egcs-1.1 release issues

[Richard Henderson]

On Sat, Aug 29, 1998 at 12:07:36AM -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
>   >   * complex float (see complex-5),
> Nothing new here :(  I didn't know glibc depended on the complex
> extensions.  Sigh.  I guess we really need to fix them someday.

ISO C9x adds a whole suite of complex number functions.

>   >   * exp10 accuracy (which is currently implemented in terms
>   >     of exp, and so is not surprising).
> So would you classify this as an egcs problem or glibc problem?

double __ieee754_exp10 (double arg)
{
  return __ieee754_exp (M_LN10 * arg);
}

I would have to say glibc.  ;-)


r~