05:30 g++ 3.2 bug?

Alexander Kabaev

• 2002-10-04 10:51 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?

Alexandre Oliva

• 2002-10-01 13:58 Re: module level flags
• 2002-10-01 14:02 Re: module level flags
• 2002-10-02 13:09 Re: Exhaustive simulator testing
• 2002-10-02 22:46 Re: fabs(-0.0) and soft-float
• 2002-10-04 15:54 Re: Help needed
• 2002-10-04 16:00 Re: Missing warning?
• 2002-10-04 16:06 Re: Ada
• 2002-10-05 05:56 mips-linux-gnu doesn't use SIZE_TYPE/PTRDIFF_TYPE from mips.h
• 2002-10-07 12:28 Re: Code Optimization
• 2002-10-08 15:52 Re: gcc.gnu.org: web server config problem
• 2002-10-11 21:23 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)
• 2002-10-13 15:49 Re: memcpy and memcmp
• 2002-10-14 09:19 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-14 10:43 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-14 10:58 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-14 12:37 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-14 13:21 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-14 14:06 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-14 22:00 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-14 22:01 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-15 07:28 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-15 07:47 Re: gcc 3.2.1 draft release notes, 3rd draft
• 2002-10-15 07:54 Re: FW: gcc-3.2 installation
• 2002-10-15 14:49 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-15 17:17 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-16 06:39 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work

Allan Sandfeld Jensen

• 2002-10-09 02:00 Re: 3.2.1 draft release note (second draft)

Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci

• 2002-10-30 10:46 Re: Opening archive files

Andrea \"Fyre Wyzard\" Bocci

• 2002-10-28 09:12 Re: Operator overloading problem

Andrea Bocci

• 2002-10-23 06:07 Re: question about gcc
• 2002-10-28 05:08 Re: what does this word mean?

Andreas Jaeger

• 2002-10-01 21:28 Testing with multilibs?
• 2002-10-02 04:58 Re: Testing with multilibs?
• 2002-10-04 07:21 Current GCC Trees (mainline+3.2) are broken with C++
• 2002-10-04 09:14 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-04 10:23 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-04 10:47 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-05 01:33 Re: gcc-3.2 with glibc-2.3 compile problem
• 2002-10-05 02:54 Re: Does gcc 3.2 branch bootstrap on RedHat 7.3?
• 2002-10-05 06:26 Handling of inlining broken in mainline
• 2002-10-05 13:03 Re: Does gcc 3.2 branch bootstrap on RedHat 7.3?
• 2002-10-05 13:21 Re: Handling of inlining broken in mainline
• 2002-10-06 08:25 Why C++ tests in C testsuite?
• 2002-10-06 08:38 Re: Why C++ tests in C testsuite?
• 2002-10-06 21:49 Reverting Mark's cp patch (Was: Re: [basic-improvements] bootstrapfailure on x86)
• 2002-10-15 00:12 Usable flags for tree-ssa-branch?
• 2002-10-15 23:57 Re: Loop dependence analysis!!
• 2002-10-16 11:42 Re: Loop dependence analysis!!
• 2002-10-22 07:23 PR 7306 (C++/i86 thunk bug with varargs)
• 2002-10-22 11:04 Re: PR 7306 (C++/i86 thunk bug with varargs)
• 2002-10-23 23:11 Re: Simple code produces ICE in gcc-3.2.1
• 2002-10-25 07:27 Re: c/7464: weak symbols alias definitions are broken in 3.1.1(weak alias regression from 2.95)
• 2002-10-26 01:11 Ada bootstrap fails on CVS mainline
• 2002-10-26 21:50 Re: Ada bootstrap fails on CVS mainline
• 2002-10-27 01:52 Re: Ada bootstrap fails on CVS mainline
• 2002-10-28 12:00 Re: [basic-improvements] Merge from trunk

Andreas Schwab

• 2002-10-08 07:28 Re: Variable-sized types vs. templates
• 2002-10-17 07:40 Re: gcc strcpy pseudo bug or detail
• 2002-10-17 07:55 Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse
• 2002-10-18 06:23 Re: ia64 linux doesn't bootstrap
• 2002-10-19 12:26 Re: ia64 linux doesn't bootstrap
• 2002-10-22 11:18 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-23 02:30 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-28 10:31 Re: Problems with message translations (was: c++/7765)

Andreas Tobler

• 2002-10-05 02:50 Re: Does gcc 3.2 branch bootstrap on RedHat 7.3?
• 2002-10-10 13:18 2 new regression on darwin6.1
• 2002-10-10 22:41 Re: 2 new regression on darwin6.1
• 2002-10-11 06:47 regression in simd-4.c on darwin6.1
• 2002-10-11 07:16 Re: 2 new regression on darwin6.1
• 2002-10-13 02:07 Re: regression in simd-4.c on darwin6.1
• 2002-10-15 08:12 cvs problems?
• 2002-10-19 07:30 bootstrap failure on darwin6.1
• 2002-10-21 11:54 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin6.1
• 2002-10-22 23:26 two new failures on darwin6.1 fastmath-1.c

Andrew Haley

• 2002-10-08 02:23 Approval question
• 2002-10-08 03:02 OpenWatcom compiler source code is available now
• 2002-10-08 11:48 soft-float support
• 2002-10-10 08:01 gcc-3.2 build problem in the java area
• 2002-10-11 05:20 Why eh_frame sections in libgcc.a?
• 2002-10-11 10:01 Re: gcc-3.2 build problem in the java area
• 2002-10-11 11:00 Re: gcc-3.2 build problem in the java area
• 2002-10-11 11:19 Re: gcc-3.2 build problem in the java area
• 2002-10-14 03:54 load multiple
• 2002-10-16 08:11 Re: real.c fails floating point tests
• 2002-10-22 01:53 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-22 03:14 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-22 03:48 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-22 03:56 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-22 08:50 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-22 09:05 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-22 12:08 porting gcc
• 2002-10-23 04:49 Re: porting gcc

Andrew Pinski

• 2002-10-04 18:17 Re: in memorial to the autobuild regression checker
• 2002-10-21 17:39 Re: help on adding new insns like min/max
• 2002-10-21 18:11 Re: help on adding new insns like min/max
• 2002-10-22 23:58 Re: two new failures on darwin6.1 fastmath-1.c
• 2002-10-23 18:19 Re: question about gcc
• 2002-10-23 22:15 Re: Simple code produces ICE in gcc-3.2.1
• 2002-10-27 10:36 Re: Statement incorrect in doc
• 2002-10-28 21:38 Re: Status of new graph-coloring register allocator?
• 2002-10-28 23:24 Re: Web page http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2001-03/msg00764.html
• 2002-10-31 12:48 Re: compile/simd-* test failures

Andris Pavenis

• 2002-10-18 00:06 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?

ANTHONY KONU

• 2002-10-21 15:12 please call me
• 2002-10-21 15:12 please call me

Anton Grigoriev

• 2002-10-29 07:07 gcc-3.2 on Mac OS X 10.1.3

Anuradha Vaidyanathan

• 2002-10-30 12:19 pre-compiled gcc 295 rpm?

Arena-Watch

• 2002-10-03 22:32 New High Performance Rink System Installed In Washington State
• 2002-10-03 22:33 New High Performance Rink System Installed In Washington State
• 2002-10-14 08:30 Arena-Watch@thenhl.com Announces New Rink/Arena Design & Product Web Site
• 2002-10-14 08:31 Arena-Watch@thenhl.com Announces New Rink/Arena Design & Product Web Site

Arnaud Charlet

• 2002-10-18 09:10 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?

Avinash J.K. Shrivastava

• 2002-10-02 11:20 query about Gcc-backend..

Avinash K. Shrivastava

• 2002-10-03 13:18 About Gcc...front end..
• 2002-10-11 10:48 gcc-backend query..
• 2002-10-13 02:27 reading the gcc-IR in back-end
• 2002-10-13 02:27 reading the gcc-IR in back-end
• 2002-10-15 11:04 "xgcc"-file
• 2002-10-24 00:04 Gcc-backend files,
• 2002-10-25 04:21 tree-lang
• 2002-10-31 11:58 (.tu) file....

bemis

• 2002-10-22 11:11 Re: GCC regression testing

Ben Elliston

• 2002-10-08 19:30 Re: Testsuite reorganization, documentation, cleanup?
• 2002-10-16 15:36 Re: Multilib User Libraries
• 2002-10-18 04:52 Re: Exhaustive simulator testing
• 2002-10-21 22:13 Re: How do I run dejagnu's runtest with other timeout value for specific tests in gcc's testsuite?
• 2002-10-22 00:51 GCC regression testing
• 2002-10-22 13:35 Re: GCC regression testing
• 2002-10-24 21:22 Re: Simple code produces ICE in gcc-3.2.1

Benjamin Kosnik

• 2002-10-04 17:01 in memorial to the autobuild regression checker
• 2002-10-09 13:30 Re: basic_string linking related problem
• 2002-10-11 10:02 Re: libstdc++ related bootstrap failures
• 2002-10-11 11:41 Re: V3 vs. symbol versions
• 2002-10-11 11:49 Re: Questions how to test correct c++ library install.
• 2002-10-11 14:15 Re: libstdc++ related bootstrap failures
• 2002-10-15 11:44 Re: PR 8134: C++ crash
• 2002-10-22 14:15 Re: GCC regression testing
• 2002-10-24 15:48 Re: GCC 3.2.1 -- Request for Bug Fixers

benjaminkuester

• 2002-10-02 16:17 -msse, -mmmx and other "-m"-Options impossible?

Bernd Trog

• 2002-10-15 03:50 Language-platform marix
• 2002-10-17 13:02 Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-17 14:22 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-17 15:21 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-17 15:48 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-18 04:48 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-18 04:53 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-18 12:49 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-18 12:53 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-18 13:01 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?

bestsockerplayer

• 2002-10-15 05:35 Thank you again fro tom!
• 2002-10-15 05:35 Thank you again fro tom!

Bo Thorsen

• 2002-10-01 03:08 Multilib libjava problem
• 2002-10-01 07:58 Libtool problem (Was: Multilib libjava problem)
• 2002-10-01 11:30 Re: Libtool problem (Was: Multilib libjava problem)

Bobby McNulty Junior

• 2002-10-04 13:47 Ada
• 2002-10-04 16:13 RE: Ada

BONNER,MATT (HP-Vancouver,ex1)

• 2002-10-04 16:53 3.2 and 3.3 release questions
• 2002-10-07 13:33 RE: 3.2 and 3.3 release questions

Bonzini

• 2002-10-28 11:14 [i386] memcmp very slow
• 2002-10-29 12:58 Re: [RFC] i386 memcmp implementation and gcc builtin

Brad Lucier

• 2002-10-04 18:38 New, earlier, mainline bootstrap failure on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8
• 2002-10-10 12:05 subversions.gnu.org not being updated
• 2002-10-10 12:49 Re: subversions.gnu.org not being updated (fwd)
• 2002-10-17 12:01 real.c implementation
• 2002-10-18 11:02 Re: real.c fails floating-point tests
• 2002-10-18 15:25 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-18 19:01 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-20 15:09 Re: abysmal code generated by gcc-3.2
• 2002-10-20 20:00 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-22 15:14 Re: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-25 19:36 Re: real.c implementation

Brajesh

• 2002-10-03 23:38 Help needed

brent.baus

• 2002-10-04 16:14 Four to 18 qualified sales leads everyday!

Brett Smith

• 2002-10-15 13:10 [info@fsf.org: GCC bounds checking]

Brigitte Verdonk

• 2002-10-28 08:31 Re: real.c implementation

Bruce Korb

• 2002-10-01 12:16 Re: module level flags

Chaitu

• 2002-10-08 05:37 profiling on AIX

Charles Hixson

• 2002-10-24 15:30 gcc, gcj, & compilation

Charles Y. Kim

• 2002-10-14 15:37 Throw/Catch not working in SO?
• 2002-10-14 17:21 RE: Throw/Catch not working in SO?

cheyenneje@gnet.com

• 2002-10-30 20:41 xBASICALLYxHOTx

Christian Rimpau

• 2002-10-25 06:19 short question

Christian Westgaard

• 2002-10-16 05:43 gcc-3.2 bootstrap

Christopher Faylor

• 2002-10-08 18:11 Re: Any problem with CVS repositry?
• 2002-10-08 23:08 Re: Bug reporting [Was: Re: [PATCH] change gnats.html to fix web/8168]
• 2002-10-09 19:20 Re: Any problem with CVS repositry?

Contra

• 2002-10-01 16:07 This is truly amazing !!

Corentin BARON

• 2002-10-15 09:02 compiling gnat on osx

cyan

• 2002-10-10 07:55 gcc-3.2 build problem in the java area
• 2002-10-10 08:10 Re: gcc-3.2 build problem in the java area

D. Adamian

• 2002-10-21 08:26 An ask for documentation of trees

D.Venkatasubramanian, Noida

• 2002-10-03 06:26 [PATCH] for gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20020411-1.c
• 2002-10-04 00:09 [PATCH] for gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20020219-1.c
• 2002-10-09 01:40 RE: [PATCH] for gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20020219-1.c
• 2002-10-09 23:59 RE: [PATCH] for gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20020219-1.c

Dale Johannesen

• 2002-10-02 15:39 Re: RFAdvice - a couple of old lost Altivec patches
• 2002-10-03 10:07 Re: RFAdvice - a couple of old lost Altivec patches
• 2002-10-07 16:37 Re: ppc glibc 2.3 failure
• 2002-10-07 16:52 Re: ppc glibc 2.3 failure
• 2002-10-07 18:09 Re: ppc glibc 2.3 failure
• 2002-10-08 17:14 Re: ppc glibc 2.3 failure
• 2002-10-14 09:35 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)
• 2002-10-14 10:25 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-15 18:03 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)
• 2002-10-16 09:47 Re: Problems building GNAT on OS X with top-of-tree
• 2002-10-16 10:12 Re: Problems building GNAT on OS X with top-of-tree
• 2002-10-16 10:47 Re: Problems building GNAT on OS X with top-of-tree
• 2002-10-16 13:58 Re: Problems building GNAT on OS X with top-of-tree
• 2002-10-17 13:53 Re: Problems building GNAT on OS X with top-of-tree
• 2002-10-17 14:11 Re: Problems building GNAT on OS X with top-of-tree
• 2002-10-17 14:52 Re: Problems building GNAT on OS X with top-of-tree
• 2002-10-21 12:32 Re: abysmal code generated by gcc 3.2
• 2002-10-21 15:11 Re: help on adding new insns like min/max
• 2002-10-21 16:13 Re: help on adding new insns like min/max
• 2002-10-21 16:31 Re: Question on insn scheduling and SP
• 2002-10-22 09:56 Re: abysmal code generated by gcc 3.2
• 2002-10-23 10:05 Re: two new failures on darwin6.1 fastmath-1.c

damovand

• 2002-10-11 06:27 Questions how to test correct c++ library install.
• 2002-10-11 12:26 What to do about already reported bugs
• 2002-10-11 13:20 Re: What to do about already reported bugs

Dan Towner

• 2002-10-09 01:38 DSP-C
• 2002-10-15 06:10 Multilib User Libraries
• 2002-10-21 06:59 DFA Scheduling Queries
• 2002-10-31 01:51 Incorrect DFA scheduling of inline assembly
• 2002-10-31 09:55 Using get_attr_type in final_prescan_insn

Daniel Berlin

• 2002-10-02 06:36 Re: gcc-specific array operator in C
• 2002-10-02 21:33 Re: RFAdvice - a couple of old lost Altivec patches
• 2002-10-03 12:26 Re: Register Allocation Algorithm..
• 2002-10-04 17:17 Re: Register Allocation Algorithm..
• 2002-10-08 22:04 Re: Bug reporting [Was: Re: [PATCH] change gnats.html to fix web/8168]
• 2002-10-16 21:16 Re: GNATS
• 2002-10-21 20:41 Getting access to anonymous_namespace_name in dwarf2out.c
• 2002-10-29 08:45 Re: Status of new graph-coloring register allocator?

Daniel Jacobowitz

• 2002-10-02 08:46 Re: pointers are not permitted as case values
• 2002-10-11 06:32 Re: dependency analyzer vs. drawf
• 2002-10-11 06:40 Re: dependency analyzer vs. drawf
• 2002-10-15 13:04 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-15 14:06 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-16 10:26 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)
• 2002-10-24 09:21 Re: 3.2 branch/openserver g++ test results looking bad
• 2002-10-28 10:43 Re: basic-block profiling
• 2002-10-28 16:12 Re: Build Issues!
• 2002-10-31 12:45 Re: release status and optimization/8334

Dannis 't Hart

• 2002-10-23 15:53 Succesfully built gcc-3.2 (c, c++, f77) on powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0

darrent2@rahis.com

• 2002-10-25 22:08 Hiya!!

David Carlton

• 2002-10-24 12:41 Re: Getting access to anonymous_namespace_name in dwarf2out.c
• 2002-10-30 12:44 Re: Improved use of TREE_SYMBOL_REFERENCED in the C++ front end

David Edelsohn

• 2002-10-01 09:46 AIX bootstrap failure
• 2002-10-01 10:45 Re: AIX bootstrap failure
• 2002-10-01 12:56 Re: AIX bootstrap failure
• 2002-10-01 16:03 Re: AIX bootstrap failure
• 2002-10-02 08:14 Re: glibc-2.2.5 bug triggered by Java interpreter
• 2002-10-04 07:17 Re: xfail gcc.dg test
• 2002-10-04 07:24 Re: xfail gcc.dg test
• 2002-10-04 08:11 Re: xfail gcc.dg test
• 2002-10-04 11:33 Re: xfail gcc.dg test
• 2002-10-04 18:57 Re: Register Allocation Algorithm..
• 2002-10-04 19:24 Re: xfail gcc.dg test
• 2002-10-07 14:10 Re: 3.1/3.2 C++ ABI change
• 2002-10-08 07:31 Re: profiling on AIX
• 2002-10-10 12:15 Re: subversions.gnu.org not being updated
• 2002-10-11 06:57 Re: 2 new regression on darwin6.1
• 2002-10-11 09:32 Re: libstdc++ related bootstrap failures
• 2002-10-11 09:55 Re: libstdc++ related bootstrap failures
• 2002-10-11 10:05 Re: gcc-3.2 build problem in the java area
• 2002-10-11 18:51 Re: regression in simd-4.c on darwin6.1
• 2002-10-14 09:37 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-16 08:10 Re: real.c fails floating point tests
• 2002-10-16 14:35 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-16 15:32 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-18 09:37 Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse
• 2002-10-18 09:48 Re: ia64 linux doesn't bootstrap
• 2002-10-18 13:03 Re: ia64 linux doesn't bootstrap
• 2002-10-18 18:46 Re: It's target deprecation season again!
• 2002-10-18 19:03 Re: ia64 linux doesn't bootstrap
• 2002-10-21 11:46 Re: Your change to expmed.c on 3/13/2002
• 2002-10-21 18:21 Re: ia64 linux doesn't bootstrap
• 2002-10-22 12:34 Re: machine description porting question.
• 2002-10-22 19:23 Re: Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-23 07:57 Re: two new failures on darwin6.1 fastmath-1.c
• 2002-10-23 10:05 Re: Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-25 15:32 Re: GCC 3.2 branch libstdc++ abi_check.cc bootstrap failure on AIX
• 2002-10-25 17:21 Re: GCC 3.2 branch libstdc++ abi_check.cc bootstrap failure on AIX
• 2002-10-25 17:34 Re: GCC 3.2 branch libstdc++ abi_check.cc bootstrap failure on AIX
• 2002-10-28 09:51 Re: High priority bugs status
• 2002-10-29 07:54 Re: Status of new graph-coloring register allocator?
• 2002-10-29 14:49 Re: Status of new graph-coloring register allocator?

David Miller

• 2002-10-28 23:17 Web page http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2001-03/msg00764.html

David O'Brien

• 2002-10-04 08:09 Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-04 08:22 Re: Convergence of GCC - slightly off topic
• 2002-10-04 08:45 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-04 09:29 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-04 09:34 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-04 09:46 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-04 10:02 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-04 13:04 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-04 13:14 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-04 13:21 Re: 3.2.1 draft release notes
• 2002-10-08 18:53 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-09 16:52 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?

David Reid

• 2002-10-07 04:58 GCC 3.2 build problem
• 2002-10-19 04:21 Seeking...
• 2002-10-19 13:18 unknown dynamic entry

David S. Miller

• 2002-10-07 09:18 Re: Bug tracking / Release Quality Assurance
• 2002-10-14 00:11 Re: Problme building gcc cvs trunk on sparc64-linux:gcc/real.h:67: error: size of array `test_real_width' is negative
• 2002-10-14 10:20 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-14 12:42 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-14 12:58 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-21 08:55 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-22 15:51 Re: status of high-priority GNATS bugs

Deepak B. Nayak

• 2002-10-01 07:26 modulo scheduling for IA64
• 2002-10-01 12:36 Re: modulo scheduling for IA64
• 2002-10-02 11:01 if-conv problem....
• 2002-10-02 21:48 Re: if-conv problem....
• 2002-10-02 23:35 Re: if-conv problem....
• 2002-10-11 03:21 running gcc testcases
• 2002-10-11 12:14 Re: running gcc testcases

Denis Chertykov

• 2002-10-22 13:22 Re: porting gcc
• 2002-10-29 09:50 Re: Status of new graph-coloring register allocator?

Dennis Newbold

• 2002-10-24 11:45 Web Page Content Error

Denys Duchier

• 2002-10-20 14:55 abysmal code generated by gcc 3.2
• 2002-10-20 15:49 Re: abysmal code generated by gcc-3.2
• 2002-10-21 02:16 Re: abysmal code generated by gcc 3.2
• 2002-10-21 07:59 Re: abysmal code generated by gcc 3.2
• 2002-10-21 11:38 Re: abysmal code generated by gcc 3.2
• 2002-10-21 16:43 Re: abysmal code generated by gcc 3.2

Devang Patel

• 2002-10-01 16:28 Bootstrap failure: libstdc++ Undefined symbols
• 2002-10-04 14:57 speed benchmark ?
• 2002-10-04 15:20 Re: speed benchmark ?
• 2002-10-04 16:50 Re: speed benchmark ?
• 2002-10-31 14:31 -Wp,<options>
• 2002-10-31 15:45 Re: -Wp,<options>

Diego Novillo

• 2002-10-03 08:19 Re: [tree-ssa-branch] I s the cfg suit to my work ?
• 2002-10-03 09:55 [basic-improvements] bootstrap failure on x86
• 2002-10-04 13:14 Re: [basic-improvements] bootstrap failure on x86
• 2002-10-04 15:02 Re: speed benchmark ?
• 2002-10-06 07:29 Re: [tree-ssa-branch] Can I utilize the CFG?
• 2002-10-06 15:27 Re: [basic-improvements] bootstrap failure on x86
• 2002-10-09 06:43 Re: Need info for tree to rtl conversion
• 2002-10-11 17:03 [tree-ssa] merge with basic-improvements as of 2002-10-11
• 2002-10-15 04:10 Re: Usable flags for tree-ssa-branch?
• 2002-10-16 11:54 Re: Loop dependence analysis!!
• 2002-10-16 13:23 Re: Loop dependence analysis!!
• 2002-10-17 06:51 Re: Improving Alias Analysis
• 2002-10-17 07:40 Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse
• 2002-10-17 13:04 Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse
• 2002-10-17 15:00 Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse
• 2002-10-18 04:22 Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse
• 2002-10-18 04:23 Re: Improving Alias Analysis
• 2002-10-18 08:34 Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse
• 2002-10-20 08:56 Re: Compilation speed and builtin functions
• 2002-10-22 11:35 [tree-ssa] basic-improvements merge as of 2002-10-21
• 2002-10-31 04:06 [basic-improvements] bootstrap failure on x86
• 2002-10-31 12:05 Re: (.tu) file....
• 2002-10-31 12:11 Re: [basic-improvements] bootstrap failure on x86

DJ Delorie

• 2002-10-01 16:48 Re: g++ "loosing" options
• 2002-10-14 13:00 Re: Target ABIs with 16bit ints.
• 2002-10-21 12:59 Re: It's target deprecation season again!
• 2002-10-23 12:46 Re: It's target deprecation season again!
• 2002-10-25 08:21 Re: quickstrap, et al, at the top level?
• 2002-10-25 11:07 Re: quickstrap, et al, at the top level?
• 2002-10-25 13:35 Re: 8086 target generation
• 2002-10-25 15:28 Re: quickstrap, et al, at the top level?
• 2002-10-25 18:19 Re: quickstrap, et al, at the top level?
• 2002-10-25 20:27 Re: quickstrap, et al, at the top level?
• 2002-10-28 11:37 Re: Obsolete installation instructions and inconvenient CVS HOWTO
• 2002-10-28 12:30 Re: time for bug triage?
• 2002-10-28 12:34 Re: RFC: Support for optional library files in specs

Dmitry

• 2002-10-16 02:38 insn generator strange behaviour.
• 2002-10-22 05:54 peephole2 and insn question
• 2002-10-23 02:39 regex and gcc question
• 2002-10-29 03:23 condition codes question

Dominic Sweetman

• 2002-10-15 01:15 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work

Donn Terry

• 2002-10-02 09:59 Bootstrap on MSVC broken (real.c ICEs compiling floatdidf()) .. was RE: Bootstrap still broken on ia64

Douglas B Rupp

• 2002-10-05 00:40 Re: Does anyone actually use GCC on Interix?
• 2002-10-06 09:18 Re: Does anyone actually use GCC on Interix?

Dr. Billy Stewart

• 2002-10-29 13:12 Missing pieces??

dwd22

• 2002-10-30 10:30 Re: Questions about modifing AST.

Ed Vesper

• 2002-10-20 09:19 Steering Comittee Standards/Roles....

Eli Kane

• 2002-10-18 21:53 successful build info

Emch, A Dev

• 2002-10-28 15:57 Build Issues!

emirror-list-admin

• 2002-10-29 19:44 Your message to EMirror-List awaits moderator approval

Eric Botcazou

• 2002-10-25 01:18 Re: Simple code produces ICE in gcc-3.2.1

Eric Christopher

• 2002-10-03 16:34 Re: trying to build cross compiler for powerpc w/x686 host - nocrti.o
• 2002-10-05 23:39 Re: mips-linux-gnu doesn't use SIZE_TYPE/PTRDIFF_TYPE from mips.h
• 2002-10-07 10:36 Re: Trouble with EABI
• 2002-10-08 16:26 Re: Any problem with CVS repositry?
• 2002-10-11 12:36 Re: What to do about already reported bugs
• 2002-10-14 14:29 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-14 18:36 Re: [basic-improvements] Merge from trunk, 2002-10-13
• 2002-10-15 14:02 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-18 18:51 Re: Installing GCC on Mandrake SNF 7.2
• 2002-10-22 18:02 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-22 18:33 [mips-rewrite-branch] merge from b-i-b
• 2002-10-23 15:40 [basic-improvements-branch] corruption somewhere...
• 2002-10-23 15:46 Re: [basic-improvements-branch] corruption somewhere...

Eric Tang

• 2002-10-26 22:10 Questions about modifing AST.
• 2002-10-27 08:20 Re: Questions about modifing AST.

Eric W. Biederman

• 2002-10-12 10:43 streams is slow under gcc

Erik Schnetter

• 2002-10-19 00:52 Re: restrict keyword [was: expalin this syntax pls]

Fantasy \(Fay\)

• 2002-10-13 12:14 http://gcc.gnu.org/install/finalinstall.html

Fergus Henderson

• 2002-10-01 02:05 Re: gcc documentation
• 2002-10-02 20:57 Re: Treelang on GCC 3.2
• 2002-10-04 08:46 Re: xfail gcc.dg test
• 2002-10-05 07:02 Re: Does gcc 3.2 branch bootstrap on RedHat 7.3?
• 2002-10-05 19:01 Re: Does gcc 3.2 branch bootstrap on RedHat 7.3?
• 2002-10-06 08:32 Re: Why C++ tests in C testsuite?
• 2002-10-08 17:54 Re: PR 7765 and internationalization
• 2002-10-13 05:03 Re: Slow/Swappy C++ compilation
• 2002-10-13 05:12 Re: subversions.gnu.org not being updated (fwd)
• 2002-10-14 18:35 Re: beginner development
• 2002-10-14 18:39 Re: Throw/Catch not working in SO?
• 2002-10-15 19:41 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-16 07:08 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)
• 2002-10-20 21:49 Re: abysmal code generated by gcc 3.2
• 2002-10-21 08:40 Re: An ask for documentation of trees
• 2002-10-21 11:50 Re: abysmal code generated by gcc 3.2
• 2002-10-21 20:34 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-24 02:13 Re: Gcc-backend files,
• 2002-10-24 08:09 Re: exporting symbols in shared libraries
• 2002-10-27 00:37 Re: Questions about modifing AST.
• 2002-10-27 17:23 Re: Questions about modifing AST.
• 2002-10-28 18:54 Re: Knowing Whether a function contains inner nested functions.
• 2002-10-28 19:05 Re: Data Type sizes question
• 2002-10-30 20:33 Re: Rename -W to -Wextra ?

Florian Weimer

• 2002-10-06 08:10 Re: Make -pthread the generic Posix-threads option for gcc
• 2002-10-18 08:18 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-18 08:21 Re: [Ada] ASIS support for gcc 3.X versions
• 2002-10-18 09:02 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-18 09:17 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?

Foo Yoong Seng NCS

• 2002-10-15 02:45 FW: gcc-3.2 installation

Franz Sirl

• 2002-10-28 08:34 Re: High priority bugs status
• 2002-10-28 12:43 Re: High priority bugs status

Gabriel Dos Reis

• 2002-10-02 20:00 Re: fabs(-0.0) and soft-float
• 2002-10-02 21:41 Re: fabs(-0.0) and soft-float
• 2002-10-02 22:14 Re: fabs(-0.0) and soft-float
• 2002-10-03 13:19 Re: gnu on solaris
• 2002-10-05 05:05 Re: Make -pthread the generic Posix-threads option for gcc (was: Re: cc1plus errors)
• 2002-10-05 05:06 Re: cc1plus errors
• 2002-10-06 01:02 Re: module level flags
• 2002-10-06 06:09 Re: module level flags
• 2002-10-06 11:53 Re: [basic-improvements] bootstrap failure on x86
• 2002-10-06 12:06 Re: [basic-improvements] bootstrap failure on x86
• 2002-10-07 19:50 Re: Bug tracking / Release Quality Assurance
• 2002-10-08 16:07 PR 7765 and internationalization
• 2002-10-08 16:51 Re: PR 7765 and internationalization
• 2002-10-10 13:06 Re: subversions.gnu.org not being updated
• 2002-10-10 14:22 Re: When to emit the vtable for a class template
• 2002-10-10 14:43 Re: When to emit the vtable for a class template
• 2002-10-15 01:29 Re: quote marks [was: Status of i18n patches]
• 2002-10-15 01:34 Re: quote marks [was: Status of i18n patches]
• 2002-10-15 02:53 Re: iostream question
• 2002-10-15 07:53 Re: gcc 3.2.1 draft release notes, 3rd draft
• 2002-10-15 11:46 Re: PR 8134: C++ crash
• 2002-10-16 07:57 Re: real.c fails floating point tests
• 2002-10-16 08:19 Re: real.c fails floating point tests
• 2002-10-31 16:26 Re: Patch: stab info for const fields

Ganesh Kumar NM

• 2002-10-07 06:42 Problem in configuring the ASN1 Compiler
• 2002-10-07 06:48 Problem in configuring the ASN1 Compiler

gary@nomore-accent.com

• 2002-10-18 05:17 - - - Accent Reduction Products...

gccadmin

• 2002-10-07 17:25 gcc-ss-20021007 is now available
• 2002-10-14 17:38 gcc-ss-20021014 is now available
• 2002-10-21 18:41 gcc-ss-20021021 is now available
• 2002-10-28 17:53 gcc-ss-20021028 is now available

Geert Bosch

• 2002-10-15 09:25 Re: compiling gnat on osx
• 2002-10-15 18:32 Problems building GNAT on OS X with top-of-tree
• 2002-10-16 10:38 Re: Problems building GNAT on OS X with top-of-tree
• 2002-10-16 11:29 Re: Problems building GNAT on OS X with top-of-tree
• 2002-10-16 12:53 Re: Problems building GNAT on OS X with top-of-tree
• 2002-10-17 13:44 Re: Problems building GNAT on OS X with top-of-tree
• 2002-10-17 13:50 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-17 14:49 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-19 11:57 Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse

Geoff Keating

• 2002-10-01 12:03 Re: module level flags
• 2002-10-04 08:02 Re: xfail gcc.dg test
• 2002-10-04 11:27 Re: xfail gcc.dg test
• 2002-10-08 16:36 Re: ppc glibc 2.3 failure
• 2002-10-08 16:45 Re: PR 7765 and internationalization
• 2002-10-14 16:29 Re: regression in simd-4.c on darwin6.1
• 2002-10-15 14:51 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-15 16:37 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-15 16:57 Re: regression in simd-4.c on darwin6.1
• 2002-10-16 12:56 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-21 11:47 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin6.1
• 2002-10-25 16:21 Re: quickstrap, et al, at the top level?
• 2002-10-25 20:13 Re: quickstrap, et al, at the top level?
• 2002-10-26 13:48 Re: Status of i18n patches (again)
• 2002-10-30 16:44 Re: DWARF question/inlining/local classes
• 2002-10-31 11:00 Re: DWARF question/inlining/local classes

Geoffrey Keating

• 2002-10-17 14:38 Re: Problems building GNAT on OS X with top-of-tree
• 2002-10-17 15:22 Re: Problems building GNAT on OS X with top-of-tree

George H

• 2002-10-03 02:41 Re: memrefs_conflict_p () for REGs in alias.c

George Kraft IV

• 2002-10-10 08:47 Standardizing _Unwind_* error handling interfaces found inlibgcc_s.so

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2002-10-01 11:03 Re: Your page http://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html
• 2002-10-04 01:36 Re: Website in XHTML
• 2002-10-04 05:09 PATCH for Re: http://gcc.gnu.org
• 2002-10-04 06:28 PATCH for Re: web page starting to show its age
• 2002-10-04 06:42 PATCH for Re: web page starting to show its age
• 2002-10-04 08:15 Re: Error on the development plan web page?
• 2002-10-04 09:59 Re: PATCH for Re: http://gcc.gnu.org
• 2002-10-04 10:05 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-04 10:06 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-04 10:14 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-04 11:18 Re: gcc logo
• 2002-10-05 03:22 Re: 3.2 and 3.3 release questions
• 2002-10-07 09:03 Bug tracking / Release Quality Assurance
• 2002-10-11 05:04 libstdc++ related bootstrap failures
• 2002-10-11 06:22 Re: How to get GCC manual webpage in one gzip file
• 2002-10-13 23:42 3.2-branch: Missing make dependency?
• 2002-10-14 12:51 RE: 3.2 and 3.3 release questions
• 2002-10-15 14:00 Re: subversions.gnu.org not being updated (fwd)
• 2002-10-15 14:34 Re: C++ slow/swappy problem solved
• 2002-10-16 14:23 Re: GNATS
• 2002-10-18 07:42 Re: Assignment legal documents?
• 2002-10-18 15:21 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/finalinstall.html
• 2002-10-19 05:44 PATCH for Re: VCG or GNUVCG or GVCG or GViz?
• 2002-10-23 05:38 Re: gnats account
• 2002-10-23 08:53 C++ compile-time performance regressions / PR 3083
• 2002-10-24 11:52 Re: Web Page Content Error
• 2002-10-25 13:02 Re: [GCC] removal from web archive of mailing list??? please?
• 2002-10-25 13:41 Re: C++ compile-time performance regressions / PR 3083
• 2002-10-26 03:12 Re: GCC regression testing
• 2002-10-28 05:58 Re: Obsolete installation instructions and inconvenient CVS HOWTO
• 2002-10-28 06:16 Re: Obsolete installation instructions and inconvenient CVS HOWTO
• 2002-10-28 06:43 List of Java Contributors
• 2002-10-29 08:54 Re: Status of SSE builtins
• 2002-10-29 11:17 Re: Status of SSE builtins
• 2002-10-29 11:51 Re: List of Java Contributors
• 2002-10-29 12:16 Re: Status of SSE builtins
• 2002-10-29 13:40 Re: Status of SSE builtins
• 2002-10-30 14:04 Re: PATCH for Re: web page starting to show its age

Giada

• 2002-10-19 01:07 Sesso ma vero...
• 2002-10-19 01:09 Sesso ma vero...

Gold Eagle

• 2002-10-27 06:07 help: why libstdc++.so.5 not found after installed gcc-3.2

Graeme Peterson

• 2002-10-08 11:40 soft-float support
• 2002-10-08 11:57 Re: soft-float support
• 2002-10-08 13:09 Re: soft-float support
• 2002-10-08 14:42 Re: soft-float support

Graham Stott

• 2002-10-01 10:17 Re: AIX bootstrap failure
• 2002-10-08 16:21 Any problem with CVS repositry?
• 2002-10-08 17:24 Re: Any problem with CVS repositry?
• 2002-10-26 03:03 Re: Ada bootstrap fails on CVS mainline
• 2002-10-26 09:05 Re: Ada bootstrap fails on CVS mainline
• 2002-10-26 10:23 Re: Ada bootstrap fails on CVS mainline

H. J. Lu

• 2002-10-01 17:38 Why is srcdir set to `.'?
• 2002-10-02 10:24 The untested Linux binutils 2.13.90.0.6
• 2002-10-02 10:25 Re: The untested Linux binutils 2.13.90.0.6
• 2002-10-03 23:59 Does gcc 3.2 branch bootstrap on RedHat 7.3?
• 2002-10-04 08:23 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-04 08:50 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-04 09:36 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-04 09:47 Re: Does gcc 3.2 branch bootstrap on RedHat 7.3?
• 2002-10-04 09:53 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-04 09:55 Re: Does gcc 3.2 branch bootstrap on RedHat 7.3?
• 2002-10-04 11:29 PATCH: Revert part of c++ change (Re: Does gcc 3.2 branch bootstrap on RedHat 7.3?)
• 2002-10-05 00:06 gcc.c-torture/compile/20020927-1.c without ChangeLog entry?
• 2002-10-11 22:50 The Linux binutils 2.13.90.0.10 is released
• 2002-10-14 08:28 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-14 09:16 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-14 09:23 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-14 10:16 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-14 10:24 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-14 10:25 Re: Subject: Kernel bugs that trip expect (Was: Re: 2 new regression on darwin6.1)
• 2002-10-14 10:50 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-14 11:00 Re: Subject: Kernel bugs that trip expect (Was: Re: 2 new regression on darwin6.1)
• 2002-10-14 11:01 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-14 12:39 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-14 12:55 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-14 13:09 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-14 13:23 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-14 14:14 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-14 17:02 C ABI changes between gcc 2.96 and gcc 3.2?
• 2002-10-14 21:11 Re: C ABI changes between gcc 2.96 and gcc 3.2?
• 2002-10-15 06:11 Re: Subject: Kernel bugs that trip expect (Was: Re: 2 new regression on darwin6.1)
• 2002-10-15 09:34 Re: Subject: Kernel bugs that trip expect (Was: Re: 2 new regression on darwin6.1)
• 2002-10-15 12:25 Re: Subject: Kernel bugs that trip expect (Was: Re: 2 new regression on darwin6.1)
• 2002-10-18 16:36 Re: It's target deprecation season again!
• 2002-10-31 12:34 Re: release status and optimization/8334

H. Peter Anvin

• 2002-10-10 10:30 Re: [lsb-spec] Re: Standardizing _Unwind_* error handling interfacesfound in libgcc_s.so
• 2002-10-10 15:30 Re: [lsb-spec] Re: Standardizing _Unwind_* error handling interfaces found in libgcc_s.so

Hans-Peter Nilsson

• 2002-10-02 19:30 Re: Convergence of GCC - slightly off topic
• 2002-10-03 13:47 Re: gnu on solaris
• 2002-10-04 20:25 Re: cc1plus errors
• 2002-10-04 21:32 Make -pthread the generic Posix-threads option for gcc (was: Re:cc1plus errors)
• 2002-10-07 20:22 Re: Testsuite reorganization, documentation, cleanup?
• 2002-10-08 00:43 Re: Testsuite reorganization, documentation, cleanup?
• 2002-10-19 00:46 Re: It's target deprecation season again!
• 2002-10-19 01:07 Re: It's target deprecation season again!
• 2002-10-25 23:54 MMIX: all but first g++.dg/compat fail; no g++_tg.o. Why?

Hartmut Schirmer

• 2002-10-16 12:06 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)

Hermione Granger

• 2002-10-06 21:41 Linking?
• 2002-10-11 05:37 Linking
• 2002-10-12 11:26 memcpy and memcmp

Hillel (Sabba) Markowitz

• 2002-10-18 10:12 Current release schedule

ibrumm

• 2002-10-23 22:02 linking problem
• 2002-10-24 12:34 Re: linking problem -> filesizes are zero
• 2002-10-26 02:52 -mrelax does not work fully, 8 bit addressing issues
• 2002-10-26 02:57 Re: linking problem solved by using cygwin bzip2 and tar

Igor Shevlyakov

• 2002-10-03 18:07 Advice needed how to avoid generation of extra sign_extends in .md file
• 2002-10-31 11:57 compile/simd-* test failures

Indian Leaders

• 2002-10-15 05:19 Join the Leaders, get 50$ for registration
• 2002-10-16 14:29 Join Leaders, get your clients and money

J. Scott Edwards

• 2002-10-31 07:26 Trouble compiling gcc 3.2 on Linux Playstation 2

J.T. Conklin

• 2002-10-15 10:58 string literals in struct initializers with C++
• 2002-10-15 11:22 Re: new edge coverage profiler on gcc 3.3
• 2002-10-15 12:02 Re: string literals in struct initializers with C++

Jack Howarth

• 2002-10-02 08:42 pointers are not permitted as case values
• 2002-10-11 07:07 Re: 2 new regression on darwin6.1
• 2002-10-19 14:14 bison vs gcc 3.2.1 release
• 2002-10-31 06:28 gcc 3.2.1 schedule?

Jakub Jelinek

• 2002-10-02 08:45 Re: pointers are not permitted as case values
• 2002-10-06 10:05 Re: xfail gcc.dg test
• 2002-10-07 09:26 Re: Bug tracking / Release Quality Assurance
• 2002-10-09 04:08 Re: RH 8.0 build of gcc-3.2
• 2002-10-11 14:09 Re: GCC 3.2 docs in A4 Only?
• 2002-10-16 10:29 Re: fourth draft: gcc 3.2.1 release notes
• 2002-10-24 08:34 Re: Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs

james

• 2002-10-09 01:54 gcc binary for HPUX 10.20 ?

James Brennan

• 2002-10-03 16:29 trying to build cross compiler for powerpc w/x686 host - no crti.o

James Michael DuPont

• 2002-10-15 07:02 XML dumping and GraphViz/VCG in the GCC ast-optimizer-branch
• 2002-10-15 07:24 Re: XML dumping and GraphViz/VCG in the GCC ast-optimizer-branch
• 2002-10-15 09:18 RE: how to get value of real constant in .tu file
• 2002-10-15 09:43 Re: XML dumping and GraphViz/VCG in the GCC ast-optimizer-branch
• 2002-10-15 10:07 Re: XML dumping and GraphViz/VCG in the GCC ast-optimizer-branch
• 2002-10-15 11:06 Re: XML dumping and GraphViz/VCG in the GCC ast-optimizer-branch
• 2002-10-15 22:40 Re: XML dumping and GraphViz/VCG in the GCC ast-optimizer-branch
• 2002-10-19 02:16 VCG or GNUVCG or GVCG or GViz?

Jamie Lokier

• 2002-10-04 17:02 Re: Register Allocation Algorithm..
• 2002-10-04 18:19 Re: Register Allocation Algorithm..
• 2002-10-14 18:38 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)
• 2002-10-15 13:00 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)
• 2002-10-15 14:28 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)
• 2002-10-15 14:37 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)

Jan Bergman

• 2002-10-09 01:46 RH 8.0 build of gcc-3.2

Jan Hubicka

• 2002-10-01 02:08 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-01 04:23 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-01 04:46 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-01 07:02 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-01 07:12 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-01 09:08 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-03 05:07 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-03 05:57 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-03 06:20 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-04 10:25 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-04 10:28 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-04 14:31 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-05 03:09 Re: if-conversion pass....
• 2002-10-13 11:19 Re: new edge coverage profiler on gcc 3.3
• 2002-10-14 08:15 Re: new edge coverage profiler on gcc 3.3
• 2002-10-16 02:31 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-16 02:55 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-20 05:46 How is generic SIMD support supposed to work?
• 2002-10-21 04:41 Re: How is generic SIMD support supposed to work?
• 2002-10-21 15:11 Re: help on adding new insns like min/max
• 2002-10-26 15:39 Re: Ada bootstrap fails on CVS mainline
• 2002-10-29 06:36 Status of SSE builtins
• 2002-10-29 10:24 Re: Status of SSE builtins
• 2002-10-29 11:22 Re: Status of SSE builtins
• 2002-10-29 12:36 Re: Status of SSE builtins
• 2002-10-29 13:48 Re: Status of SSE builtins
• 2002-10-30 13:41 Re: Status of SSE builtins
• 2002-10-30 14:27 Re: Status of SSE builtins
• 2002-10-30 14:39 Re: Status of SSE builtins
• 2002-10-31 00:06 Re: Status of SSE builtins
• 2002-10-31 08:54 Re: Status of SSE builtins
• 2002-10-31 09:18 Re: Status of SSE builtins
• 2002-10-31 15:50 Re: Status of SSE builtins

Jan Vroonhof

• 2002-10-25 03:29 Re: c++/6074 is a regression from 2.95

Jan-Claas Dirks

• 2002-10-24 09:42 gcc 3.2 on SuSE Email Server 3.1

Janis Johnson

• 2002-10-02 14:11 Re: status
• 2002-10-03 10:47 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org
• 2002-10-03 16:46 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org
• 2002-10-04 09:44 Re: Does gcc 3.2 branch bootstrap on RedHat 7.3?
• 2002-10-04 16:15 C++ ABI change since 3.2 with no warning
• 2002-10-08 08:59 Re: Testsuite reorganization, documentation, cleanup?
• 2002-10-14 09:40 Re: Successful bootstrap of gcc-3.2 (C, C++, ObjC, F77) on s390-ibm-linux
• 2002-10-14 09:44 Re: RH 8.0 build of gcc-3.2
• 2002-10-14 17:13 Re: Throw/Catch not working in SO?
• 2002-10-15 09:28 Re: I have a question about gcc version.
• 2002-10-16 09:58 Re: [info@fsf.org: GCC bounds checking]
• 2002-10-16 10:59 Re: gcc-3.2 bootstrap
• 2002-10-17 11:39 Re: Successful build of gcc 3.2 on i686-pc-cygwin on Windows 2000
• 2002-10-18 09:44 Re: ia64 linux doesn't bootstrap
• 2002-10-18 15:34 Re: ia64 linux doesn't bootstrap
• 2002-10-18 20:22 Re: G++ generating unaligned access?
• 2002-10-19 13:51 Re: ia64 linux doesn't bootstrap
• 2002-10-19 13:56 Re: It's target deprecation season again!
• 2002-10-21 09:06 Re: successful build info
• 2002-10-21 10:29 Re: Testsuite reorganization, documentation, cleanup?
• 2002-10-21 16:51 Re: ia64 linux doesn't bootstrap
• 2002-10-22 09:19 Re: GCC regression testing
• 2002-10-22 14:40 Re: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-23 10:05 Re: Which gcc version to test?
• 2002-10-23 10:44 Re: Successful bootstrap of gcc-3.2
• 2002-10-23 15:58 Re: Succesfully built gcc-3.2 (c, c++, f77) on powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0
• 2002-10-23 16:22 Re: Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-24 10:10 Re: Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-24 10:17 Re: gcc 3.2 on SuSE Email Server 3.1
• 2002-10-24 15:52 Re: Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-28 11:34 Re: basic-block profiling
• 2002-10-29 09:47 Re: gcc-3.2 on Mac OS X 10.1.3
• 2002-10-30 13:35 Re: PATCH for Re: web page starting to show its age
• 2002-10-30 14:38 Re: PATCH for Re: web page starting to show its age

Jason Merrill

• 2002-10-04 11:39 Re: GCC Feature question
• 2002-10-04 14:27 Re: GCC Feature question
• 2002-10-08 05:26 Re: Variable-sized types vs. templates
• 2002-10-08 05:47 Re: Variable-sized types vs. templates
• 2002-10-08 06:18 Re: Variable-sized types vs. templates
• 2002-10-10 20:25 Re: Variable-sized types vs. templates
• 2002-10-15 14:56 Re: PR 8134: C++ crash

Jason R Thorpe

• 2002-10-01 22:23 Re: Testing with multilibs?
• 2002-10-17 08:37 G++ generating unaligned access?
• 2002-10-18 16:26 Re: It's target deprecation season again!
• 2002-10-27 21:04 Re: Ada bootstrap fails on CVS mainline
• 2002-10-28 12:08 RFC: Support for optional library files in specs
• 2002-10-29 15:54 Re: RFC: Support for optional library files in specs

jeff

• 2002-10-14 19:13 [Ada] ASIS support for gcc 3.X versions

Jeff Bailey

• 2002-10-11 09:05 Re: subversions.gnu.org not being updated (fwd)

Jeff Law

• 2002-10-02 07:17 Re: Exhaustive simulator testing
• 2002-10-02 07:28 Re: GCC Conference?
• 2002-10-02 07:29 Re: GCC Conference?
• 2002-10-21 08:50 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-21 09:45 Re: GCC floating point usage

Jeff Stuart

• 2002-10-21 17:37 Successful bootstrap of gcc-3.2

Jeff Sturm

• 2002-10-01 12:55 Re: libffi return value convention bug
• 2002-10-02 12:27 Re: Question about gcc 3.2
• 2002-10-02 14:47 Re: Ultrasparc-III+ performance of GCC 3.1
• 2002-10-11 12:12 Re: gcc-3.2 build problem in the java area
• 2002-10-18 13:30 Re: gcc make error

Jiang Alan

• 2002-10-17 06:00 How to compile old GCC version using new GCC version?

Jim Ingham

• 2002-10-11 10:15 Re: 2 new regression on darwin6.1
• 2002-10-14 10:34 Re: Subject: Kernel bugs that trip expect (Was: Re: 2 new regression on darwin6.1)
• 2002-10-15 11:53 Re: Subject: Kernel bugs that trip expect (Was: Re: 2 new regression on darwin6.1)

Jim Wilson

• 2002-10-01 12:29 Re: modulo scheduling for IA64
• 2002-10-02 14:00 Re: if-conv problem....
• 2002-10-02 14:12 Re: query about Gcc-backend..
• 2002-10-03 11:35 Re: Profiling on mips-irix6? (Testcase gcc.dg/nest.c failure)
• 2002-10-03 12:19 Re: Register Allocation Algorithm..
• 2002-10-03 12:52 Re: if-conv problem....
• 2002-10-03 14:03 Re: About Gcc...front end..
• 2002-10-04 09:33 Re: deprecate i960 now?
• 2002-10-04 09:46 Re: deprecate i960 now?
• 2002-10-04 09:51 Re: Advice needed how to avoid generation of extra sign_extends in .md file
• 2002-10-04 12:45 x86 reload bug in merge_assigned_reloads
• 2002-10-07 11:37 Re: if-conversion pass....
• 2002-10-08 08:53 Re: Variable-sized types vs. templates
• 2002-10-08 09:12 Re: Variable-sized types vs. templates
• 2002-10-09 09:58 Re: divmod , signed division problem in rtl
• 2002-10-10 13:25 Re: subversions.gnu.org not being updated
• 2002-10-10 14:16 Re: [lsb-spec] Re: Standardizing _Unwind_* error handling interfa ces found in libgcc_s.so
• 2002-10-10 15:24 Re: [lsb-spec] Re: Standardizing _Unwind_* error handling interfa ces found in libgcc_s.so
• 2002-10-11 09:11 Re: running gcc testcases
• 2002-10-11 11:49 Re: gcc-backend query..
• 2002-10-15 12:59 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-15 13:19 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-15 14:32 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-15 15:05 Re: running gcc testcases
• 2002-10-15 15:32 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-15 15:59 Re: How to use Dejagnu for gcc-3.0?
• 2002-10-15 16:05 Re: How to use Dejagnu for gcc-3.0?
• 2002-10-16 09:28 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-16 09:43 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-16 10:43 Re: reading the gcc-IR in back-end
• 2002-10-17 15:15 Re: Trouble building gcc-3.2/libstdc++ on soft-fp m68k-linux
• 2002-10-17 17:31 Re: expalin this syntax pls
• 2002-10-18 09:17 Re: Query about reload pass !!
• 2002-10-18 09:27 Re: ia64 linux doesn't bootstrap
• 2002-10-18 19:54 Re: how to get value of real constant in .tu file
• 2002-10-21 16:17 Re: ia64 linux doesn't bootstrap
• 2002-10-22 12:30 Re: ia64 linux doesn't bootstrap
• 2002-10-25 10:40 Re: c++/6074 is a regression from 2.95
• 2002-10-25 15:38 Re: c++/6074 is a regression from 2.95

Jingzhao Ou

• 2002-10-29 01:24 "as" problem when cross-compiling gcc for PowerPC

JLC von Merzierenburg

• 2002-10-01 10:39 Your page http://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html

Joe Buck

• 2002-10-01 11:01 Re: very old versions of GCC...
• 2002-10-01 11:10 Re: Problem with using new libs with old app (without relink)
• 2002-10-01 11:27 Re: module level flags
• 2002-10-01 14:14 Re: module level flags
• 2002-10-03 11:40 Re: Convergence of GCC - slightly off topic
• 2002-10-03 14:48 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org
• 2002-10-03 14:55 Re: Register Allocation Algorithm..
• 2002-10-03 16:10 Re: Convergence of GCC - slightly off topic
• 2002-10-03 16:11 Re: module level flags
• 2002-10-03 17:18 Re: deprecate i960 now?
• 2002-10-03 17:37 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org
• 2002-10-03 18:11 3.2.1 draft release notes
• 2002-10-03 18:21 web page starting to show its age
• 2002-10-07 09:50 Re: Register Allocation Algorithm..
• 2002-10-08 10:31 3.2.1 draft release note (second draft)
• 2002-10-09 11:56 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-11 16:31 Re: Apple gcc 3.1 and OpenOffice.org
• 2002-10-14 15:40 gcc 3.2.1 draft release notes, 3rd draft
• 2002-10-15 09:21 Re: gcc 3.2.1 draft release notes, 3rd draft
• 2002-10-15 09:53 Re: XML dumping and GraphViz/VCG in the GCC ast-optimizer-branch
• 2002-10-15 10:19 Re: XML dumping and GraphViz/VCG in the GCC ast-optimizer-branch
• 2002-10-15 12:15 Re: XML dumping and GraphViz/VCG in the GCC ast-optimizer-branch
• 2002-10-15 18:40 Re: gcc 3.2.1 draft release notes, 3rd draft
• 2002-10-15 19:18 Re: Assignment legal documents?
• 2002-10-16 10:23 fourth draft: gcc 3.2.1 release notes
• 2002-10-18 10:41 restrict keyword [was: expalin this syntax pls]
• 2002-10-18 17:12 Re: restrict keyword [was: expalin this syntax pls]
• 2002-10-18 17:23 PR c++/8279: ostream_iterator problems
• 2002-10-21 15:35 Re: fourth draft: gcc 3.2.1 release notes
• 2002-10-21 15:59 yet another set of 3.2.1 draft release notes
• 2002-10-22 13:53 status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-22 15:16 Re: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-22 15:23 Re: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-22 15:27 Re: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-22 15:51 Re: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-22 18:52 Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-23 09:45 Re: Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-23 14:18 Re: Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-23 18:12 Re: GCC 3.2.1 -- Request for Bug Fixers
• 2002-10-23 18:39 Re: question about gcc
• 2002-10-28 11:40 time for bug triage?
• 2002-10-29 18:22 Re: How I know which modules from a givem library one program has?
• 2002-10-30 13:58 Re: PATCH for Re: web page starting to show its age
• 2002-10-31 10:48 release status and optimization/8334
• 2002-10-31 10:55 Re: gcc 3.2.1 schedule?
• 2002-10-31 13:24 Re: release status and optimization/8334
• 2002-10-31 13:36 Re: release status and optimization/8334
• 2002-10-31 14:12 Re: gcc 3.2.1 schedule?
• 2002-10-31 14:40 Re: gcc 3.2.1 schedule?

Joe Wilson

• 2002-10-21 08:12 Re: abysmal code generated by gcc 3.2
• 2002-10-21 08:23 Re: abysmal code generated by gcc 3.2

Joe Wong

• 2002-10-19 04:31 Re: Seeking...

Joel Sherrill

• 2002-10-14 11:13 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-16 05:38 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-16 13:43 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-18 05:35 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-18 08:27 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-20 09:43 Re: It's target deprecation season again!
• 2002-10-22 15:50 Re: Illegal code generation: gcc-3.2 --target=m68k-elf
• 2002-10-23 14:06 Re: Illegal code generation: gcc-3.2 --target=m68k-elf
• 2002-10-24 05:18 Re: GCC 3.2.1 -- Request for Bug Fixers

Joern Rennecke

• 2002-10-07 10:26 Re: x86 reload bug in merge_assigned_reloads
• 2002-10-09 09:02 gcc.dg/weak/typeof-2.c makes invalid assumptions about the assembler language
• 2002-10-14 10:04 Subject: Kernel bugs that trip expect (Was: Re: 2 new regression on darwin6.1)
• 2002-10-14 10:55 Re: Subject: Kernel bugs that trip expect (Was: Re: 2 new regression on darwin6.1)
• 2002-10-15 05:53 Re: Subject: Kernel bugs that trip expect (Was: Re: 2 new regression on darwin6.1)
• 2002-10-17 07:02 Re: real.c fails floating point tests
• 2002-10-21 12:20 Re: It's target deprecation season again!
• 2002-10-21 14:21 Re: It's target deprecation season again!
• 2002-10-30 13:23 Status of SSE builtins
• 2002-10-30 13:56 Re: reload reg
• 2002-10-30 14:21 Re: Status of SSE builtins
• 2002-10-30 14:36 Re: Status of SSE builtins
• 2002-10-30 14:58 Re: Need advice and example with a port to big endian machine that puts characters in the MOST significant byte of registers
• 2002-10-30 15:07 Re: Status of SSE builtins
• 2002-10-31 09:10 Re: Status of SSE builtins

John David Anglin

• 2002-10-01 16:05 Re: AIX bootstrap failure
• 2002-10-09 19:10 Re: Any problem with CVS repositry?
• 2002-10-09 19:49 Re: Any problem with CVS repositry?
• 2002-10-10 09:24 Re: gcc binary for HPUX 10.20 ?

John Elks

• 2002-10-09 05:29 Do you want to generate new business?
• 2002-10-09 05:29 Do you want to generate new business?

John Lu

• 2002-10-28 13:33 Data Type sizes question

John Marshall

• 2002-10-18 05:59 Re: gcc 3.2.1 draft release notes, 3rd draft

Joke A Day Confirmation from ListManager

• 2002-10-20 06:16 Your Confirmation Is Needed, Bucko!

Josep Maria

• 2002-10-18 14:27 Re:

Joseph S. Myers

• 2002-10-04 04:58 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org
• 2002-10-04 12:26 Re: Problems with Java segment of website
• 2002-10-04 13:41 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-05 12:43 Re: Testsuite reorganization, documentation, cleanup?
• 2002-10-08 18:01 Re: Bug reporting [Was: Re: [PATCH] change gnats.html to fix web/8168]
• 2002-10-14 11:21 Re: quote marks [was: Status of i18n patches]
• 2002-10-14 17:36 Re: C ABI changes between gcc 2.96 and gcc 3.2?
• 2002-10-15 16:48 Re: subversions.gnu.org not being updated (fwd)
• 2002-10-15 16:51 Re: XML dumping and GraphViz/VCG in the GCC ast-optimizer-branch
• 2002-10-16 01:23 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (eliminationof the bounds check)
• 2002-10-18 16:20 Re: restrict keyword [was: expalin this syntax pls]
• 2002-10-18 16:22 Re: It's target deprecation season again!
• 2002-10-18 17:23 Re: restrict keyword [was: expalin this syntax pls]
• 2002-10-22 15:44 Re: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-28 10:15 Re: List of Java Contributors

jxiong

• 2002-10-07 18:47 problem building cross compiler for arm-linux under cygwin

Kai Henningsen

• 2002-10-05 14:21 Re: module level flags

Kaoru Fukui

• 2002-10-04 23:01 Re: gcc-3.2 with glibc-2.3 compile problem

Karel Gardas

• 2002-10-09 12:34 basic_string linking related problem.
• 2002-10-09 23:15 Re: basic_string linking related problem
• 2002-10-23 02:25 Which gcc version to test?
• 2002-10-23 12:04 Re: Which gcc version to test?

Kaveh R. Ghazi

• 2002-10-02 07:22 Profiling on mips-irix6? (Testcase gcc.dg/nest.c failure)
• 2002-10-02 22:31 Re: Profiling on mips-irix6? (Testcase gcc.dg/nest.c failure)
• 2002-10-04 18:14 Re: in memorial to the autobuild regression checker
• 2002-10-11 20:51 Re: gcc-3.2 build problem in the java area
• 2002-10-12 20:05 Re: gcc-3_2-branch bootstrap failure when using bison-1.50
• 2002-10-12 20:08 Re: gcc-3_2-branch bootstrap failure when using bison-1.50
• 2002-10-13 14:00 Warning stats for all targets (was: Re: illegally shared subreg)
• 2002-10-15 07:45 Specifying dg-do based on the target ?
• 2002-10-17 20:59 Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse
• 2002-10-18 07:28 Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse
• 2002-10-22 17:20 Re: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-22 17:26 Re: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-22 21:24 Re: Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs

Kazu Hirata

• 2002-10-24 03:53 Re: linking problem
• 2002-10-26 05:59 Re: -mrelax does not work fully, 8 bit addressing issues
• 2002-10-26 13:08 A question about arg pointer elimination

kchak

• 2002-10-28 20:08 Register allocation - varying numbers

Kendall Bennett

• 2002-10-15 16:41 Assignment legal documents?
• 2002-10-16 11:29 Re: Assignment legal documents?
• 2002-10-18 11:00 Re: Assignment legal documents?

Kevin B. Hendricks

• 2002-10-11 11:13 Apple gcc 3.1 and OpenOffice.org
• 2002-10-11 19:25 Re: Apple gcc 3.1 and OpenOffice.org

Kevin Lawton

• 2002-10-11 12:05 Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)
• 2002-10-11 13:22 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)
• 2002-10-15 13:13 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)
• 2002-10-15 18:38 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)

Kevin Murphy

• 2002-10-11 15:08 Surplus Machine Still In Plant
• 2002-10-11 15:12 Surplus Machine Still In Plant

Kevin Ryde

• 2002-10-30 13:35 Re: optimization/6162: gcc 3.0.4: certain i386 asm reloader ice
• 2002-10-30 14:21 Re: optimization/6162: gcc 3.0.4: certain i386 asm reloader ice

khalid aggag

• 2002-10-02 10:27 Treelang on GCC 3.2

Khem Raj

• 2002-10-17 10:23 Successful build of gcc 3.2 on i686-pc-cygwin on Windows 2000

Kris Warkentin

• 2002-10-01 11:50 CR/NL problem with cpp.exe under Cygwin
• 2002-10-14 16:12 Re: beginner development

Kumar Gala

• 2002-10-02 20:00 Re: RFAdvice - a couple of old lost Altivec patches

Kurt Garloff

• 2002-10-22 03:18 Re: abysmal code generated by gcc 3.2

kwall

• 2002-10-02 16:57 Re: Convergence of GCC - slightly off topic
• 2002-10-04 03:47 Re: Does gcc 3.2 branch bootstrap on RedHat 7.3?
• 2002-10-06 06:36 Re: Make -pthread the generic Posix-threads option for gcc (was: Re: cc1plus errors)
• 2002-10-15 03:38 Re: gcc page
• 2002-10-17 07:34 Re: [GCC] removal from web archive of mailing list??? please?
• 2002-10-18 17:29 Re: restrict keyword [was: expalin this syntax pls]
• 2002-10-23 18:16 Re: question about gcc

leoneycv@earthlink.net

• 2002-10-30 20:39 xBASICALLYxHOTx

Li Guohua

• 2002-10-24 04:43 missing gthr-pthread.h

liu kunjie

• 2002-10-02 01:02 Does the assembler as-MCORE support preprocessing ?

Loic Dachary

• 2002-10-13 02:52 Re: subversions.gnu.org not being updated (fwd)
• 2002-10-13 07:06 Re: subversions.gnu.org not being updated (fwd)

Loren James Rittle

• 2002-10-01 17:41 Re: AIX bootstrap failure
• 2002-10-24 17:30 Re: missing gthr-pthread.h

Lorenzo Delana

• 2002-10-10 10:07 header compilation

Maciej W. Rozycki

• 2002-10-15 12:37 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-15 13:28 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-16 03:25 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-16 03:40 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-16 04:03 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-16 04:06 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-16 07:12 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-16 07:32 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-16 10:16 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work

Malte Schuenemann

• 2002-10-14 04:39 gcc 3 does not recognise qt-mt ?

marc.poulhies

• 2002-10-23 04:43 question about gcc

Mark Mitchell

• 2002-10-01 11:33 Re: AIX bootstrap failure
• 2002-10-01 14:54 Re: AIX bootstrap failure
• 2002-10-01 15:40 AIX bootstrap failure
• 2002-10-01 16:28 Re: AIX bootstrap failure
• 2002-10-02 00:53 VxWorks maintainership
• 2002-10-08 00:08 Variable-sized types vs. templates
• 2002-10-08 01:19 Re: Does gcc 3.2 branch bootstrap on RedHat 7.3?
• 2002-10-08 11:09 Re: 3.1/3.2 C++ ABI change
• 2002-10-08 11:09 Re: Bug tracking / Release Quality Assurance
• 2002-10-08 11:09 Re: C++ ABI change since 3.2 with no warning
• 2002-10-11 11:29 V3 vs. symbol versions
• 2002-10-14 21:01 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-14 21:02 Re: new edge coverage profiler on gcc 3.3
• 2002-10-14 22:22 Re: gcc 3.2.1 draft release notes, 3rd draft
• 2002-10-14 23:28 Re: gcc-3_2-branch bootstrap failure when using bison-1.50
• 2002-10-15 10:10 Re: gcc 3.2.1 draft release notes, 3rd draft
• 2002-10-15 11:37 PR 8134: C++ crash
• 2002-10-15 14:18 Re: string literals in struct initializers with C++
• 2002-10-15 15:27 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-15 15:33 Re: PR 8134: C++ crash
• 2002-10-15 16:54 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-16 11:04 Re: real.c fails floating point tests
• 2002-10-16 11:14 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-16 11:19 Re: "Have we branched yet?"
• 2002-10-16 11:30 Re: PR 8134: C++ crash
• 2002-10-16 11:54 Re: PR 8134: C++ crash
• 2002-10-16 13:28 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-16 13:35 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-16 14:07 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-16 14:56 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-16 15:05 Re: real.c fails floating point tests
• 2002-10-16 15:26 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-16 15:29 Re: using decls and template methods
• 2002-10-17 23:32 Re: gcc 3.2.1 draft release notes, 3rd draft
• 2002-10-18 15:27 Re: ia64 linux doesn't bootstrap
• 2002-10-18 15:54 Re: Current release schedule
• 2002-10-20 15:34 Re: It's target deprecation season again!
• 2002-10-20 15:43 Re: ia64 linux doesn't bootstrap
• 2002-10-20 22:16 Re: It's target deprecation season again!
• 2002-10-21 01:06 Re: [3.2] Reconsider patches for bison 1.50?
• 2002-10-21 08:48 Re: [3.2] Reconsider patches for bison 1.50?
• 2002-10-22 09:43 Re: PR 7306 (C++/i86 thunk bug with varargs)
• 2002-10-22 11:29 Re: PR 7306 (C++/i86 thunk bug with varargs)
• 2002-10-22 21:13 Re: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-23 09:10 Re: C++ compile-time performance regressions / PR 3083
• 2002-10-23 17:14 GCC 3.2.1 -- Request for Bug Fixers
• 2002-10-24 00:36 Re: Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-24 00:43 Re: 3.2 branch/openserver g++ test results looking bad
• 2002-10-24 10:37 Re: [Mainline regression] ICE when throwing strings
• 2002-10-25 09:13 Re: [Mainline regression] ICE when throwing strings
• 2002-10-25 10:24 Re: c++/6074 is a regression from 2.95
• 2002-10-25 13:24 Re: c++/6074 is a regression from 2.95
• 2002-10-25 15:40 Re: c++/6074 is a regression from 2.95
• 2002-10-30 12:05 Re: Improved use of TREE_SYMBOL_REFERENCED in the C++ front end
• 2002-10-30 16:20 DWARF question/inlining/local classes
• 2002-10-30 17:55 Re: DWARF question/inlining/local classes
• 2002-10-31 10:05 Re: Improved use of TREE_SYMBOL_REFERENCED in the C++ front end
• 2002-10-31 11:03 Re: Improved use of TREE_SYMBOL_REFERENCED in the C++ front end
• 2002-10-31 13:52 Re: Patch: stab info for const fields
• 2002-10-31 14:29 Re: Patch: stab info for const fields

Mark Wielaard

• 2002-10-04 07:16 Re: glibc-2.2.5 bug triggered by Java interpreter

Mark Yang

• 2002-10-07 11:00 cross compiler IDE on MacOS X

market

• 2002-10-08 01:45 Luoyang Zhong Ding Ancient Art Institute

Martin Pool

• 2002-10-01 22:38 gcc-3.2 -MD -o misbehaviour
• 2002-10-14 23:07 Re: gcc-3.2 -MD -o misbehaviour

Martin v. Loewis

• 2002-10-13 11:23 Status of i18n patches
• 2002-10-14 11:28 Re: quote marks [was: Status of i18n patches]
• 2002-10-26 11:51 Status of i18n patches (again)

Mathieu Roy

• 2002-10-11 01:05 Re: subversions.gnu.org not being updated (fwd)

Matt Austern

• 2002-10-01 14:25 vtable layout in 3.1 versus 3.3
• 2002-10-03 13:47 Re: Convergence of GCC - slightly off topic
• 2002-10-07 14:05 3.1/3.2 C++ ABI change
• 2002-10-10 12:51 When to emit the vtable for a class template
• 2002-10-10 14:09 Re: When to emit the vtable for a class template
• 2002-10-10 14:33 Re: When to emit the vtable for a class template
• 2002-10-29 12:36 Improved use of TREE_SYMBOL_REFERENCED in the C++ front end
• 2002-10-30 12:13 Re: Improved use of TREE_SYMBOL_REFERENCED in the C++ front end
• 2002-10-31 10:18 Re: Improved use of TREE_SYMBOL_REFERENCED in the C++ front end
• 2002-10-31 11:00 Re: Improved use of TREE_SYMBOL_REFERENCED in the C++ front end

Matt Thomas

• 2002-10-22 08:45 Re: real.c implementation

Matthew J. Waller

• 2002-10-16 02:58 removal from web archive of mailing list??? please?
• 2002-10-17 07:19 Re: [GCC] removal from web archive of mailing list??? please?
• 2002-10-17 07:36 Re: [GCC] removal from web archive of mailing list??? please?

Matthew Wilcox

• 2002-10-04 06:42 Missing warning?

Matthias Klose

• 2002-10-12 12:46 gcc-3_2-branch bootstrap failure when using bison-1.50
• 2002-10-13 15:47 Re: gcc-3_2-branch bootstrap failure when using bison-1.50
• 2002-10-15 01:27 Re: gcc-3_2-branch bootstrap failure when using bison-1.50
• 2002-10-20 15:41 Re: [3.2] Reconsider patches for bison 1.50?
• 2002-10-21 01:22 Re: [3.2] Reconsider patches for bison 1.50?
• 2002-10-22 15:57 Re: status of high-priority GNATS bugs

Mauricio Labra

• 2002-10-17 07:21 gcc strcpy pseudo bug or detail

MD

• 2002-10-08 01:46 Problem with libraries

Michael Buss

• 2002-10-18 11:49 Installing GCC on Mandrake SNF 7.2

MICHAEL GOODWIN

• 2002-10-25 12:05 gcc help

Michael Lovett

• 2002-10-04 12:11 Re: GCC Feature question

Michael Matz

• 2002-10-01 03:00 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-01 03:03 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-01 04:43 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-01 09:23 Re: Libtool problem (Was: Multilib libjava problem)
• 2002-10-01 12:09 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-01 14:59 Re: module level flags
• 2002-10-02 14:46 Re: Type based aliasing
• 2002-10-02 14:50 Re: Type based aliasing
• 2002-10-14 04:51 Re: gcc 3 does not recognise qt-mt ?
• 2002-10-14 14:04 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-14 14:06 Re: quote marks [was: Status of i18n patches]
• 2002-10-14 14:17 Re: Target ABIs with 16bit ints.
• 2002-10-14 14:18 Re: Target ABIs with 16bit ints.
• 2002-10-15 02:18 Re: quote marks [was: Status of i18n patches]
• 2002-10-15 07:20 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-15 07:25 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (eliminationof the bounds check)
• 2002-10-15 07:32 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (eliminationof the bounds check)
• 2002-10-15 08:12 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-15 13:27 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (eliminationof the bounds check)
• 2002-10-16 01:48 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (eliminationof the bounds check)
• 2002-10-16 01:53 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-16 02:40 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-16 13:27 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (eliminationof the bounds check)
• 2002-10-16 13:53 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-16 16:35 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-22 01:51 Re: abysmal code generated by gcc 3.2
• 2002-10-22 12:22 Re: porting gcc
• 2002-10-29 04:06 Re: Status of new graph-coloring register allocator?
• 2002-10-30 14:09 Re: optimization/6162: gcc 3.0.4: certain i386 asm reloader ice
• 2002-10-30 14:38 Re: optimization/6162: gcc 3.0.4: certain i386 asm reloader ice
• 2002-10-30 15:02 Re: optimization/6162: gcc 3.0.4: certain i386 asm reloader ice

Michael Ritzert

• 2002-10-15 11:55 Re: string literals in struct initializers with C++
• 2002-10-17 19:59 Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse

Michael S. Zick

• 2002-10-18 10:39 Re: - - - Accent Reduction Products...

Mika Heiskanen

• 2002-10-07 10:35 -Weffc++ feature request

Mike Cleary

• 2002-10-18 12:34 gcc make error

Mike Laman

• 2002-10-06 00:02 Need help restricting a shift instruction's shift count operand to a specific general purpose register
• 2002-10-14 21:18 Re: Target ABIs with 16bit ints.
• 2002-10-26 18:20 Need advice and example with a port to big endian machine that puts characters in the MOST significant byte of registers
• 2002-10-27 12:19 Can "call" and "call_value" pass a temp value into the function prologue in the RETURN value register?
• 2002-10-27 23:39 How can the "call" and "call_value" instructions determine whether they are calling a function that has a variable number of arguments?

Mike Stump

• 2002-10-02 12:39 Re: Does the assembler as-MCORE support preprocessing ?
• 2002-10-03 10:54 Re: deprecate i960 now?
• 2002-10-04 11:30 Re: rtl
• 2002-10-07 14:30 Re: Testsuite reorganization, documentation, cleanup?
• 2002-10-09 13:29 Re: Address of a member function at an object
• 2002-10-10 10:37 Re: header compilation
• 2002-10-11 10:31 Re: Questions how to test correct c++ library install.
• 2002-10-11 10:35 Re: GCC Installation
• 2002-10-14 10:53 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-14 14:02 Re: gcc page
• 2002-10-15 13:45 Re: "xgcc"-file
• 2002-10-15 16:10 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-15 17:20 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-16 16:31 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-16 16:36 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-16 16:53 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-17 09:17 Re: link error: multiple definition of
• 2002-10-18 15:01 Re: Installing GCC on Mandrake SNF 7.2
• 2002-10-18 16:05 Re: gcc 3.2
• 2002-10-18 16:33 Re: It's target deprecation season again!
• 2002-10-21 11:01 Re: abysmal code generated by gcc 3.2
• 2002-10-21 12:21 Re: abysmal code generated by gcc 3.2
• 2002-10-22 11:56 Re: porting gcc
• 2002-10-22 14:43 Re: porting gcc
• 2002-10-23 16:23 Re: relocations
• 2002-10-23 16:48 Re: question about gcc
• 2002-10-31 10:58 Re: what does this word mean?
• 2002-10-31 11:04 Re: Register allocation - varying numbers
• 2002-10-31 11:08 Re: rtl indexed addressing mode question
• 2002-10-31 11:37 Re: Opening archive files

Mile Davidovic

• 2002-10-06 03:55 Trouble with EABI

Ming Ouyang

• 2002-10-21 15:07 help on adding new insns like min/max
• 2002-10-21 15:32 Re: help on adding new insns like min/max
• 2002-10-21 16:06 Re: help on adding new insns like min/max
• 2002-10-21 16:22 Re: help on adding new insns like min/max
• 2002-10-21 17:34 Re: help on adding new insns like min/max
• 2002-10-21 18:03 Re: help on adding new insns like min/max
• 2002-10-21 18:17 Re: help on adding new insns like min/max

Mini_Thyagarajan

• 2002-10-11 08:10 GCC Installation

Miss Janet De Bont

• 2002-10-29 08:00 Your short film on TV - CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS to MIND-IGNITE - 13 x 56 MINUTES TV SERIES
• 2002-10-29 08:02 Your short film on TV - CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS to MIND-IGNITE - 13 x 56 MINUTES TV SERIES

Momchil Velikov

• 2002-10-09 10:56 Re: divmod , signed division problem in rtl
• 2002-10-14 07:45 Re: divmod , division+modulo problem in rtl

Mustafa Celik

• 2002-10-09 13:16 Address of a member function at an object

N V Krishna

• 2002-10-01 02:36 memory allocation to variables
• 2002-10-02 21:47 Re: fabs(-0.0) and soft-float
• 2002-10-03 23:55 rtl
• 2002-10-09 20:42 arguments size
• 2002-10-12 18:18 address of local variables.
• 2002-10-13 18:13 load multiple
• 2002-10-14 05:36 Re: load multiple
• 2002-10-15 18:09 Re: load multiple
• 2002-10-18 18:08 load multiple from const labels?
• 2002-10-23 09:53 INSN_UID same for two insns?
• 2002-10-23 09:57 Re: INSN_UID same for two insns?
• 2002-10-23 10:08 Re: INSN_UID same for two insns?
• 2002-10-23 10:59 Re: INSN_UID same for two insns?

Nathan .

• 2002-10-01 17:31 Re: g++ "loosing" options
• 2002-10-02 14:43 g++ errors
• 2002-10-04 15:55 cc1plus errors
• 2002-10-04 16:03 Re: cc1plus errors
• 2002-10-10 11:56 standard files errors...
• 2002-10-17 17:06 expalin this syntax pls

Nathan Sidwell

• 2002-10-02 14:24 Type based aliasing
• 2002-10-03 12:59 gnu on solaris
• 2002-10-05 11:56 Re: Type based aliasing
• 2002-10-06 05:19 Re: module level flags
• 2002-10-07 09:23 Re: Bug tracking / Release Quality Assurance
• 2002-10-08 02:12 Re: Variable-sized types vs. templates
• 2002-10-14 06:46 Re: new edge coverage profiler on gcc 3.3
• 2002-10-14 12:31 Target ABIs with 16bit ints.
• 2002-10-14 13:08 Re: Target ABIs with 16bit ints.
• 2002-10-15 08:28 Re: cvs problems?
• 2002-10-15 11:33 Re: new edge coverage profiler on gcc 3.3
• 2002-10-15 11:48 Re: PR 8134: C++ crash
• 2002-10-16 11:48 Re: PR 8134: C++ crash
• 2002-10-16 13:24 using decls and template methods
• 2002-10-22 10:49 gnats account
• 2002-10-25 01:14 Re: c++/6074 is a regression from 2.95
• 2002-10-25 13:24 Re: c++/6074 is a regression from 2.95

Nathanael Nerode

• 2002-10-01 22:27 toplevel of src working again.
• 2002-10-04 21:48 Testsuite reorganization, documentation, cleanup?
• 2002-10-05 00:00 Does anyone actually use GCC on Interix?
• 2002-10-05 11:36 Re: Does anyone actually use GCC on Interix?
• 2002-10-05 11:46 Re: Don't drop GCC on Interix!
• 2002-10-05 12:51 Re: testsuite cleanup?
• 2002-10-07 23:47 Re: Testsuite reorganization, documentation, cleanup?
• 2002-10-09 09:52 Re: Testsuite reorganization, documentation, cleanup?
• 2002-10-09 21:04 Re: Bug tracking / Release Quality Assurance
• 2002-10-15 21:08 "Have we branched yet?"
• 2002-10-16 07:31 GNATS
• 2002-10-16 07:42 Re: GNATS
• 2002-10-16 14:13 GNATS
• 2002-10-16 16:40 Re: GNATS
• 2002-10-28 08:03 High priority bugs status
• 2002-10-28 20:37 Status of new graph-coloring register allocator?
• 2002-10-30 12:29 Re: optimization/6162: gcc 3.0.4: certain i386 asm reloader ice

Neal D. Becker

• 2002-10-11 06:24 dependency analyzer vs. drawf
• 2002-10-11 06:36 Re: dependency analyzer vs. drawf

Neil Booth

• 2002-10-04 11:43 Re: Backport 'cpp include directory search order warning' patch to 3.2.1?
• 2002-10-04 12:32 Re: stage1 bootstrap failuer to build gcc.3.3: cppfiles.c:1168: error: parse error before ']' token etc.
• 2002-10-06 08:29 Re: Why C++ tests in C testsuite?
• 2002-10-06 08:39 Re: Why C++ tests in C testsuite?
• 2002-10-08 05:35 Re: Variable-sized types vs. templates
• 2002-10-08 06:57 Re: Bug tracking / Release Quality Assurance
• 2002-10-11 05:42 Re: 2 new regression on darwin6.1
• 2002-10-14 12:44 Re: gcc-3.2 -MD -o misbehaviour
• 2002-10-17 12:51 Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse
• 2002-10-19 05:44 Re: Seeking...
• 2002-10-22 11:54 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-23 12:27 Re: It's target deprecation season again!

Nicolas Boulay

• 2002-10-02 05:31 gcc-specific array operator in C
• 2002-10-03 01:46 Tr:Rep:Re: gcc-specific array operator in C

Nicole Anderson

• 2002-10-21 23:15 Internet listing

Nitin Gupta, Noida

• 2002-10-17 04:12 PATCH: h8300-elf fix for gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c

Nix

• 2002-10-20 10:30 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?

Olenin Vladimir

• 2002-10-01 00:40 Problem with using new libs with old app (without relink)

Olivier Hainque

• 2002-10-01 02:06 Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-01 02:57 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-01 03:40 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-01 06:49 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-01 07:08 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-01 08:44 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-01 09:46 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-02 13:19 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-03 05:55 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-03 06:17 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-15 03:46 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-16 00:31 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges

Paolo Carlini

• 2002-10-23 05:08 Re: Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-28 08:11 Re: High priority bugs status
• 2002-10-31 12:53 Re: release status and optimization/8334

Paul Jarc

• 2002-10-14 10:37 Re: V3 vs. symbol versions
• 2002-10-23 13:47 Re: Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-24 08:32 Re: Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-24 09:17 Re: Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-24 13:04 Re: Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-24 16:45 Re: Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-31 11:04 Re: gcc 3.2.1 schedule?
• 2002-10-31 13:39 Re: gcc 3.2.1 schedule?
• 2002-10-31 14:17 Re: gcc 3.2.1 schedule?
• 2002-10-31 14:37 Re: gcc 3.2.1 schedule?
• 2002-10-31 14:40 Re: -Wp,<options>
• 2002-10-31 15:03 PR 8146 (was: gcc 3.2.1 schedule?)

Paul Koning

• 2002-10-02 08:54 Re: pointers are not permitted as case values
• 2002-10-14 10:03 Re: quote marks [was: Status of i18n patches]
• 2002-10-15 13:02 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-16 07:01 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-17 06:51 Re: [GCC] removal from web archive of mailing list??? please?
• 2002-10-17 06:54 Re: GCC floating point usage

Per Bothner

• 2002-10-14 09:14 quote marks [was: Status of i18n patches]
• 2002-10-14 12:28 Re: quote marks [was: Status of i18n patches]
• 2002-10-14 14:44 Re: quote marks [was: Status of i18n patches]
• 2002-10-29 14:21 Subject: Removing the arg_index field from cpp_hashnode
• 2002-10-29 15:40 Re: Subject: Removing the arg_index field from cpp_hashnode

Peter Barada

• 2002-10-17 14:16 Trouble building gcc-3.2/libstdc++ on soft-fp m68k-linux
• 2002-10-21 16:22 Illegal code generation: gcc-3.2 --target=m68k-elf
• 2002-10-22 08:30 Re: Illegal code generation: gcc-3.2 --target=m68k-elf
• 2002-10-22 09:50 Re: Illegal code generation: gcc-3.2 --target=m68k-elf
• 2002-10-22 11:49 Re: Illegal code generation: gcc-3.2 --target=m68k-elf
• 2002-10-23 13:55 Re: Illegal code generation: gcc-3.2 --target=m68k-elf
• 2002-10-23 15:08 Re: Illegal code generation: gcc-3.2 --target=m68k-elf
• 2002-10-24 09:28 Re: GCC 3.2.1 -- Request for Bug Fixers
• 2002-10-25 17:44 Re: target/8309
• 2002-10-29 07:17 Re: Status of new graph-coloring register allocator?
• 2002-10-29 08:02 Re: Status of new graph-coloring register allocator?

Petr Sebor

• 2002-10-23 02:27 attribute "section" problem

Phil Edwards

• 2002-10-01 17:40 Re: g++ "loosing" options
• 2002-10-02 18:59 Re: Convergence of GCC - slightly off topic
• 2002-10-02 19:01 Re: g++ errors
• 2002-10-02 19:32 Re: Help me isolate a bug!
• 2002-10-03 17:50 Re: deprecate i960 now?
• 2002-10-04 10:50 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-04 15:58 Re: cc1plus errors
• 2002-10-04 20:25 Re: cc1plus errors
• 2002-10-04 20:29 Re: cc1plus errors
• 2002-10-04 20:44 Re: in memorial to the autobuild regression checker
• 2002-10-05 16:39 Re: Make -pthread the generic Posix-threads option for gcc (was: Re: cc1plus errors)
• 2002-10-10 13:50 Re: standard files errors...
• 2002-10-15 17:03 Re: Assignment legal documents?
• 2002-10-16 17:57 Re: iostream question
• 2002-10-18 14:37 Re: gcc strcpy pseudo bug or detail
• 2002-10-24 08:39 Re: exporting symbols in shared libraries
• 2002-10-24 19:18 Re: Simple code produces ICE in gcc-3.2.1
• 2002-10-24 21:15 quickstrap, et al, at the top level?
• 2002-10-25 10:34 Re: quickstrap, et al, at the top level?
• 2002-10-25 15:25 Re: quickstrap, et al, at the top level?
• 2002-10-25 15:49 Re: quickstrap, et al, at the top level?
• 2002-10-27 12:00 Re: help: why libstdc++.so.5 not found after installed gcc-3.2
• 2002-10-30 16:07 Re: Exhaustive simulator testing

Philippe Trottier

• 2002-10-03 04:07 Re: c/8131: Union of struct of union of struct bit field

Pospori Nayia

• 2002-10-28 07:36 Enquete: Composition du Menage et Niveau de Vie
• 2002-10-28 07:37 Enquete: Composition du Menage et Niveau de Vie

Qiong Cai

• 2002-10-12 15:01 new edge coverage profiler on gcc 3.3

Qstore

• 2002-10-15 09:00 In The Q Store Owners

Quinn Harris

• 2002-10-04 22:45 gcc-3.2 with glibc-2.3 compile problem

Raghuveer Aravindan

• 2002-10-07 09:22 Sun Tag
• 2002-10-07 09:42 Re: Sun Tag
• 2002-10-07 09:50 Re: Sun Tag

Raimonds Cicans

• 2002-10-11 03:50 Q(backend): Indirect register access

Ralf Corsepius

• 2002-10-23 02:57 Re: It's target deprecation season again!

Ralph Loader

• 2002-10-11 19:15 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (eliminationof the bounds check)

Randy.Dunlap

• 2002-10-01 09:21 Re: How to learn linux device driver

Ranjit Singh

• 2002-10-06 00:12 Modifying Insns
• 2002-10-18 05:29 Query about reload pass !!
• 2002-10-28 04:23 Knowing Whether a function contains inner nested functions.

Ravikiran Rajagopal

• 2002-10-12 18:20 hppa64 threading

Rayson Ho

• 2002-10-24 09:06 Re: exporting symbols in shared libraries

RE

• 2002-10-17 02:19 RE: [info@fsf.org: GCC bounds checking]

Reichelt

• 2002-10-15 03:06 Re: gcc 3.2.1 draft release notes, 3rd draft
• 2002-10-16 02:07 Re: PR 8134: C++ crash
• 2002-10-23 05:06 Re: Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-24 02:32 [Mainline regression] ICE when throwing strings
• 2002-10-25 06:31 Re: [Mainline regression] ICE when throwing strings
• 2002-10-28 04:56 Obsolete installation instructions and inconvenient CVS HOWTO

Reinhard

• 2002-10-26 08:42 You are invited
• 2002-10-26 08:43 You are invited

Rekha Deshmukh

• 2002-10-31 22:04 gcc -save-temps foo.c fails to build foo.o

Remote Mailer Four

• 2002-10-22 07:23 Thank you for contacting the .NET Framework SDK Team.

Reza Roboubi

• 2002-10-12 09:19 virtual inline optimizations

Richard Earnshaw

• 2002-10-02 05:12 Re: Testing with multilibs?
• 2002-10-08 06:08 Re: Variable-sized types vs. templates
• 2002-10-08 07:31 Re: Variable-sized types vs. templates
• 2002-10-08 09:04 Re: Variable-sized types vs. templates
• 2002-10-11 02:32 Re: 2 new regression on darwin6.1
• 2002-10-29 03:21 Re: load multiple from const labels?

Richard Guenther

• 2002-10-10 02:15 Small object optimizations

Richard Henderson

• 2002-10-01 13:43 Re: memrefs_conflict_p () for REGs in alias.c
• 2002-10-02 17:42 Re: -msse, -mmmx and other "-m"-Options impossible?
• 2002-10-02 21:26 Re: fabs(-0.0) and soft-float
• 2002-10-02 22:58 Re: if-conv problem....
• 2002-10-03 10:32 deprecate i960 now?
• 2002-10-03 12:13 Re: if-conv problem....
• 2002-10-03 12:15 Re: Tr:Rep:Re: gcc-specific array operator in C
• 2002-10-03 12:18 Re: c/8131: Union of struct of union of struct bit field
• 2002-10-03 16:12 Re: gnu on solaris
• 2002-10-03 17:33 Re: floating point decimal to binary conversion errors
• 2002-10-03 17:34 Re: trying to build cross compiler for powerpc w/x686 host - no crti.o
• 2002-10-03 17:35 Re: module level flags
• 2002-10-03 17:50 Re: Bootstrap on MSVC broken (real.c ICEs compiling floatdidf()) .. was RE: Bootstrap still broken on ia64
• 2002-10-03 19:14 Re: Advice needed how to avoid generation of extra sign_extends in .md file
• 2002-10-03 22:28 Re: xfail gcc.dg test
• 2002-10-04 01:08 Re: xfail gcc.dg test
• 2002-10-04 11:10 Re: deprecate i960 now?
• 2002-10-04 12:00 Re: libgcc2 __fixsfdi
• 2002-10-04 13:40 Re: xfail gcc.dg test
• 2002-10-04 14:18 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-04 15:23 Re: x86 reload bug in merge_assigned_reloads
• 2002-10-05 15:00 Re: xfail gcc.dg test
• 2002-10-06 13:39 Re: [basic-improvements] bootstrap failure on x86
• 2002-10-06 13:42 Re: Need help restricting a shift instruction's shift count operand to a specific general purpose register
• 2002-10-06 21:39 Re: [PATCH] for gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20020411-1.c
• 2002-10-07 02:54 Re: Reverting Mark's cp patch (Was: Re: [basic-improvements] bootstrap failure on x86)
• 2002-10-07 17:43 Re: ppc glibc 2.3 failure
• 2002-10-07 18:31 Re: ppc glibc 2.3 failure
• 2002-10-08 10:32 Re: Approval question
• 2002-10-08 10:59 Re: libgcc2 __fixsfdi
• 2002-10-09 14:43 Re: [PATCH] for gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20020219-1.c
• 2002-10-10 10:21 Re: Small object optimizations
• 2002-10-10 10:25 Re: Standardizing _Unwind_* error handling interfaces found in libgcc_s.so
• 2002-10-10 15:15 Re: [lsb-spec] Re: Standardizing _Unwind_* error handling interfa ces found in libgcc_s.so
• 2002-10-12 10:03 Re: virtual inline optimizations
• 2002-10-15 15:16 Re: streams is slow under gcc
• 2002-10-15 15:19 Re: regression in simd-4.c on darwin6.1
• 2002-10-15 15:23 Re: address of local variables.
• 2002-10-15 15:35 Re: load multiple
• 2002-10-15 15:38 Re: C++ slow/swappy problem solved
• 2002-10-15 15:43 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-15 16:02 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-15 21:19 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-16 09:19 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-16 09:21 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-16 13:14 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-16 13:23 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)
• 2002-10-16 13:38 Re: real.c fails floating point tests
• 2002-10-16 15:00 Re: real.c fails floating point tests
• 2002-10-16 15:03 Re: real.c fails floating point tests
• 2002-10-16 15:27 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-16 16:38 Re: real.c fails floating point tests
• 2002-10-16 16:46 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-16 16:48 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-17 08:55 Re: real.c fails floating point tests
• 2002-10-17 09:40 Re: Improving Alias Analysis
• 2002-10-18 11:35 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-18 16:59 Re: real_to_decimal rounds incorrectly
• 2002-10-18 17:04 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-19 15:47 Re: real_to_decimal rounds incorrectly
• 2002-10-20 11:42 Re: How is generic SIMD support supposed to work?
• 2002-10-21 10:20 Re: splitting addhi, addsi
• 2002-10-21 15:37 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-21 17:27 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-21 23:00 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-21 23:27 Re: Illegal code generation: gcc-3.2 --target=m68k-elf
• 2002-10-21 23:30 Re: Question on insn scheduling and SP
• 2002-10-21 23:31 Re: abysmal code generated by gcc 3.2
• 2002-10-21 23:35 Re: .init_array/.fini_array
• 2002-10-22 09:45 Re: Illegal code generation: gcc-3.2 --target=m68k-elf
• 2002-10-22 09:53 Re: Question on insn scheduling and SP
• 2002-10-22 10:43 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-22 11:00 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-22 11:06 Re: peephole2 and insn question
• 2002-10-22 11:11 Re: Question on insn scheduling and SP
• 2002-10-22 11:16 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-22 14:35 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-23 09:57 Re: Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-23 10:02 Re: INSN_UID same for two insns?
• 2002-10-23 10:06 Re: relocations
• 2002-10-23 10:12 Re: INSN_UID same for two insns?
• 2002-10-23 11:19 Re: INSN_UID same for two insns?
• 2002-10-24 15:31 Re: Simple code produces ICE in gcc-3.2.1
• 2002-10-25 11:24 Re: c/7464: weak symbols alias definitions are broken in 3.1.1 (weak alias regression from 2.95)
• 2002-10-25 11:27 Re: gcc-3.2 and lsb compatible elf format
• 2002-10-25 13:28 Re: 8086 target generation
• 2002-10-25 15:58 Re: GCC 3.2 branch libstdc++ abi_check.cc bootstrap failure on AIX
• 2002-10-25 17:27 Re: GCC 3.2 branch libstdc++ abi_check.cc bootstrap failure on AIX
• 2002-10-26 09:37 Re: GCC 3.2 branch libstdc++ abi_check.cc bootstrap failure on AIX
• 2002-10-29 06:01 Re: Can "call" and "call_value" pass a temp value into the function prologue in the RETURN value register?
• 2002-10-31 08:52 Re: Status of SSE builtins
• 2002-10-31 08:57 Re: Status of SSE builtins
• 2002-10-31 09:16 Re: Status of SSE builtins
• 2002-10-31 10:25 Re: condition codes question
• 2002-10-31 10:37 Re: Improved use of TREE_SYMBOL_REFERENCED in the C++ front end
• 2002-10-31 10:50 Re: DWARF question/inlining/local classes
• 2002-10-31 10:53 Re: Using get_attr_type in final_prescan_insn
• 2002-10-31 15:08 Re: Improved use of TREE_SYMBOL_REFERENCED in the C++ front end
• 2002-10-31 17:06 Re: Using SCRATCH Register for a mov op,
• 2002-10-31 18:23 Re: -Wp,<options>

Richard Kenner

• 2002-10-15 03:57 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-15 19:15 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-16 04:39 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-16 04:45 Re: Question on fixup_abnormal_edges
• 2002-10-21 11:27 Your change to expmed.c on 3/13/2002
• 2002-10-21 16:22 Question on insn scheduling and SP
• 2002-10-21 18:02 Re: Question on insn scheduling and SP
• 2002-10-22 03:36 Re: Question on insn scheduling and SP
• 2002-10-22 10:23 Re: Question on insn scheduling and SP
• 2002-10-31 13:37 Re: Patch: stab info for const fields
• 2002-10-31 14:05 Re: Patch: stab info for const fields
• 2002-10-31 14:33 Re: Patch: stab info for const fields
• 2002-10-31 15:24 Re: Patch: stab info for const fields
• 2002-10-31 16:04 Re: Patch: stab info for const fields

Richard Sandiford

• 2002-10-14 09:09 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work
• 2002-10-14 09:35 Re: MIPS gas relaxation still doesn't work

Richard Smith

• 2002-10-01 07:13 Bug in -felide-constructors -- regression against 3.0.x.

Richard Zidlicky

• 2002-10-14 05:44 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)

Ritu Sabharwal

• 2002-10-01 12:24 Finding resource usage for RTL instructions........
• 2002-10-02 09:32 Finding resource usage for RTL instructions..
• 2002-10-03 10:04 Register Allocation Algorithm..
• 2002-10-04 17:31 if-conversion pass....
• 2002-10-08 17:39 Segmentation fault in compiling gcc 3.0
• 2002-10-11 16:11 How to use Dejagnu for gcc-3.0?
• 2002-10-12 04:18 RE: How to use Dejagnu for gcc-3.0?
• 2002-10-12 15:19 Does 'make install' changes xgcc?
• 2002-10-13 12:30 Does 'make install' changes xgcc?
• 2002-10-15 23:40 Loop dependence analysis!!
• 2002-10-17 13:49 Re: Loop dependence analysis!!
• 2002-10-18 21:55 Error in building gcc!!
• 2002-10-20 22:55 How to traverse the tree structure for each function??

Rob

• 2002-10-15 01:08 RE: Throw/Catch not working in SO?

Rob Aberg

• 2002-10-27 10:28 Statement incorrect in doc

Robert Dewar

• 2002-10-01 13:33 Re: module level flags
• 2002-10-01 22:52 Re: module level flags
• 2002-10-02 14:39 Re: Convergence of GCC - slightly off topic
• 2002-10-03 17:26 Re: deprecate i960 now?
• 2002-10-04 04:49 Re: deprecate i960 now?
• 2002-10-04 18:05 Re: Still getting phantom unsub requests issued.
• 2002-10-05 03:33 Re: deprecate i960 now?
• 2002-10-05 12:00 Re: Type based aliasing
• 2002-10-05 13:33 Re: Type based aliasing
• 2002-10-05 13:56 Re: Type based aliasing
• 2002-10-11 12:08 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)
• 2002-10-14 20:19 Re: [Ada] ASIS support for gcc 3.X versions
• 2002-10-15 07:13 Re: XML dumping and GraphViz/VCG in the GCC ast-optimizer-branch
• 2002-10-15 07:34 Re: XML dumping and GraphViz/VCG in the GCC ast-optimizer-branch
• 2002-10-15 10:10 Re: compiling gnat on osx
• 2002-10-15 18:41 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)
• 2002-10-16 07:40 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)
• 2002-10-16 07:47 Re: real.c fails floating point tests
• 2002-10-16 08:06 Re: real.c fails floating point tests
• 2002-10-16 17:20 Re: real.c fails floating point tests
• 2002-10-16 17:29 Re: real.c fails floating point tests
• 2002-10-17 14:55 Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse
• 2002-10-17 15:00 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-17 15:02 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-17 17:10 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-17 17:10 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-18 06:53 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-18 07:21 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-18 07:23 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-18 07:24 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-18 07:32 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-18 07:33 Re: real.c fails floating point tests
• 2002-10-18 08:56 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-18 08:56 Re: [Ada] ASIS support for gcc 3.X versions
• 2002-10-18 09:11 Re: Ada/GNAT runtime library?
• 2002-10-20 18:22 Re: It's target deprecation season again!
• 2002-10-21 20:42 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-22 03:11 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-22 03:38 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-22 03:50 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-22 03:58 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-22 04:01 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-22 08:49 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-22 11:11 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-22 11:25 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-22 17:50 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-22 18:08 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-23 19:22 Re: question about gcc
• 2002-10-25 19:06 Re: real.c implementation

Robert Lipe

• 2002-10-01 22:56 Re: Testing with multilibs?
• 2002-10-07 13:33 Re: SCO OpenServer Build status for GCC 2.95
• 2002-10-07 13:36 Re: SCO OpenServer Build status for GCC 2.95
• 2002-10-23 06:41 Re: Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-23 10:32 Re: Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-23 10:52 3.2 branch/openserver g++ test results looking bad
• 2002-10-24 09:09 Re: 3.2 branch/openserver g++ test results looking bad
• 2002-10-24 11:39 Re: 3.2 branch/openserver g++ test results looking bad

Robert Schweikert

• 2002-10-15 02:11 iostream question
• 2002-10-16 17:52 Re: iostream question

Roger Sayle

• 2002-10-08 06:22 Re: Bug tracking / Release Quality Assurance
• 2002-10-08 07:07 Re: Bug tracking / Release Quality Assurance
• 2002-10-18 19:40 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-19 07:39 Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse
• 2002-10-19 10:40 Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse
• 2002-10-19 12:01 Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse
• 2002-10-28 20:47 Re: [i386] memcmp very slow

Roman Levenshteyn (EED)

• 2002-10-08 01:16 OpenWatcom compiler source code is available now
• 2002-10-08 03:36 RE: OpenWatcom compiler source code is available now

Rupert Wood

• 2002-10-06 04:48 Re: Does anyone actually use GCC on Interix?

Russ Allbery

• 2002-10-10 19:42 Re: gcc-3.2 build problem in the java area
• 2002-10-17 17:26 Re: [GCC] removal from web archive of mailing list??? please?
• 2002-10-18 22:33 Re: It's target deprecation season again!

S. Bosscher

• 2002-10-21 08:37 Re: An ask for documentation of trees

Saisanthosh Balakrishnan

• 2002-10-28 10:29 basic-block profiling
• 2002-10-28 10:36 Re: basic-block profiling
• 2002-10-28 10:58 Re: basic-block profiling

Sanjiv Kumar Gupta, Noida

• 2002-10-17 05:22 Improving Alias Analysis
• 2002-10-18 04:21 RE: Improving Alias Analysis
• 2002-10-18 04:34 RE: Improving Alias Analysis
• 2002-10-21 03:28 RE: Improving Alias Analysis
• 2002-10-26 04:10 CSE failing for SH due to weak alias analysis

sashidhar

• 2002-10-29 21:30 gcc optimization for scyld OS

Satya

• 2002-10-29 15:44 Opening archive files
• 2002-10-30 11:53 Problem in make

Scott Neugroschl

• 2002-10-11 13:57 GCC 3.2 docs in A4 Only?
• 2002-10-11 13:59 FW: GCC 3.2 docs in A4 Only?

scox

• 2002-10-16 07:53 Re: Loop dependence analysis!!

SexLetter

• 2002-10-26 12:20 ATTENZIONE!
• 2002-10-26 12:21 ATTENZIONE!

shaurya arora

• 2002-10-27 12:00 TYPE_SEP for ARRAYs
• 2002-10-27 12:40 Re: Remove reference to nonexistent TYPE_* macros from tree.def

Shawn Starr

• 2002-10-22 18:11 Question on PCH and future 3.4(?)
• 2002-10-25 09:01 GCC default structure packing on SPARC Solaris and IA32 Linux

Shekhar Divekar

• 2002-10-04 06:03 Re: rtl

Shin, Dong In

• 2002-10-14 21:14 I have a question about gcc version.

shirish deshmukh

• 2002-10-09 06:07 Need info for tree to rtl conversion

skunk

• 2002-10-26 12:31 Auto respuesta
• 2002-10-30 09:18 Auto respuesta

snmp toddler

• 2002-10-01 16:35 g++ "loosing" options

Spundun Bhatt

• 2002-10-22 12:12 Re: machine description porting question.
• 2002-10-22 12:15 PLEASE DISREGARD MY PREVIOUR MAIL Re: machine description porting question.
• 2002-10-30 17:27 rtl indexed addressing mode question

Stan Shebs

• 2002-10-01 15:33 Re: Release schedule
• 2002-10-02 16:19 Re: RFAdvice - a couple of old lost Altivec patches
• 2002-10-03 11:26 Re: deprecate i960 now?
• 2002-10-03 11:32 Re: deprecate i960 now?
• 2002-10-03 18:48 Re: deprecate i960 now?
• 2002-10-04 16:04 Re: speed benchmark ?
• 2002-10-04 17:07 Re: in memorial to the autobuild regression checker
• 2002-10-05 14:04 Re: testsuite cleanup?
• 2002-10-07 14:59 Re: Testsuite reorganization, documentation, cleanup?
• 2002-10-08 09:21 Re: Testsuite reorganization, documentation, cleanup?
• 2002-10-11 09:41 Re: 2 new regression on darwin6.1

Stefan Bylund

• 2002-10-11 03:20 Why eh_frame sections in libgcc.a?
• 2002-10-14 09:28 GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-14 10:09 Re: GCC floating point usage

Stephen Keane

• 2002-10-01 01:55 gcc documentation

Stephen L Moshier

• 2002-10-03 13:49 floating point decimal to binary conversion errors
• 2002-10-15 13:29 real_to_decimal rounds incorrectly
• 2002-10-16 07:37 real.c fails floating point tests
• 2002-10-16 10:37 Re: real.c fails floating point tests
• 2002-10-16 14:54 Re: real.c fails floating point tests
• 2002-10-16 15:54 Re: real.c fails floating point tests
• 2002-10-18 05:42 Re: real.c fails floating point tests
• 2002-10-19 10:54 Re: real_to_decimal rounds incorrectly
• 2002-10-19 18:36 Re: real_to_decimal rounds incorrectly
• 2002-10-21 12:30 Re: real_to_decimal rounds incorrectly
• 2002-10-25 18:00 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-25 19:06 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-27 03:48 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-28 03:58 Re: real.c implementation

Steve Ellcey

• 2002-10-21 09:37 .init_array/.fini_array

Steve Kargl

• 2002-10-23 22:01 Simple code produces ICE in gcc-3.2.1
• 2002-10-23 22:31 Re: Simple code produces ICE in gcc-3.2.1
• 2002-10-23 23:52 Re: Simple code produces ICE in gcc-3.2.1
• 2002-10-24 15:55 Re: Simple code produces ICE in gcc-3.2.1
• 2002-10-25 06:51 Re: Simple code produces ICE in gcc-3.2.1

Stuart Clarke

• 2002-10-23 00:33 relocations
• 2002-10-23 00:38 Re: relocations

Sun Glasses

• 2002-10-30 20:31 Sun Glasses

Svein E. Seldal

• 2002-10-22 12:32 Re: porting gcc

Taha Mannan Jiruwala

• 2002-10-06 21:28 Code Optimization
• 2002-10-06 23:54 Re: Code Optimization

The Lords Mall

• 2002-10-28 17:28 Christians please read

Theodore Papadopoulo

• 2002-10-10 12:58 Re: subversions.gnu.org not being updated

Tim & Les

• 2002-10-05 11:13 Why not move out of the city? Website developers move to Show Low, AZ !
• 2002-10-05 11:14 Why not move out of the city? Website developers move to Show Low, AZ !

Tim Hollebeek

• 2002-10-02 09:08 Re: pointers are not permitted as case values
• 2002-10-15 19:04 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)
• 2002-10-16 13:02 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)

Tim Prince

• 2002-10-02 21:38 Re: Profiling on mips-irix6? (Testcase gcc.dg/nest.c failure)
• 2002-10-12 17:20 Re: Does 'make install' changes xgcc?
• 2002-10-18 05:59 Re: ia64 linux doesn't bootstrap
• 2002-10-18 23:07 Re: ia64 linux doesn't bootstrap
• 2002-10-19 12:12 Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse
• 2002-10-29 19:45 Re: Missing pieces??

Titty

• 2002-10-16 04:02 Sexletter

Tom Lord

• 2002-10-04 17:32 Re: in memorial to the autobuild regression checker
• 2002-10-23 02:59 Re: regex and gcc question

Tom Tromey

• 2002-10-02 13:30 Re: glibc-2.2.5 bug triggered by Java interpreter
• 2002-10-07 13:08 Re: glibc-2.2.5 bug triggered by Java interpreter
• 2002-10-08 15:37 Re: gcc.gnu.org: web server config problem
• 2002-10-11 09:48 Re: gcc-3.2 build problem in the java area
• 2002-10-11 10:55 Re: gcc-3.2 build problem in the java area
• 2002-10-11 11:05 Re: gcc-3.2 build problem in the java area

Tony Bryant

• 2002-10-12 18:17 Slow/Swappy C++ compilation
• 2002-10-13 16:57 Re: Slow/Swappy C++ compilation
• 2002-10-13 18:53 C++ slow/swappy problem solved

Toon Moene

• 2002-10-05 08:31 Re: module level flags
• 2002-10-05 11:21 Re: Type based aliasing
• 2002-10-05 12:36 Re: web page starting to show its age
• 2002-10-05 12:45 Re: Type based aliasing
• 2002-10-05 13:48 Re: Type based aliasing
• 2002-10-29 13:36 Re: Missing pieces??

Torbjorn Granlund

• 2002-10-30 14:55 Re: optimization/6162: gcc 3.0.4: certain i386 asm reloader ice

tprinceusa

• 2002-10-21 18:43 Re: Fortran Vs. C (g77 vs GCC) for numerical analyses
• 2002-10-23 21:23 Re: ia64 linux doesn't bootstrap

Travis Seiler

• 2002-10-02 11:56 Question about gcc 3.2

Trevor Jenkins

• 2002-10-03 14:38 Still getting phantom unsub requests issued.
• 2002-10-16 14:56 Re: [GCC] removal from web archive of mailing list??? please?

Udo Tremel

• 2002-10-18 15:47 gcc 3.2

Ulrich Weigand

• 2002-10-01 10:08 libffi return value convention bug
• 2002-10-02 08:05 glibc-2.2.5 bug triggered by Java interpreter
• 2002-10-04 07:07 Re: glibc-2.2.5 bug triggered by Java interpreter
• 2002-10-09 09:47 Re: gcc.dg/weak/typeof-2.c makes invalid assumptions about the assemblerlanguage
• 2002-10-15 11:48 Re: gcc 3.2.1 draft release notes, 3rd draft
• 2002-10-21 17:11 Re: ia64 linux doesn't bootstrap
• 2002-10-22 07:41 Re: ia64 linux doesn't bootstrap
• 2002-10-31 12:24 Re: gcc 3.2.1 schedule?
• 2002-10-31 14:07 Re: gcc 3.2.1 schedule?
• 2002-10-31 14:32 Re: gcc 3.2.1 schedule?
• 2002-10-31 14:38 Re: gcc 3.2.1 schedule?

Unruh, Erwin

• 2002-10-23 04:36 Re: It's target deprecation season again!

Valle, Adam

• 2002-10-07 12:48 RE: SCO OpenServer Build status for GCC 2.95
• 2002-10-07 15:05 RE: SCO OpenServer Build status for GCC 2.95

vargenau

• 2002-10-03 06:51 http://gcc.gnu.org
• 2002-10-04 01:59 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org
• 2002-10-04 08:01 Re: PATCH for Re: http://gcc.gnu.org
• 2002-10-07 02:26 Re: PATCH for Re: http://gcc.gnu.org

Vladimir Makarov

• 2002-10-01 11:17 Re: [DFA]: Scheduling for zSeries and S/390
• 2002-10-01 13:01 Re: modulo scheduling for IA64
• 2002-10-21 07:24 Re: DFA Scheduling Queries
• 2002-10-31 08:57 Re: Incorrect DFA scheduling of inline assembly

Wesley Pegden

• 2002-10-14 15:31 beginner development

Wichmann, Mats D

• 2002-10-10 10:38 RE: [lsb-spec] Re: Standardizing _Unwind_* error handling interfaces found in libgcc_s.so

Wolfgang Bangerth

• 2002-10-08 17:23 Bug reporting [Was: Re: [PATCH] change gnats.html to fix web/8168]
• 2002-10-24 16:15 c++/6074 is a regression from 2.95
• 2002-10-25 07:06 Re: c/7464: weak symbols alias definitions are broken in 3.1.1 (weakalias regression from 2.95)
• 2002-10-25 07:37 Re: c/7464: weak symbols alias definitions are broken in 3.1.1 (weakalias regression from 2.95)
• 2002-10-25 08:46 Re: c++/6074 is a regression from 2.95
• 2002-10-28 09:32 Problems with message translations (was: c++/7765)
• 2002-10-28 10:48 Re: Problems with message translations (was: c++/7765)
• 2002-10-28 16:22 Serious regression: c++/8287

Xiang Zhang

• 2002-10-10 15:18 How to get GCC manual webpage in one gzip file

yabada badoo

• 2002-10-02 11:47 Convergence of GCC - slightly off topic

Yaroslav Popovitch

• 2002-10-25 07:45 gcc-3.2 and lsb compatible elf format

Zack Weinberg

• 2002-10-01 11:05 [basic-improvements] Merge from mainline 2002-09-30
• 2002-10-02 15:33 RFAdvice - a couple of old lost Altivec patches
• 2002-10-02 15:51 Re: RFAdvice - a couple of old lost Altivec patches
• 2002-10-02 21:09 Re: RFAdvice - a couple of old lost Altivec patches
• 2002-10-03 16:55 Re: module level flags
• 2002-10-04 09:56 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-04 10:49 Problems with Java segment of website
• 2002-10-04 10:58 Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
• 2002-10-04 12:52 Re: [basic-improvements] bootstrap failure on x86
• 2002-10-06 11:46 Re: [basic-improvements] bootstrap failure on x86
• 2002-10-06 11:56 Re: [basic-improvements] bootstrap failure on x86
• 2002-10-06 22:33 Re: Linking?
• 2002-10-07 09:38 Re: Sun Tag
• 2002-10-13 20:32 Re: Slow/Swappy C++ compilation
• 2002-10-13 21:37 Swapped lines in i386.c:k6_cost?
• 2002-10-14 09:29 Re: quote marks [was: Status of i18n patches]
• 2002-10-14 09:59 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-14 11:38 Re: quote marks [was: Status of i18n patches]
• 2002-10-14 18:33 [basic-improvements] Merge from trunk, 2002-10-13
• 2002-10-14 20:28 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)
• 2002-10-15 00:22 Re: gcc-3_2-branch bootstrap failure when using bison-1.50
• 2002-10-15 17:19 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-15 17:35 Re: gcc 3.2.1 draft release notes, 3rd draft
• 2002-10-15 17:49 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)
• 2002-10-15 19:11 Re: Request of new __attribute__ for switch statements (elimination of the bounds check)
• 2002-10-15 21:16 Re: "Have we branched yet?"
• 2002-10-16 15:16 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-16 15:36 Re: GCC floating point usage
• 2002-10-17 20:13 Re: gcc 3.2.1 draft release notes, 3rd draft
• 2002-10-18 16:05 It's target deprecation season again!
• 2002-10-18 17:02 Re: It's target deprecation season again!
• 2002-10-18 20:28 Re: XML dumping and GraphViz/VCG in the GCC ast-optimizer-branch
• 2002-10-19 10:17 Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse
• 2002-10-19 11:11 Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse
• 2002-10-19 17:26 Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse
• 2002-10-20 14:41 [3.2] Reconsider patches for bison 1.50?
• 2002-10-21 10:47 [basic-improvements] Merge from trunk
• 2002-10-22 10:00 Re: real.c implementation
• 2002-10-22 14:20 Re: gcc 3.2.1 draft release notes, 3rd draft
• 2002-10-22 14:58 Re: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-22 21:00 Re: Update: status of high-priority GNATS bugs
• 2002-10-28 11:38 [basic-improvements] Merge from trunk
• 2002-10-28 12:52 Re: [basic-improvements] Merge from trunk
• 2002-10-29 15:11 Re: Subject: Removing the arg_index field from cpp_hashnode
• 2002-10-29 16:05 Re: Subject: Removing the arg_index field from cpp_hashnode
• 2002-10-30 11:32 Re: Exhaustive simulator testing
• 2002-10-31 11:41 Re: [basic-improvements] bootstrap failure on x86
• 2002-10-31 15:14 Re: Patch: stab info for const fields
• 2002-10-31 15:50 Re: Patch: stab info for const fields
• 2002-10-31 20:17 Re: Patch: stab info for const fields

zhjin

• 2002-10-16 22:28 link error: multiple definition of
• 2002-10-16 22:50 error : multiple definition of

清洁燃料供应--技术转让

• 2002-10-22 22:28 Technology Cooperation of Clean Fuel

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)