[Bug fortran/105138] [7,8,9,10,11,12,F95] Bogus error when function name does not shadow an intrinsic when RESULT clause is used
cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Tue Apr 5 17:38:17 GMT 2022
- Previous message (by thread): [Bug fortran/105138] [7,8,9,10,11,12,F95] Bogus error when function name does not shadow an intrinsic when RESULT clause is used
- Next message (by thread): [Bug fortran/105138] [7,8,9,10,11,F95] Bogus error when function name does not shadow an intrinsic when RESULT clause is used
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105138
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d46685b04071a485b56de353d997a866bfc8caba
commit r12-8002-gd46685b04071a485b56de353d997a866bfc8caba
Author: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
Date: Mon Apr 4 20:42:51 2022 +0200
Fortran: a RECURSIVE procedure cannot be an INTRINSIC
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/105138
* intrinsic.cc (gfc_is_intrinsic): When a symbol refers to a
RECURSIVE procedure, it cannot be an INTRINSIC.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/105138
* gfortran.dg/recursive_reference_3.f90: New test.
Co-authored-by: Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
- Previous message (by thread): [Bug fortran/105138] [7,8,9,10,11,12,F95] Bogus error when function name does not shadow an intrinsic when RESULT clause is used
- Next message (by thread): [Bug fortran/105138] [7,8,9,10,11,F95] Bogus error when function name does not shadow an intrinsic when RESULT clause is used
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list