[Bug fortran/105138] [7,8,9,10,11,12,F95] Bogus error when function name does not shadow an intrinsic when RESULT clause is used
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Mon Apr 4 19:05:39 GMT 2022
- Previous message (by thread): [Bug fortran/105138] [7,8,9,10,11,12,F95] Bogus error when function name does not shadow an intrinsic when RESULT clause is used
- Next message (by thread): [Bug fortran/105138] [7,8,9,10,11,12,F95] Bogus error when function name does not shadow an intrinsic when RESULT clause is used
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105138
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Keywords| |rejects-valid, wrong-code
--- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2022-April/057731.html
- Previous message (by thread): [Bug fortran/105138] [7,8,9,10,11,12,F95] Bogus error when function name does not shadow an intrinsic when RESULT clause is used
- Next message (by thread): [Bug fortran/105138] [7,8,9,10,11,12,F95] Bogus error when function name does not shadow an intrinsic when RESULT clause is used
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list