[Bug c++/43333] [4.5 Regression] __is_pod seems broken

[paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com]

------- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2010-03-22 16:43 -------
Michael, I'm not sure to follow all the philosophical details of the issue. To
be sure:
1- __is_pod implements, to date, the correct C++0x semantics, modulo ISO DRs
(probably forthcoming, but a resolution seems quite far)
2- Thus, by definition, __is_pod is the right way to implement std::is_pod.
3- About tr1::is_pod, the issue is a little more muddled, but given my Comment
#7, we cannot really do wrong as regards TR1 is concerned (and, frankly I don't
care much about TR1). Note that the semantics of tr1::is_pod already changed
once, when __is_pod started to be used as an implementation detail.

All in all, if you ask me, until the ISO DR issue is resolved I don't think we
should do anything here.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43333