solution found for subclass method pointer problem

[Brent Phillips]

Hi,

Thanks to a suggestion from Doug Landauer, I found the heart of the 
problem, which is that

&foo::bar is a pointer-to-member, but
&(foo::bar) is not.

Evidently this is from section 5.3.1 of the standard.

I also had to remove the use of macro, which shouldn't have made a 
difference, but did...but I won't argue with what works. :0

Brent