[Bug c++/43333] [4.5 Regression] __is_pod seems broken

[matz at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #8 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-03-22 16:34 -------
Re comment #6: well, then we still need to fix the c++98 case.
Re comment #7: note carefully how I have avoided is_pod<> in the testcase,
but instead used the internal mean to implement the former.  That's the
regression I'm interested about.  (well, to tell the truth I would also
consider it a regression of is_pod<>, if not by the letter of the standard,
then as quality of implementation, because we _do_ have compiler support)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43333