Official start of GCC translations

[Martin v. Loewis]

> The gcc.pot in CVS has neither package name nor version, as it's directly
> generated by xgettext. So in order to make the catalogs destinguishable, I
> thought it would be a good idea to have the snapshot and release scripts
> replace the string VERSION in gcc.pot by either X.Y.YYYYMMDD for snapshots
> or X.Y for released versions.

But the snapshots are created automatically, one every week, right? So
it *would* mean that there is a new version of the catalog every week?

This is what I disliked about that plan.

Regards,
Martin