GCC 3.2 warnings

[Joe Buck]

On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 04:46:08PM -0700, Dan Mergens wrote:
> I've repeatedly come across the situation where I get a mess of many 
> warnings, but no errors and a bad status is returned and the compilation 
> fails. Is this because gcc by default bails out if there are too many 
> warnings? If so, it would be nice if it said so! Is there a way to 
> supress the behavior, or has is been fixed in 3.2.x or 3.3?

This is not supposed to happen.  Perhaps you have missed a hard error that
is buried inside the sea of warnings?  If not, then please file a bug
report.  The gcc developers will need a complete example that triggers
the bug.