GCC 3.2 warnings

[Mike Stump]

On Thursday, June 26, 2003, at 04:46 PM, Dan Mergens wrote:
> I've repeatedly come across the situation where I get a mess of many 
> warnings, but no errors and a bad status is returned and the 
> compilation fails. Is this because gcc by default bails out if there 
> are too many warnings? If so, it would be nice if it said so! Is there 
> a way to supress the behavior, or has is been fixed in 3.2.x or 3.3?

Add -w to the compile time flags, and see if what you think is true, is.

If it is, it is a bug.  File a bug report.