[Bug fortran/105138] [7,8,9,10,11,F95] Bogus error when function name does not shadow an intrinsic when RESULT clause is used
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Tue Apr 5 17:46:00 GMT 2022
- Previous message (by thread): [Bug fortran/105138] [7,8,9,10,11,12,F95] Bogus error when function name does not shadow an intrinsic when RESULT clause is used
- Next message (by thread): [Bug fortran/105138] [7,8,9,10,11,F95] Bogus error when function name does not shadow an intrinsic when RESULT clause is used
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105138
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[7,8,9,10,11,12,F95] Bogus |[7,8,9,10,11,F95] Bogus
|error when function name |error when function name
|does not shadow an |does not shadow an
|intrinsic when RESULT |intrinsic when RESULT
|clause is used |clause is used
--- Comment #13 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed on mainline for gcc-12 so far.
- Previous message (by thread): [Bug fortran/105138] [7,8,9,10,11,12,F95] Bogus error when function name does not shadow an intrinsic when RESULT clause is used
- Next message (by thread): [Bug fortran/105138] [7,8,9,10,11,F95] Bogus error when function name does not shadow an intrinsic when RESULT clause is used
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list