[Bug fortran/105138] [7,8,9,10,11,F95] Bogus error when function name does not shadow an intrinsic when RESULT clause is used
cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Sun Apr 10 18:55:25 GMT 2022
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105138
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
<anlauf@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fdaa6de39a5da45dccd06c18dd355893b4cf9060
commit r11-9806-gfdaa6de39a5da45dccd06c18dd355893b4cf9060
Author: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
Date: Mon Apr 4 20:42:51 2022 +0200
Fortran: a RECURSIVE procedure cannot be an INTRINSIC
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/105138
* intrinsic.c (gfc_is_intrinsic): When a symbol refers to a
RECURSIVE procedure, it cannot be an INTRINSIC.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/105138
* gfortran.dg/recursive_reference_3.f90: New test.
Co-authored-by: Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
(cherry picked from commit d46685b04071a485b56de353d997a866bfc8caba)
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list