What's happening to SPEC's 164.gzip/176.gcc/254.gap??

[Diego Novillo]

On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Jan Hubicka wrote:

> > For the b-i-b tester, 176.gcc hasn't built in a while.  However,
> > gzip and gap seem fine.
> I've just fixed the problem that broke gcc so hope it will build
> tomorrow.
>
OK, thanks.

> I have no idea what is causing the regressions.  THe patch from day they
> happent does not show anything interesting, so it may be just setup
> change, but that looks unlikely too.
> 
Could it be some stray process running in the background?  The
graphs for b-i-b at http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec2000/
have been relatively smooth over the past few days.


Diego.