egcs-1.1 release issues

Jeffrey A Law law@cygnus.com
Fri Aug 28 23:15:00 GMT 1998


  In message < 19980828201015.E15907@dot.cygnus.com >you write:
  > egcs-1.1 as of 980827 builds the tagged glibc just fine.
  > A word of warning though that the tagged glibc is not
  > fine on alpha. 
  > 
  > After fixing the bugs in glibc (for those who care to try
  > a newer cvs version), all tests pass except for
  > 
  >   * complex float (see complex-5),
Nothing new here :(  I didn't know glibc depended on the complex
extensions.  Sigh.  I guess we really need to fix them someday.

  >   * exp10 accuracy (which is currently implemented in terms
  >     of exp, and so is not surprising).
So would you classify this as an egcs problem or glibc problem?

jeff



More information about the Gcc mailing list