egcs-1.1 release issues
Jeffrey A Law
law@cygnus.com
Fri Aug 28 23:15:00 GMT 1998
In message < 19980828201015.E15907@dot.cygnus.com >you write:
> egcs-1.1 as of 980827 builds the tagged glibc just fine.
> A word of warning though that the tagged glibc is not
> fine on alpha.
>
> After fixing the bugs in glibc (for those who care to try
> a newer cvs version), all tests pass except for
>
> * complex float (see complex-5),
Nothing new here :( I didn't know glibc depended on the complex
extensions. Sigh. I guess we really need to fix them someday.
> * exp10 accuracy (which is currently implemented in terms
> of exp, and so is not surprising).
So would you classify this as an egcs problem or glibc problem?
jeff
More information about the Gcc
mailing list